Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:35 PM Jun 2016

Bill Richardson On Ed Schultz Show Tonight: "Hillary Will Tell Putin We Tried It Your Way...

which is not working, so now we're gonna try it my way... I'm putting in a No Fly Zone over Syria..."

So THIS plan is somehow more responsible than Donald Trump's bombastic comments?

Anyone think that this might just increase the potential to start WWIII?

And what "pipeline" might these arms sales be going through?

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Richardson On Ed Schultz Show Tonight: "Hillary Will Tell Putin We Tried It Your Way... (Original Post) CorporatistNation Jun 2016 OP
Bill Richardson is NOT a friend to Hillary Clinton; many grains of salt MADem Jun 2016 #1
Still, HRC favors the no-fly zone, Obama does not. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #3
Don't trust Bill Richardson to give you ANY guidance as to her POV. He doesn't know. nt MADem Jun 2016 #5
It's in Hillary's own words. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #13
Again, Bill Richardson has zero insight into Clinton's thought process today. MADem Jun 2016 #25
I don't care about what Richardson said, I'm just talking about the Syrian no-fly zone idea thesquanderer Jun 2016 #30
I think HRC will make judgments based on the conditions on the ground. MADem Jun 2016 #36
Sure, she can change her mind based on a changing situation. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #37
Obama trusted him enough to let him negotiate the release of hostages in North Korea. FSogol Jun 2016 #40
Quite a step down from the job he wanted (SECSTATE). He thought kneecapping Clinton would get him MADem Jun 2016 #42
THE END IS NIGH onehandle Jun 2016 #2
Sorry, Mucho "Issues" That Remain Unsettled... Here Ya Go.... CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #4
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!" MADem Jun 2016 #8
Your Assertion Is Complete Nonsense! Todd Has Been Carrying H2O For Hillary Throughout CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #14
No, he hasn't. He handles BS like a rare Faberge Egg. As he did last week. MADem Jun 2016 #24
When did ISIS get aircraft? icecreamfan Jun 2016 #6
Very Sober Analysis... Such As Many Have Made About This Current Or Pending Hillary Miscue! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #7
Apparently not enough blood in the Middle East for her to sate her appetite. notadmblnd Jun 2016 #9
she thinks Libya was a bloodless success with just a few flaws, which are caused solely by not MisterP Jun 2016 #23
It seems "no-fly zone" is her code word for active US-imposed regime change in Syria icecreamfan Jun 2016 #38
No fly zones are defensive in nature. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #10
A Matter of Perception! Whose Planes Would WE Be "Policing" Over Syria? RUSSIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #15
Putin is full of bluster but he is not stupid BootinUp Jun 2016 #16
Putin is a KGB Officer. Lt. Col. In the KGB. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #17
And then what? Seriously? nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #18
I guess your incapability to see possibilities brands you for the Hillary supporter you are. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #19
Again, wide support plus the ease of enforcement BootinUp Jun 2016 #20
Putin would have little choice, but not the way you think. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #28
SInce neither side wants war between the two BootinUp Jun 2016 #32
And that is why the Russians will violate a no-fly zone with impunity. nt cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #39
He's not going to go along with anything that is aimed at bring down Assad and destroying Syria bjo59 Jun 2016 #27
Not willingly no. Which is why it would take BootinUp Jun 2016 #33
And they wonder why we call Clinton a neocon Robbins Jun 2016 #11
We might as well be nominating another Bush Doctor_J Jun 2016 #22
well iI have read that Bill Kristol is running a 3rd party candidate there by splitting azurnoir Jun 2016 #29
That's psycho! 4139 Jun 2016 #12
So one of the main perpetrators of Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Honduras wants a war with Russia Doctor_J Jun 2016 #21
Well if you read news sites that merit the term "left," you've noticed that political bjo59 Jun 2016 #26
for someone who loves to wrap herself in Obama tk2kewl Jun 2016 #31
Putin won't back down to Hillary Clinton, that's for damn sure. davidn3600 Jun 2016 #34
LOL Seriously, does Hillary know that people don't use folding maps anymore? pinebox Jun 2016 #35
this is insanity! she is hell bent on her neo con agenda amborin Jun 2016 #41
Hillary will tell Putin "we tried it your way" NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #43

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Bill Richardson is NOT a friend to Hillary Clinton; many grains of salt
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:39 PM
Jun 2016

should be taken with that opinion of his. He was rather a disloyal shit in the last election which is why neither Clinton nor Obama trust him. His personal life is a mess, too.

