Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:10 PM Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders supporters decry Elizabeth Warren's endorsement of Hillary

Bernie Sanders supporters have not taken well to Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren’s endorsement of Democratic presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton, with many arguing that it would seriously undermine Warren’s reputation as a champion of progressives and the working people of America.

<...>

The disgruntled supporters are not only making their voices heard on Facebook. Even on YouTube, a chunk of Bernie Sanders’ supporters vented their ire on Warren’s decision to endorse Hillary Clinton. While many called on her to reconsider her decision, others termed her a “sellout,” a “pseudo progressive neoliberal,” and one commenter even suggested that she was similar to a “parasite” who displayed “gross opportunism” in deciding to support Clinton.

According to The Hill, it is not only Bernie Sanders’ supporters who are critical of Elizabeth Warren, but even Sanders’ surrogate and former Ohio state senator Nina Turner lashed out at her, saying that the Massachusetts Democrat has not done enough for the progressive cause.

Read more:

http://www.inquisitr.com/3189696/bernie-sanders-supporters-decry-elizabeth-warrens-endorsement-of-hillary-clinton-thanks-for-being-a-sellout/

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders supporters decry Elizabeth Warren's endorsement of Hillary (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 OP
Elizabeth Warren understands apcalc Jun 2016 #1
"Some" I think would be more correct rather than an implied all still_one Jun 2016 #2
Well said. Elizabeth is a progressive as they come but does not let the perfect get in the way of pampango Jun 2016 #12
Elizabeth Warren was concerned about the influence of big money on Politics. Until she wasn't. nt Romulox Jun 2016 #3
OK....I'll "bite." Peregrine Took Jun 2016 #4
Me too RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #20
She didn't support Clinton either. wisteria Jun 2016 #34
I know.. I do not understand the vitriol being hurled at her Peacetrain Jun 2016 #5
Yep right under the bus. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #6
Wait until Bernie endorses Hillary. Oh the Huge Manatees. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #7
You mean "Yuge" Manatees, right? (nt) apnu Jun 2016 #16
Lol.... Yes, I do! Adrahil Jun 2016 #17
LOL!!! Beacool Jun 2016 #25
the people hating on Elizabeth Warren are fanatics who would never be happy geek tragedy Jun 2016 #8
I tend to agree with you. They just don't understand how our goverment runs. wisteria Jun 2016 #36
The ones dumb enough to attack Warren are the ones who I'm sure don't know Bernie's real record. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #9
She was the best Senator ever until she endorsed Clinton, then she was a sellout Hillary shill. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #10
I have had my doubts about her all along RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #22
Except the Queen is in England and her politics don't really matter justiceischeap Jun 2016 #26
Clinton was a Republican 40 years ago; Warren > 20. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #37
This is a bullshit talking point and you know it. Arkana Jun 2016 #40
Queen huh? MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #43
I certainly would have voted for Elizabeth Warren. In fact I did in 2012. iscooterliberally Jun 2016 #28
I saw her called a skank and worse. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #11
Please help me understand why you keep doing this. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #13
To some fools it's natural, like breathing. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #14
They torched her Facebook page MFM008 Jun 2016 #15
Yep... Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #18
That bus pic is awesome! tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #19
Based on the lack of criticism of Warren by Bernie supporters here democrattotheend Jun 2016 #21
I will criticize ANYONE, RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #23
Well, you do have until the 16th leftofcool Jun 2016 #31
Toeing the party line will be so awesome! Gore1FL Jun 2016 #32
The Party - right or wrong! Beowulf Jun 2016 #38
The way I figure it Warren got some promises out of Clinton. hollowdweller Jun 2016 #42
A Democratic senator endorses the presumptive Democratic nominee. Beacool Jun 2016 #24
Of course they did. We must think in lock-step or under the bus they go Lil Missy Jun 2016 #27
Yawn Scootaloo Jun 2016 #29
+1 Gore1FL Jun 2016 #33
all class, all the time . . . DrDan Jun 2016 #30
I don't decry it. Hillary is the nominee, whether I like it or not. liberalnarb Jun 2016 #35
My theory Beowulf Jun 2016 #39
Nina Turner has a future in comedy. I know she makes me laugh. nt BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #41

pampango

(24,692 posts)
12. Well said. Elizabeth is a progressive as they come but does not let the perfect get in the way of
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jun 2016

the good. Most Bernie supporters are the same.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
20. Me too
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

To quote Nina, “It’s easy for Democrats to attack Mr. Trump,” Turner said. “You don’t get any brownie points from me and other progressives for getting into a Twitter war with Mr. Donald Trump. That’s easy.

“But when the fight was hard for Sen. Bernie Sanders, where was Sen. Warren?”


Yeah, I wanna know too!

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
34. She didn't support Clinton either.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:09 PM
Jun 2016

Why would Nina think Sander's was owed her vote? I don't think she owed him anything.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. the people hating on Elizabeth Warren are fanatics who would never be happy
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jun 2016

with a sane, responsible governing party

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
36. I tend to agree with you. They just don't understand how our goverment runs.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:11 PM
Jun 2016

America was never about just getting everything you want, the way you want it.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
10. She was the best Senator ever until she endorsed Clinton, then she was a sellout Hillary shill.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:28 PM
Jun 2016

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

Granted, it's only a small (?) subset of Sanders supporters who are throwing her under the bus, but I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of them would have voted for her in a heartbeat had Sanders not run, and with never an assertion that she's a sellout.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
22. I have had my doubts about her all along
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jun 2016

She is also a former Republican as is the Queen, and her steadfast support for Israel has made me wonder since she first came on the seen. Personally, I like some of the things that she has done, but I still have had a "wait and see" attitude about her.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
26. Except the Queen is in England and her politics don't really matter
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jun 2016

If you mean Hillary, she was a Republican for all of 5 minutes. For the rest of her adult life she has been a Democrat. Maybe not the Democrat you want but a Democrat all the same.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
37. Clinton was a Republican 40 years ago; Warren > 20.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:15 PM
Jun 2016

Neither fact is even remotely relevant in today's world.

