Will he argue that she faces indictment? That's certainly seems to be a favorite argument here on DU among Sanders supporters for distinguishing this election cycle's results for those in previous years when the super d's supported the candidate that won the majority of the pledged delegates. But since the super d's have been aware of the FBI investigation since February and haven't rescinded their support and, in fact, she's continued to add new super d commitments, what is likelihood that argument would carry the day with any of the super d's.
Will he argue that his policies are better than hers? Arguments about the two candidates' policies have been out there for months and months, so what new policy distinction will change super d's minds?
Electability? Will he argue that the polls show he does better against Trump? Will super d's, who are veteran political animals, buy that argument when history suggests polls this far out are unreliable? If super d's think both Clinton and Sanders are electable (which probably is the case for most of them given who the opposition is) what will make them change their minds about supporting Clinton given the unreliability of polls this far out?
= new reply since forum marked as read
