Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:10 PM May 2016

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (wendylaroux) on Mon May 30, 2016, 06:30 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) wendylaroux May 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #1
She's a fine representative for those with no principles Press Virginia May 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #5
I wouldn't support her in 2008 and she's done nothing to make me Press Virginia May 2016 #8
"winning" XemaSab May 2016 #27
Does one ever win when they abandon any and all principles Press Virginia May 2016 #29
I keep going back to Game of Thrones XemaSab May 2016 #33
Nixon is looking better and better. 840high May 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #6
Was she promoting fracking, or using natural gas over coal or oil? Hoyt May 2016 #2
She promotes fracking. immoderate May 2016 #17
Were those from the "private" email batch? yodermon May 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #7
Permanent pantsuit conflagration cali May 2016 #9
😄 NV Whino May 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #24
Triangulating Pantsuit Fire XemaSab May 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #10
"Giving communities the right to say no" is a water sandwich BernieforPres2016 May 2016 #11
No, she's not committing to do anything herself, but she's encouraging the locals to infer it. hedda_foil May 2016 #38
Sounds like something you should take up with her boss at the time, POTUS Obama. Hekate May 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #15
If he had appointed an Inspector General for State... grasswire May 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #25
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #30
lol - so would I. 840high May 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #37
I doubt he even knew she hadn't appointed an IG. hedda_foil May 2016 #39
Surprise Surprise. PufPuf23 May 2016 #13
Frack no to Hillary! jfern May 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #20
Yep. polly7 May 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #22
another lie! and this is what uses all of California's water! amborin May 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author wendylaroux May 2016 #23
I hope Bernie brings that up frequently in the run up to the primary. nt vintx May 2016 #31
yes, amborin May 2016 #34
She did Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #26
"She said that the Iraq war was good for business!" Well, that wasn't a lie! BillZBubb May 2016 #32

Response to wendylaroux (Original post)

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
3. She's a fine representative for those with no principles
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:19 PM
May 2016

and I know there are a lot of them here today

Response to Press Virginia (Reply #3)

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
8. I wouldn't support her in 2008 and she's done nothing to make me
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

feel like I should support her now.
But there are some who are more about winning than standing behind the principles they claim to have

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
27. "winning"
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:03 PM
May 2016

They're more about "winning."

Any "winning" that involves war, fracking, and the global race to the bottom is not "winning" that I want any part of.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
29. Does one ever win when they abandon any and all principles
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:06 PM
May 2016

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
33. I keep going back to Game of Thrones
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:10 PM
May 2016

If you're willing to sell out to get some turf, you're going to find out that there's always someone who never had principles to begin with who claimed that turf before you.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
35. Nixon is looking better and better.
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:46 PM
May 2016

Response to NowSam (Reply #1)

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. Was she promoting fracking, or using natural gas over coal or oil?
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:18 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sat May 28, 2016, 09:53 PM - Edit history (1)

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
17. She promotes fracking.
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:40 PM
May 2016

--imm

yodermon

(6,146 posts)
4. Were those from the "private" email batch?
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:21 PM
May 2016

So confusing.

Response to yodermon (Reply #4)

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. Permanent pantsuit conflagration
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
14. 😄
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:38 PM
May 2016

Response to cali (Reply #9)

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
28. Triangulating Pantsuit Fire
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

Response to wendylaroux (Original post)

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
11. "Giving communities the right to say no" is a water sandwich
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:35 PM
May 2016

Hillary says that people in local communities can try to band together and dig into their pockets to try to fight the fracking companies (and the local representatives they buy off) in court. (They already have that option.) She is not committing to do anything herself to stop fracking.

hedda_foil

(16,399 posts)
38. No, she's not committing to do anything herself, but she's encouraging the locals to infer it.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

Meanwhile, she avoids making any promises at all. It's a sleazy game, but she and Bill have made it pay very very well.

Hekate

(91,659 posts)
12. Sounds like something you should take up with her boss at the time, POTUS Obama.
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:37 PM
May 2016

SoS doesn't go around making up policies on their own, I don't think.

Response to Hekate (Reply #12)

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
16. If he had appointed an Inspector General for State...
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:39 PM
May 2016

....things like this might have been known to Obama. He didn't. She ran roughshod, jeopardizing his administration and his legacy.

Response to grasswire (Reply #16)

Response to wendylaroux (Reply #25)

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
36. lol - so would I.
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

Response to Post removed (Reply #30)

hedda_foil

(16,399 posts)
39. I doubt he even knew she hadn't appointed an IG.
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

It was her responsibility.