As for the "Queen" nonsense, don't be surprised if people don't take you seriously if that's your go-to shtick.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
40. This is a bullshit talking point and you know it.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jun 2016

Being a former Republican isn't a sin, and supporting Israel is hardly outside the Democratic mainstream.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
43. Queen huh?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jun 2016

So much was closing in about the women who sat knitting, knitting, that they their very selves were closing in around a structure yet unbuilt, where they were to sit knitting, knitting,

I knit too

iscooterliberally

(2,860 posts)
28. I certainly would have voted for Elizabeth Warren. In fact I did in 2012.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jun 2016

I happened to be living in Boston back then. I really was hoping that Bernie would win the nomination. I knew it was a long shot, and I think he did really well since so many people didn't even know who he was at the start. I hope that Senator Sanders and Senator Warren come together with Secretary Clinton and become part of what I hope is her new administration. I certainly don't want to see a President 'Donald Dumpsterfire' in the white house. Good grief. I thought George W Bush was an embarrassment.


Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
13. Please help me understand why you keep doing this.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jun 2016

I'm really hoping to find a reasonable, adult-themed explanation as to why it makes any sense at all to keep hacking away at fresh wounds and dividing us, and how that is of any benefit whatsoever to our DU community, our party or our candidate.

I simply don't know what the positive benefit is here, and to whom?

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
14. To some fools it's natural, like breathing.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

It only makes things worse.

You've made excellent points, MK.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
15. They torched her Facebook page
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

Even if HRC asked and Sanders accepted the VP slot, some and i say SOME of people who claim they support him
would do the same thing to him for "giving in".
so its a no win for either he or Warren and EW is ready for a fight.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
18. Yep...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie will be thrown under the bus very soon after he endorses Hillary.

Nobody is safe, not even Bernie himself.

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
19. That bus pic is awesome!
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

I find it hilarious that people are throwing Warren under the bus. For years she has been hailed as the savior and within a day she is a sellout? I think this could be worse than the PUMA movement of 2008.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
21. Based on the lack of criticism of Warren by Bernie supporters here
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jun 2016

I am thinking a lot of them are Republican trolls.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
23. I will criticize ANYONE,
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jun 2016

including Warren, Clinton, Sanders, or ANYONE. I have made some negative remarks about Warren, but I am in no way a RepubliCON troll. No way in hell!

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
32. Toeing the party line will be so awesome!
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jun 2016

I think it will be great when censorship is employed!

Our leader is great
Our leader is above reproach
Our leader can do no wrong
All hail our great leader!

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
42. The way I figure it Warren got some promises out of Clinton.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:05 PM
Jun 2016

I don't think she would ruin her brand by endorsing Clinton and then Clinton doing something really dumb.

I mean I guess the Clintons have so many allies she could have been afraid that if she didn't they would cut her out of power, but guessing she would say something about it.

So I'm guessing Warren maybe secured some promises that will pay off for the more populist dems.

If you look at how Clinton pivoted in her rhetoric and proposals after she realized they were so popular for Sanders, Clinton is in pretty much the right place if she makes good or even tries to make good on any or most.

So as a Bernie supporter my main hope is it's not just saying it. I hope she really does it. I'm tired as a Dem of us pushing the cultural issues so hard, even though that's ok, and not pushing the economic issues.

I think if Hillary does not deliver we will see a democrat or republican offer more economic populisim and challenge her. If she does deliver we may see the Dems stay in power a LONG time.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
24. A Democratic senator endorses the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jun 2016

Who do they think that she was going to endorse?????? To top it all, she's the only one of the women Democratic senators who withheld her endorsement until the nomination was decided.

I think that she was respectful to both candidates by deciding to stay neutral until the nomination process neared its end.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
27. Of course they did. We must think in lock-step or under the bus they go
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jun 2016

That's why Purists are impossible to please.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. Yawn
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jun 2016

Here Cali_Democrat, let me share with you Gabe's Greater Internet Fuckwad THeory:



Youtube comments are pretty much example #1 of this theory. And the damned thing is, if you're using internet fuckwads to try to classify and define an entire group of real people, you're actually joining the fuckwad herd.

I kinda wish Warren had endorsed bernie earlier in the campaign. But I know shy she's endorsing Hillary now. No biggy to me.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
35. I don't decry it. Hillary is the nominee, whether I like it or not.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jun 2016

I think you need to stop categorizing all Sanders supporters based on a few online.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
39. My theory
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jun 2016

Warren wasn't going to risk any political skin in the primary. She struggled with her party's leaders in the Senate and was able to move from the periphery to a position of increased influence. Now Harry is retiring and will be replaced by Chuck Schumer, who is as tight with Wall Street as can be. Why risk getting on Schumer's bad side after working so hard to increase her influence. Hillary didn't need her endorsement, Bernie did, but I think Warren didn't think he could win, so why take the risk.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders supporters...