Does anyone have a compiled list of these email leaks...

[JaneyVee]

That supposedly show favoritism?

Not interested in combing through 30,000 boring emails.

[ismnotwasm]

1. That's what I want to know

I was digging through them and almost fell sleep.

[JaneyVee]

2. I find it a bit disgusting that...

A Democratic woman who survived breast cancer and worked her way up the ladder can't show her face at our convention because it will hurt the losing candidates fans feelings.

[Her Sister]

19. this!

[kstewart33]

45. Bingo.

I'm with you on this. DWS has made mistakes, but she's worked long and hard over many years for the Democratic Party. I'm glad that Hillary released a strong statement thanking her for her work and acknowledging her contributions to the party, and her future work for the Clinton campaign.

I hope she attends the convention and is recognized for all she's done for the party. I'd wager that the large majority of the delegates will show their appreciation for her work.

[BlueMTexpat]

48. This ...

[NWCorona]

3. I don't have a greatest hits link but here's a good one

"On Friday, Wikileaks published an email exchange between Western Regional Communicators Director for the Democratic Party Walter Garcia and DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda, in which Miranda requests an article critical of Bernie Sanders be covertly shared, “without attribution” to the DNC.

The article, by Nevada political reporter Jon Ralston, pushed a narrative that Bernie Sanders supporters were becoming violent and out of control and that Sanders was partly responsible."


http://gawker.com/dnc-communications-director-ordered-anti-sanders-articl-1784191906

[JaneyVee]

7. So nothing from DWS?

[NWCorona]

10. I didn't see DWS referenced in your OP. You merely asked for favoritism examples

But the question I have is. What is DWS's title? Does she have any responsibility for the position she holds?

The criticism seems fair to me.

[JaneyVee]

12. Pretty sure her responsibility isnt combing through 30,000 emails of everyone at DNC.

[NWCorona]

14. I didn't say she did but when something like this happens

The buck has to stop somewhere.

[elehhhhna]

55. Lol Don Quixote

Good luck with that.



Comment like that will get you banned a few weeks from now. that's my psychic prediction for du2016

[glennward]

50. And so this changed the votes...after the fact? Huh?

[joeybee12]

51. Where's the actual email exchange?

Not seeing it at the link.

[NWCorona]

53. There's a hyperlink

[Scuba]

4. They're interesting reading, Janey. The constant "we" when referring to. ..

... Hillary's campaign and "they" when referring to Bernie's is quite telling.

[JaneyVee]

5. "We" and "they" is exactly how Bernie framed it.

It was constantly "we" vs "they".

[Scuba]

8. Sorry, but that won't cover the obvious bias.

[JaneyVee]

9. And allegations of bias wont cover the 4 million vote spread.

[NWCorona]

11. What is that even supposed to mean?

[JaneyVee]

13. It means one email of alleged bias did nothing to...

Help Hillary or hurt Bernie.

[NWCorona]

16. Definitely more than one.

[ismnotwasm]

17. What percentage out of 30,000?

[NWCorona]

18. Lol! How am I supposed to know that? Especially when the op won't even do the legwork

A question was asked and I answered it.

[ismnotwasm]

21. Okey dokey

I don't know either. Reading through them is boring as hell though

[NWCorona]

23. I'm not even bothering. The ones that pop up are bad enough

[ismnotwasm]

36. Have you read them?

[NWCorona]

38. Some. Why do you ask?

[ismnotwasm]

41. I'm just not seeing or feeling it.

I don't see anything nefarious, and I'm tired of conspiracy theories

[NWCorona]

44. If that's how you feel I'm not gonna knock you for it.

[bobthedrummer]

25. It's New Democrat speak NWCorona-those of US that don't understand are like thought criminals

[kestrel91316]

15. Why are you not content that Hillary has the nomination?

Why the need to continue to insult Bernie and his supporters?

This exact sort of thing is why I left for the better part of a year.

[Her Sister]

22. WTF! Berners are the ones insisting that we discuss the Wikileaks!

Go and talk to them the same way! You big uniter you!

kestrel91316 (50,499 posts)
15. Why are you not content that Hillary has the nomination?