PufPuf23

(8,954 posts)
13. Surprise Surprise.
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:38 PM
May 2016

Fracking is a dead end and damaging technology.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
18. Frack no to Hillary!
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:41 PM
May 2016

Response to jfern (Reply #18)

polly7

(20,582 posts)
19. Yep.
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:42 PM
May 2016
https://vimeo.com/157982054


*********************************************************************

(she didn't appear to consider much at all those 'conditions' she said she would insist on for the U.S., while pushing it for other nations whose people didn't want it.)


How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World

A trove of secret documents details the US government's global push for shale gas.

—By Mariah Blake | September/October 2014 Issue

ONE ICY MORNING in February 2012, Hillary Clinton's plane touched down in the Bulgarian capital, Sofia, which was just digging out from a fierce blizzard. Wrapped in a thick coat, the secretary of state descended the stairs to the snow-covered tarmac, where she and her aides piled into a motorcade bound for the presidential palace. That afternoon, they huddled with Bulgarian leaders, including Prime Minister Boyko Borissov, discussing everything from Syria's bloody civil war to their joint search for loose nukes. But the focus of the talks was fracking. The previous year, Bulgaria had signed a five-year, $68 million deal, granting US oil giant Chevron millions of acres in shale gas concessions. Bulgarians were outraged. Shortly before Clinton arrived, tens of thousands of protesters poured into the streets carrying placards that read "Stop fracking with our water" and "Chevron go home." Bulgaria's parliament responded by voting overwhelmingly for a fracking moratorium.


Clinton urged Bulgarian officials to give fracking another chance. According to Borissov, she agreed to help fly in the "best specialists on these new technologies to present the benefits to the Bulgarian people." But resistance only grew. The following month in neighboring Romania, thousands of people gathered to protest another Chevron fracking project, and Romania's parliament began weighing its own shale gas moratorium. Again Clinton intervened, dispatching her special envoy for energy in Eurasia, Richard Morningstar, to push back against the fracking bans. The State Depart­ment's lobbying effort culminated in late May 2012, when Morningstar held a series of meetings on fracking with top Bulgarian and Romanian officials. He also touted the technology in an interview on Bulgarian national radio, saying it could lead to a fivefold drop in the price of natural gas. A few weeks later, Romania's parliament voted down its proposed fracking ban and Bulgaria's eased its moratorium.



Hillary Clinton is welcomed to Sofia by Bulgarian Foreign Affairs Minister Nikolay Mladenov, left. US Department of State/flickr

Goldwyn had a long history of promoting drilling overseas—both as a Department of Energy official under Bill Clinton and as a representative of the oil industry. From 2005 to 2009 he directed the US-Libya Business Association, an organization funded primarily by US oil companies—including Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and Marathon—clamoring to tap Libya's abundant supply. Goldwyn lobbied Congress for pro-Libyan policies and even battled legislation that would have allowed families of the Lockerbie bombing victims to sue the Libyan government for its alleged role in the attack.


But environmental groups were barely consulted, while industry played a crucial role. When Goldwyn unveiled the initiative in April 2010, it was at a meeting of the United States Energy Association, a trade organization representing Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and ConocoPhillips, all of which were pursuing fracking overseas. Among their top targets was Poland, which preliminary studies suggested had abundant shale gas. The day after Goldwyn's announcement, the US Embassy in Warsaw helped organize a shale gas conference, underwritten by these same companies (plus the oil field services company Halliburton) and attended by officials from the departments of State and Energy.


http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/10/how-hillary-clintons-state-department-sold-fracking-to-the-world


pinebox (4,878 posts)

Absolutely a DAMNING piece---Hillary touted fracking across the globe

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251824618

Response to polly7 (Reply #19)

amborin

(16,631 posts)
21. another lie! and this is what uses all of California's water!
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:43 PM
May 2016

Response to amborin (Reply #21)

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
31. I hope Bernie brings that up frequently in the run up to the primary. nt
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:08 PM
May 2016

amborin

(16,631 posts)
34. yes,
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:38 PM
May 2016

it is a huge issue with Latinos in California, almost top issue b/c so many farmworkers' livelihoods are at stake

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
26. She did
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

but like Trump she changes policy positions to suit the backdrop. They both lie.

She said that the Iraq war was good for business!

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
32. "She said that the Iraq war was good for business!" Well, that wasn't a lie!
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:08 PM
May 2016

At least for the businesses in the MIC.

That's why she likes war so much. It's good for business and creates jobs! Win/Win right?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...