thesquanderer

(11,901 posts)
3. Still, HRC favors the no-fly zone, Obama does not.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:44 PM
Jun 2016

HRC voters are voting for a more hawkish foreign policy, it's a real issue.

thesquanderer

(11,901 posts)
30. I don't care about what Richardson said, I'm just talking about the Syrian no-fly zone idea
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 06:12 AM
Jun 2016

Do you have any reason to believe Hillary no longer wants such a thing? It's still even on her web site

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factchecks/2016/01/17/the-truth-about-clintons-record-in-syria/

My point, again, as has been discussed in the past from this and other perspectives, is that Hillary is more hawkish than Obama. I'm not even saying that everyone thinks that's a bad thing, but there are many who do, and it is a legitimate issue.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
36. I think HRC will make judgments based on the conditions on the ground.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 10:59 AM
Jun 2016

I don't think she'll hold fast to/reject anything based on "Because I said this once" or "Because I felt that once."

Her responses to any issues will be situational and appropriate to the matter at hand. There is no point in saying she WILL do X or she WON'T do Y now--things can and do change.

But again, my point was about Bill Richardson. They aren't buddies--he screwed her over in 08. He's duplicitous, and also has a corrupt stink about him, which is why Obama didn't give him any love either. He also has a messy personal life.

He had a Bigger Things future once. He doesn't anymore because he got greedy and tried to bigfoot Clinton. He's desperately trying to find his way back into the fold, and he has endorsed HRC (for whatever that is worth) but I am guessing she'll keep him at arm's length, unless she needs a high profile character to go to North Korea and negotiate this or that (he's done that before, and well).

thesquanderer

(11,901 posts)
37. Sure, she can change her mind based on a changing situation.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jun 2016

But with the situation as it is today (or at least as it was earlier this year), she supports the no-fly zone. Sanders and Obama have been against it. The point is, everything we know about her tells us that she leans more hawkish than Sanders (or Obama), and that is one of the things that tends to work against her among those on the left. How it plays in the general, I don't know.

FSogol

(45,268 posts)
40. Obama trusted him enough to let him negotiate the release of hostages in North Korea.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:36 AM
Jun 2016

He also considered him for a cabinet post, which Richardson recused himself from. Notice the allegations against him never materialized and no charges were brought?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
42. Quite a step down from the job he wanted (SECSTATE). He thought kneecapping Clinton would get him
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jun 2016

that gig.


Didn't work out so well for him.

He "recused" himself from a crap cabinet job (Commerce--not the one he wanted) because he was UNDER INVESTIGATION. It's likely he was TOLD to "recuse himself" to spare himself the public embarrassment of having his nomination rescinded. And no, he wasn't prosecuted, but that's not because there weren't "problems" with those pay-to-play charges. Was he completely innocent? Only he knows. On the one hand, money DID change hands, lots of it. On the other hand, the BUSH administration was targeting Democratic governors like a house on fire during that time.

The statute of limitations expired on the charges, and DOJ didn't try to extend them.

It's not because he was proven "innocent" that he didn't get prosecuted (though he might well have been), it's because the clock ran out. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082702376.html

That scandal still reverberated years later: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/pay-to-play-scandal-lingers-long-after-richardson/article_57ef5349-1b9b-5590-b21d-c5496da75961.html

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
4. Sorry, Mucho "Issues" That Remain Unsettled... Here Ya Go....
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:52 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:49 AM - Edit history (5)

e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jun 2016

Chuck Todd? You mean the guy whose WIFE works for Sanders, and she has been enriched by $1.3 million since the establishment of her association with him? That Chuck Todd?

He certainly has a reason to boost Sanders, with positive words for him, negative ones for his opponent, and softball interviews that are close to gushing.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
14. Your Assertion Is Complete Nonsense! Todd Has Been Carrying H2O For Hillary Throughout
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jun 2016

the campaign ad nauseum! The POINT IS... Todd, Andrea... All water carriers for Clinton solemnly stated the TRUTH! So I guess there are people who do not "hear" the prevarication in the about half a dozen Hillary interviews where she is completely in opposition to the FACTS! Unbelievable!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
24. No, he hasn't. He handles BS like a rare Faberge Egg. As he did last week.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 03:15 AM
Jun 2016

So do what you will with your "FACTS! Unbelievable!" griping.

