2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf the system is fair in the US, I am very sure that Mr. Sanders will win the nomination.
Just hoping! He is a much better candidate for America, working class and the middle class.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That might be a lot of good things, but "fair" seems like an odd one to choose
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)rather than endorsing one before any debates took place. We all know that Webb lost his way to the republican debate, but how on earth, the super delegates felt they needed to throw their hats in prior to Mr. Sanders or Mr. O'Malley debating Mrs. Clinton.
Honestly, the Democrats are not playing fairly, it is one sided.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)The establishment has been closing ranks around Hillary since 2012, if not 2009.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)who haven't voted. They and the DNC painted Bernie as the loser from the beginning.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)John King always does his breakdown with just the pledged delegates.
Hillary is ahead with pledged delegates by a significant margin.
If Bernie overtakes her with the pledged delegates, he should be the nominee.
If Hillary continues to maintain her lead with pledged delegates, she should be the nominee.
Would you agree?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)advantage from the get-go.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think the person who wins the most pledged delegates should be the nominee.
Personally, I think it should be primaries in every state as well so that more people can vote.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)who is behind her by hundreds of PDs and million of votes?
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Hillary is popular in the Senate and has support, but when Obama won more pledged delegates in 08, the supers switched to him as they vote for the candidate with the most delegates. Bernie had the same chance but could not pull it off. He lost. I would say caucuses are unfair to people who work for a living and don't have time to sit around an entire day to vote in a primary. But it is the process in some states, and I don't go around calling it rigged.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)And I don't think all the primaries and caucuses were fair.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Taking Hillary and Bernie out of it, how do you think the process should go?
merrily
(45,251 posts)In my state, it was Bubba showing up at the polls. http://jackpineradicals.org/showthread.php?12103-Second-merrily-Modest-Proposal-Abolish-Presidential-Primaries&p=75930#post75930
How do you fail safe for things like that?
There was also an issue in my state of a sampling of hand-counted ballots coming out decisively for Sanders, while the machine counted ballots came out narrowly for Hillary.
However, long before I ever dreamt Sanders would run, I have spoken out against super delegates.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That's why I asked the question the way I did.
Taking the shenanigans of this cycle out of the picture, what do you think would be the best way for the nomination process to occur in the future?
merrily
(45,251 posts)this thread have been about the rigging of the system by people who, IMO, have abused it. I have never posted that the system itself is inherently bad, so I am not sure why you addressed your question to me.
Even if I had posted something that justified putting that question to me, forgive me, but I think it's rather silly to expect a lone message board poster to come up with the "fairest" system on the spot, and without being paid for such a task. A group of political scientists studying the matter seems much likelier to produce something meaningful.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Was just interested to hear different points of view.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...
Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
RogueTrooper
(4,665 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)In what world does this happen....sanders has never been vetted and would be destroyed in weeks once the focus is placed on his record and positions
an angry old socialist will not be our nominee
merrily
(45,251 posts)combined are counted as zero votes.
Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)Hillary also got votes in those states. Bernie nets a small amount of votes from the caucus states because few people showed up in small states. But then we should also factor in that the two caucus states that later had elections Bernie lost both. It is likely that he would have lost most of them if everyone could vote.
Besides all that, they both participated under the same rules and Bernie ended up in a 3 million vote hole which is about to get bigger.
merrily
(45,251 posts)votes they represent.
They participated under the same rules, but counting all caucus states as zero votes is the issue, not the nature of their participation However,, with the behavior of the establishment, from the DNC to state parties to media, to "strategists and pundits to PACS, it cannot be said honestly they both had level playing fields.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)show that caucuses should be gotten rid of yesterday.
If all states had primaries Sanders would have been disposed of long ago.
And btw, in case you want to go there, Clinton has won more open primaries than Sanders also.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And, while I appreciate your eagerness to keep me from going there, the post of mine to which you are replying was in specific response to the 3,000,000 vote comment. I was not having a free-ranging discussion.
brush
(53,776 posts)Were they not factored into his vote tally nationwide as well as Clinton's?
It is what it is. She's ahead in votes.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)he's been in Congress for decades. Bernie lost...
- on super delegates
- on pledged delegates
- on newspaper endorsements
- on union endorsements
- on popular votes
- on money raised
It was not a close race; not near as close as 2008. Bernie knew how elections work. It was fair.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)So taking the Super Delegates out of the first vote in the convention Hillary will still win the vote. You can dislike the SD's they are still a part of rules Sanders agreed to follow when he agreed to when running as a DNC candidate. Rest easy knowing Hillary will have the delegates. Hillary is the best qualified candidate running.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Never mind that voter overwhelmingly chose Hillary..nine days and Bernie is out.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)Or some such nonsense. But Hillary winning fair and square is a moral outrage.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)The fifty different state level contests that involve voters?
The fifty county level conventions that have decades if not hundred+ years of rules and arcane reasons that make sense based on local politics?
On the next level state conventions for the delegates that are the same?
And then the national convention?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)FFS I voted for him too but it isn't fair for him to get the nomination when he loses the primary elections. There's a lot of wishful thinking around here that he'll get the nomination regardless, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wishful thinking is based on "fairness."
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)*that's* how delusional they've become.
Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)And if it was fair there would be no Super-Delegates for Sanders to try to flip.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He lost, fairly.
Alex4Martinez
(2,193 posts)Cosmically, spiritually, ethically and morally, there is one clear winner and it's not the former SOS.
He has won. What happens with the rest of this corrupted primary and the general election remains to be seen.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)It's funny because Bernie has not won the primary contest as you state in your headline.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)For Sanders to deserve the nomination, Sanders needed to win support from these groups and he failed at this attempt