Wed May 25, 2016, 01:37 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
SoS rules
If Hills can break SoS rules with no consequences, Bernie supporters can break DNC convention rules too.
|
29 replies, 4958 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
aspirant | May 2016 | OP |
firebrand80 | May 2016 | #1 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #2 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #4 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #5 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #9 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #13 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #14 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #16 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #18 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #19 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #20 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #22 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #24 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #25 | |
karynnj | May 2016 | #8 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #3 | |
cali | May 2016 | #6 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #12 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #7 | |
karynnj | May 2016 | #10 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #11 | |
pdsimdars | May 2016 | #15 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #17 | |
Beausoir | May 2016 | #21 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #23 | |
pdsimdars | May 2016 | #26 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #27 | |
pdsimdars | May 2016 | #28 | |
aspirant | May 2016 | #29 |
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:39 PM
firebrand80 (2,760 posts)
1. What DNC convention rules could and/or should he break? nt
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:41 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
2. Does that include violence? Cause if it does, hurting others will get you jail time.
Some of you fanatics need to think about this, very carefully.
|
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #2)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:43 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
4. You mean like throwing chairs?
Response to aspirant (Reply #4)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:43 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
5. Maybe, if those chairs are aimed at somebody.
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #5)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:46 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
9. Then they are laws, beyond rules
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #13)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:57 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
14. Did Hills break FOIA laws?
Response to aspirant (Reply #14)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:01 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
16. She did not attack people violently. So WTH are you talking about?
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #16)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:04 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
18. Rules vs laws
FOIA laws compared to Assault and Battery laws
|
Response to aspirant (Reply #18)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:08 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
19. You are implying that Bernie supporters can do whatever at the DNC convention,
which I take to mean violence, because Hillary was not in complete compliance with rules that were not even fully enacted. This is hardly an accurate analogy. THAT is what I'm talking about.
|
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #19)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:16 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
20. The IG report says she "violated the rules"
but did she also break FOIA laws?
Does breaking rules not always result in breaking laws, is that Hills argument here? |
Response to aspirant (Reply #20)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:19 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
22. Huh?
I haven't heard anyone imply that she broke a law.
|
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #22)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:26 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
24. Maybe this
Ichingcarpenter (36,808 posts)
7. It's called a prima facie case: clear on the basis of known facts. Hillary Rodham Clinton has committed a felony. That is apparent from the facts and in the plain-language of the federal statute that prohibits "Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information", 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment. It's up to prosecutorial discretion by the US Attorney as to what charges may be filed and when. Nonetheless, Mrs. Clinton is clearly chargeable for violation of federal law. As of right now, the matter is under FBI investigation. This isn't just about violation of Departmental policy. Secretary Clinton was trained in handling of classified materials, and acknowledges that she understood them. By transmitting and receiving email correspondence that contained information gleaned from foreign government sources on an unauthorized, insecure system, she violated the law. This was not something she did unwittingly, and that the foreign government sourced material was not stamped classified is irrelevant. |
Response to aspirant (Reply #24)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:31 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
25. Ichingcarpenter? Bwahaha!
![]() |
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #2)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:46 PM
karynnj (59,159 posts)
8. Look no one should engage in any form of violence -- and the Sanders delegates have not
done anything violent -- unless you consider it violent verbal abuse to criticize HRC.
I take issue with "some of YOU fanatics". |
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:41 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
3. Anyone they choose, just like Hills
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:44 PM
cali (114,904 posts)
6. Two wrongs.....
Response to cali (Reply #6)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:51 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
12. Should both wrongs be punishable?
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:45 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
7. I'm a Bernie supporter and I disagree with this.
I expect Bernie to be completely honorable at the Democratic convention.
|
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #7)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:49 PM
karynnj (59,159 posts)
10. I agree - his message to his home state's convention was completely honorable
Not to mention, The VT convention was as polite and well behaved as anyone could ask for. Of course, the seats at the Barre Opera House were not movable - but no one even thew paper!
|
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #7)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:49 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
11. Why wouldn't Hills be "completely honorable" at SoS
Response to aspirant (Reply #11)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:58 PM
pdsimdars (6,007 posts)
15. Maybe that's what the FBI will ask her.
Response to pdsimdars (Reply #15)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:02 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
17. The FBI will get to ask her, the SoS IG was ignored by Hills
Response to aspirant (Original post)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:18 PM
Beausoir (7,540 posts)
21. Oh. So scary!
Response to Beausoir (Reply #21)
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:22 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
23. Is rule breaking at the DNC convention frightening?
Response to aspirant (Reply #23)
Wed May 25, 2016, 03:01 PM
pdsimdars (6,007 posts)
26. Does rule breaking make Boxer feel un-safe?
Response to pdsimdars (Reply #26)
Wed May 25, 2016, 03:12 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
27. Just how unruly can you get?
Response to aspirant (Reply #27)
Wed May 25, 2016, 07:07 PM
pdsimdars (6,007 posts)
28. I think you may hear people yelling . . . . . at a political convention. . . . eeeeek!
Response to pdsimdars (Reply #28)
Wed May 25, 2016, 07:42 PM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
29. I hope yelling isn't against the rules
or do we have to define the decibel.
|