His wife is $1.3 MILLION dollars richer, thanks to Bernie Sanders' campaign. You can be damn sure he's aware of that. It certainly comes out in the way he approaches his interview subject.

icecreamfan

(115 posts)
6. When did ISIS get aircraft?
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jun 2016

Is this "no-fly zone" Clinton wants about protecting civilians and bringing an end to hostilities or pushing the geopolitical (oil and gas pipeline) interests of Saudi Arabia, Europe and the US vs. Russia and Iran?

We should be fighting the radical Sunni terrorists ISIS and Al Nusra not further destabilizing the region and risking a Vietnam-like conflict with Russia and Iran.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
7. Very Sober Analysis... Such As Many Have Made About This Current Or Pending Hillary Miscue!
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jun 2016

Last edited Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:51 PM - Edit history (1)

Do we need more of THIS?

e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
23. she thinks Libya was a bloodless success with just a few flaws, which are caused solely by not
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jun 2016

intervening hard enough, and that Syria should be more like it

icecreamfan

(115 posts)
38. It seems "no-fly zone" is her code word for active US-imposed regime change in Syria
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:30 AM
Jun 2016

From the limited information that's out there on what would replace Assad, it's very likely Syria would continue to be a failed state for a long time if she got her "no-fly zone."

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
15. A Matter of Perception! Whose Planes Would WE Be "Policing" Over Syria? RUSSIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016

Ya think something ill considered might happen to trigger hostilities IF we put in place a NO FLY ZONE?

WTFU!

BootinUp

(46,619 posts)
16. Putin is full of bluster but he is not stupid
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jun 2016

in other words, if the majority of the world supports the idea (of a no-fly zone) there is little chance of him militarily opposing it. And thats an understatement.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
17. Putin is a KGB Officer. Lt. Col. In the KGB.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:03 PM
Jun 2016

He'll have some "expendable" people shoot at our planes as they patrol any no-fly zone.

He is not stupid, as you say. But may I add that "not stupid" is like saying the star Polaris isn't far away? After all... we can see it.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
28. Putin would have little choice, but not the way you think.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:14 AM
Jun 2016

Who are we to declare no-fly zones over some other sovereign country?

Besides that, Putin would not accept a no-fly zone in Syria, no more than Obama would accept one over Afghanistan.

Putin would have to challenge it. And then America would either have to back down, or deliberately destroy a Russian airplane.

I can't believe anyone is even contemplating this. We are not at war with Syria. And we are not at war Russia. Shoot down a plane and things could easily spiral out of control, as they did in 1914.

No more wars, please.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
27. He's not going to go along with anything that is aimed at bring down Assad and destroying Syria
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:10 AM
Jun 2016

as a cohesive state. Why do you think he got involved there militarily in the first place after trying to get the US government to deal with him diplomatically? The US is playing a very dangerous game. You should read up on Russia's new weapons, some of which Putin rolled out in Syria not too long ago, catching the US completely off guard.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
11. And they wonder why we call Clinton a neocon
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jun 2016

just terrable what democratic party is turning into.and what give sus the right to declare no fly zone In Syria.I will be blasted for it but i didn't support that In Iraq eather.yes i am showing my age here.

With iraq you at least had excuse it wa spart of ceae fire.I forget when we had every right to tell syria what they could do.and do you think Putin will just sit back if russians are killed even by accident.an american president would be pressured to act if americans were killed by other country like that.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
21. So one of the main perpetrators of Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Honduras wants a war with Russia
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jun 2016

Good God, what a disaster.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
26. Well if you read news sites that merit the term "left," you've noticed that political
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 04:04 AM
Jun 2016

commentators have been talking about the drum beat of WWIII beating ever more strongly as time goes on. Refusing to seriously engage diplomatically with Putin has been a very big mistake. If Clinton wants to play chicken with Putin, she won't win. It's sheer madness. After watching that video of she and James Baker chortling with glee over the idea of "taking out" Iran, you can see how a WWIII would happen. Russia will never allow the US to "take out" Iran (which will be in the crosshairs as soon (and if) they manage to get rid of Assad and balkanize Syria. Even members of the military have been quoted as saying that Hillary Clinton is by far the most militaristic presidential candidate to come down the pike in a long, long time. I pray that her monkeying around as Secretary of State will bring her down before she gets into the position of Commander in Chief.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
31. for someone who loves to wrap herself in Obama
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:40 AM
Jun 2016

She's seems to be in a big hurry to undo his foreign pain Syria and Iran

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
35. LOL Seriously, does Hillary know that people don't use folding maps anymore?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 08:51 AM
Jun 2016

Out of touch is out of touch.
Maybe she should have used this to back up her emails.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bill Richardson On Ed Sch...