Why the need to continue to insult Bernie and his supporters?

This exact sort of thing is why I left for the better part of a year.

[BlueCaliDem]

52. K&R! Thank you, Her Sister! eom

[R B Garr]

20. fyi warning! I just got a post hidden for stating the obvious about the

other campaign's framing of issues that pretty much reflect what you just said. My response to the Admins was with that explanation and the obvious spamming of this non-issue that is going on now. The day before the convention, and this non-issue is non-stop spam here....hmmm.

[NWCorona]

6. Very

[bobthedrummer]

24. Reddit is helpful-you need to expend energy though by reading

https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCleaks

[bettyellen]

34. Lol!"the DNC controls the media" haha ha.

[HitchStop]

26. Supposedly? LOL

Actually as more and more info comes out, it looks even worse. In one email Schulze referred to Sanders as a liar. Supposedly? Really? LOL

[leftofcool]

54. Isn't this what you people have been calling Hillary for 9 months now?

Okay to call Hillary a liar but not Bernie? It figures!

[JaneyVee]

28. After going through all of that, it is innocuous and mundane...

Just the normal strategy bullshit on vetting donors and how to defeat Trump. Even the "mocking" one comes across as a joke. These people are co-workers. Of course the wikileaks headlines make them seem worse than they are because wikileaks is a rightwing foreign propaganda outfit.

[NWCorona]

29. And you are free to feel that way just as others are free to feel otherwise

[JaneyVee]

30. Ok, but truth and facts matter. Rightwing propaganda is neither.

[NWCorona]

31. And this isn't RW propaganda. These are actual DNC emails that are so bad that DWS just resigned

I've said from jump that these emails do little for me and the dump was politically designed to hurt Hillary but they definitely aren't nothing.

[ismnotwasm]

39. That pressure is from idiots who haven't actually read them

As well as NON-idiots who WANT them to mean something-- Going through them, and matching them with the "titles" was a interesting experience.

[bettyellen]

32. You disapprove of HRC helping get dem senators elected? Okay then.

And omg they are talking to the media! Who would have thought!

[NWCorona]

33. This is about DWS and the DNC not HRC directly.

But what about when the DNC or DWS supports a Republican over a Democrat? That's what I disapprove of

[bettyellen]

35. The titles you added to the emails are deceptive - the were talking about following rules and you

Made it seem like they were breaking them.
And the DNC "controlling the media", that is ridiculous. Sanders got more and better treatment in the press.

[NWCorona]

37. I didn't add. It was a copy and paste and if I wasn't clear on that I apologize.

I have to much to much on my plate to compile a list like that.

[bettyellen]

40. Well the titles are deceptive so why'd you post this Rw spin?

For instance someone asks them to "pull" a videotape and transcript from a segment on TV so they can view it- but their wording sounds like the asked the station to "pull" it off the air. That's a deliberate misrepresentation, and a RW smear.

You should delete that crap.

[NWCorona]

42. Provide examples

[bettyellen]

43. For instance someone asks them to "pull" a videotape and transcript from a segment on TV so they...

...they can view it- but their wording sounds like the asked the station to "pull" it off the air. That's a deliberate misrepresentation, and a RW smear.

Another one all edging their control the media.
Another one accusing them of trying to violate the Hatch Act when the opposite was true.

You should delete that crap. It's RW bullshit.

[NWCorona]

46. Do you mean this one?

DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107

Here's a paste of the email


Video Request: msnbc right now

From:[e-mail] To: [e-mail] Date: 2016-05-18 18:27 Subject: Video Request: msnbc right now

Can we pull the commentary segment right now on msnbc? Talking about the DNC and the relationship between the DNC and the Clinton campaign With rush transcript please once it wraps up. Christina Freundlich DNC Deputy National Press Secretary

How does that conflict with the description?

[bettyellen]

47. Is getting a copy of video to view somehow nefarious? That and others sound like

They are somehow pulling strings at the network. They meet with them no doubt, as part of their job.
Somehow they should not be watching the newsordiscussing things with journalists? Seriously?
What a bunch of nothing designed to make angry idiots even angrier.Shameful.

[NWCorona]

49. I just extended an olive branch