2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders gets compromise from HRC on college affordablity.
Hillary Clinton is changing her college-affordability plan in an effort to reach Bernie Sanders supporters, proposing the elimination of public in-state tuition for students whose families make less than $125,000, an aide said.
Clintons move toward Sanders proposaltuition-free college at public institutionscomes as she seeks to consolidate the Vermont senators backers in her campaign for the White House against Republican Donald Trump.
Clinton would also impose a three-month moratorium on federal student loan payments and endorse reinstating year-round access to Pell Grants, said the aide, who asked not to be named ahead of a formal announcement.
Her proposals follow a meeting with Sanders last month in Washington, where the aide said they discussed how to prioritize college-affordability issuesa key interest of young votersduring the general election. Clinton had just secured the nomination, but Sanders had vowed to press on to the Democratic National Convention that starts July 25.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-07-06/clinton-expands-college-cost-plan-to-appeal-to-sanders-supporters
UPDATE: ".@BernieSanders applauds Clinton for her new "bold" proposal on cost of college and says work combo of two campaigns."
https://twitter.com/maryaliceparks/status/750699781656223744
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Giving him anything only emboldens him to ask for more.
It is time to cut off negotiations. His sane supporters will vote for her anyway and the remaining ones won't vote for her no matter what she did.
Like Godfather II -- she should say, "Senator, you can have my answer right now"
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)This is the first time a loser is demanding stuff from a clear winner
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)I don't expect Sanders will endorse before then.
But maybe he'll endorse next week.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)If he doesn't endorse and drop out, he doesn't get a speaking slot at the convention
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And you'd have pictures beamed across the world of thousands of young people protesting the Democratic Convention, instead of the unified party we need. It;s not about what 'he' wants, its about what the large number of his supporters want, and how to ensure they mobilize for Clinton.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)without actual votes, grandstanding is just mental self-pleasuring.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Finding a beneficial common ground is good for the party.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)It is a lose lose situation.
GE is won in the center -- not in some manifestoland of high taxes and freebies for everyone.
95% of Sanders' supporters will vote for Clinton anyway. The rest were libertarian and RW trolls.
Whatever votes are lost by not agreeing to the extortion, about an equal number if not more will be lost from NPP voters.
Sanders should not put our candidate in a lose-lose situation.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)The primary was very close, and showed there is a real divide in the party. Finding a middle ground is essential, to ensure those.l people not only come out and vote but actually feel like the party still represents them so they campaign and work hard for us.
randome
(34,845 posts)...it doesn't hurt to listen and make decisions on good ideas. Pride needs to be taken off the table.
The only thing that we will need to suffer through will be his even more obnoxious supporters screeching, "See? We won! We won!"
When all of this could have been accomplished by working together toward a common goal in the first place. And they will have learned nothing about working as part of a team. But that's the way it goes sometimes.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)That would hamstring Hillary and give ammo to the right wingers.
randome
(34,845 posts)Clinton will find a way to tread that line, though.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Regardless of whether you supported a winning candidate or a losing candidate, do not prolong the agony of the last Democratic presidential primary by continuing to pick fights, place blame, tear down former primary candidates, bait former supporters, or do anything else to pour salt on old wounds.
We're supposed to be unified now, but that's not going to last long if you throw insults at a man many of us greatly admire.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)If people can't afford college they should become servants.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)What about give We the People useful and desirable THINGS?
Are we still in the ANTI-mode here? I thought things were supposed to CHANGE!
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)That's the way democracies are.
Elections have consequences.
elleng
(130,895 posts)You may want to ignore this:
WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders today welcomed a proposal by Secretary Hillary Clinton which combines the best features of plans that she and Sanders brought forth during the campaign to make higher education affordable for all and substantially reduces student debt.
As Ive traveled throughout the country during this campaign, I have heard over and over again from young people and their parents what the high cost of college and student debt is doing to their lives. For some, it means not being able to go to college at all, and thats the case for hundreds of thousands of high school graduates.
These are young people who will find it harder to make it into the middle class and fulfill their dreams. For others, it means graduating school deeply in debt, and being forced to pay off that debt year after year after year. And that may mean not being able to buy a home, get married or have kids.
I want to take this opportunity to applaud Secretary Clinton for the very bold initiative she has just brought forth today for the financing of higher education. This proposal combines some of the strongest ideas she fought for during the campaign with some of the principles that I fought for. The final product is a result of the work of both campaigns.
Let me be very clear. This proposal, when implemented, will revolutionize the funding of higher education in America, improve the economic future of our country and make life immediately better for tens of millions of people stuck with high levels of student debt.
This proposed legislation will provide free tuition at public colleges and universities for all families in America earning $125,000 a year or less 83 percent of our families.
In other words, the dream of higher education in America will become a reality for all, regardless of the income of ones family. This proposal will also provide very substantial relief for students and families carrying student debt.
In the year 2016, we should be encouraging our people to get the best education they can, not punishing them.
Our goal should be to have the best educated country in the world. In a highly-competitive global economy, it is insane that hundreds of thousands of bright young people are unable to afford the high cost of college and millions more leave school deeply in debt.
I thank Secretary Clinton for introducing this proposal which, in my view, will have a profound impact on the future of our country.
A Revolutionary Step Forward for Higher Education
https://berniesanders.com/press-release/revolutionary-step-forward-higher-education/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512240964
Response to elleng (Reply #29)
Post removed
HarmonyRockets
(397 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)given that a platform is just a piece of paper, and has no legislative weight. This is a huge budget expenditure, and budget expenditures are ultimately determined in the House of Representatives, where this proposal will go to die for the foreseeable future.
One thing that troubles me is the uninvestigated consequences for state university systems, which have always been controlled by the states. How will it affect hiring of tenured faculty? Will it lead to cutbacks in research, in ever-increasing use of adjuncts over tenured senior faculty? How will state systems come to accommodate more students, and potentially more unprepared students? Maybe these are all answerable questions, but to my knowledge, no one has looked at any of the policy implications here in detail.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)States already spend more on state universities than tuition brings in.
The federal matching funds may be enough to make up for the loss of tuition money.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)1. The source of those funds through Congressional action
2. The potential repercussions of policy
Simple answers to very complex issues are never a good idea.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Lots of luck with that. As I said, this is a fairly meaningless political sop. And without extensive analysis, it's not even something we should jump into blindly. But I kind of see that you don't get it. If you think legislation happens by magic, I can't help. If you don't care about extensive research into the potential pluses--and minuses--of what could happen, I can't help you either.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)jalan48
(13,863 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)remaining a vocal representative of the progressive liberal faction of the party, after all.
ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)Yet Another reason to support Hillary. I don't know that it's such a concession to Sanders--he seems quick to take credit--as it is acknowledging poorer students need college debt relief and this was a major part of their attraction to Sanders. Modifying the plan to engage and attract young voters, is also an excellent idea.
If Sanders and Clinton can work together on important issues it's fine with me.
College affordability was a major topic during a high-profile meeting Clinton held with Sanders last month, and the two strategized about ways to promote the issue during the general election and in the Democratic Party platform, a statement from Clinton's campaign said. Aides to to the two Democratic presidential candidates have been negotiating a unified plan in recent weeks.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/06/clinton-seeks-young-voters-with-wider-debt-free-college-plan/
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)If it's that cockamamie plan to pay 2/3 to schools if the state pays 1/3, then not as great. Since the "compromise" mentions students, I'm guessing the former. So
demwing
(16,916 posts)Answered - Because his principled tenacity is making a real difference in the lives of ordinary Americans, that's why!
GO BERNIE!