2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Party at Odds on Neoliberalism
David Weigel
The Washington Post
With that back-and-forth, Sanders and Obama elevated a debate that has gone on in public and private for years. It has intensified since Sanders began winding down his campaign for president and focusing on changes to the Democratic platform. According to people with knowledge of the platform negotiations, Sanders used his post-primary meeting with the president to say he would push for the party to officially oppose the TPP. The president said he would not allow it. And since then, the White House has leaned on key Democrats to make sure that the platform did not include a rebuke.
That became clear last weekend in St. Louis, when the platform drafting committee -- which includes just five Sanders appointees -- shot down a TPP plank. According to several committee members, the president personally spoke to the drafting committee's chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), and the White House did more outreach to make sure that Clinton appointees who might otherwise oppose TPP did not write that into the platform.
"Both candidates -- Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders -- oppose the TPP because it has failed to meet the standards that this committee has laid out," said Paul Booth, the executive assistant to the president of AFSCME, and a Clinton appointee. "But the platform committee should affirm what our candidates have said, but not imply that all Democrats are in agreement."
But on Friday, as Democrats debated Rep. Keith Ellison's (D-Minn.) strong anti-TPP plank, Clinton allies and DNC appointees were blunt. To change the language would be to undermine the president.
"The vast majority of Democrats in the House will not vote for the [TPP]," said Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Clinton appointee. "That's really not the point. I haven't voted for a trade agreement since I joined the Congress in 1993. Having said that, there are Democrats who believe in the trade agreement. I could say to them: You're not important. I could say that. I've done that in the past. But what I don't want to do is leave this place disregarding the position of the President of the United States."
TPP is bad policy and bad politics. Mr. Obama is wrong on this, and framing the party moving forward as somehow disrespecting the president is disingenuous and a dubious electoral strategy. Mr. Obama is not running in 2016, and hurting the party in the present with the illusion of agreement on failed neoliberal policy is just dumb. Mrs. Clinton is running, and this undermines her public rejection of TPP.
merrily
(45,251 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And as long as such is pushed on us, there will be suspicion.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Weigel won't be asked to run a campaign for anybody, that is for sure. Pretty dumb argument to make at this time.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)What is there to be at odds about?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Looks to me like Weigel needs to invest in a good dictionary.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)The world isnt going to wait for us. If China writes the rules you can kiss labor and environmental standards goodbye for a generation. Many of you should actually take the time to read it, or at least go to ustr website and read about it.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)You are repeatedly misrepresenting it by defining it as something it is not.
You start with a false premise, nothing credible afterwards.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)portlander23
(2,078 posts)/ˌniːəʊˈlɪbərəˌlɪzəm; -ˈlɪbrəˌlɪzəm/
noun
1. a modern politico-economic theory favouring free trade, privatization, minimal government intervention in business, reduced public expenditure on social services, etc
Derived Forms
neoliberal, adjective, noun
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Sounds like the Republicans, though.
portlander23
(2,078 posts)You sir, have just put into clearer perspective than I ever could about the choice the party faces.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Obama is not neoliberal. HRC is not neoliberal. The TPP is not neoliberal.
Reagan was neoliberal.
emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)gordianot
(15,237 posts)Such cutting insight.