Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:12 PM Jul 2016

How is it going to work with Vermont moving for nomination by acclamation?

This does not make a lot of sense to me. All of the pledged delegates from Vermont are Bernie delegates. How will the campaigns get them to agree to move for nomination by acclamation?

I can't imagine anyone thinks it is a good idea to have a superdelegate make that motion, especially a superdelegate from Vermont.

The only way I see this working is if Bernie does it himself.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How is it going to work with Vermont moving for nomination by acclamation? (Original Post) democrattotheend Jul 2016 OP
I did not know that was in the works? emulatorloo Jul 2016 #1
There are a couple of threads on it democrattotheend Jul 2016 #2
Really? I did not hear that democrattotheend Jul 2016 #4
Thanks for the link above! Sorry can't remember where I read that emulatorloo Jul 2016 #9
Wikipedia list of super delegates shows Bernie to vote for Clinton. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #23
I think either Bernie has to do it, or they have to just let the voting run its course geek tragedy Jul 2016 #3
I agree democrattotheend Jul 2016 #6
I imagine the VT delegation will line up behind what he wants geek tragedy Jul 2016 #12
They might actually be upset/embarrassed about the behavior of his more vocal auntpurl Jul 2016 #24
Vermont will go last leftofcool Jul 2016 #5
I understand that democrattotheend Jul 2016 #8
and, what's the point of acclamation if she already has a majority? geek tragedy Jul 2016 #14
To make it unanimous, I guess democrattotheend Jul 2016 #16
exactly, you can just see it geek tragedy Jul 2016 #17
Even if 300 Sanders delegates BOO LoverOfLiberty Jul 2016 #21
Symbolic gesture for party unity. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #26
I just don't see all the Sanders delegates agreeing to have their votes at the convention not count. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #28
Fair enough and totally get what yr saying. Agreed on emotional investment emulatorloo Jul 2016 #29
Is Senator Sanders a superdelegate? lapucelle Jul 2016 #7
Yes democrattotheend Jul 2016 #10
Yes emulatorloo Jul 2016 #11
Yes, he is. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #13
Establishment? JTFrog Jul 2016 #25
Hillary got the majority of votes. They will be the last to report their votes. They finish the math onehandle Jul 2016 #15
They will not go through the entire roster of states? lapucelle Jul 2016 #18
See the word 'last' in my reply title. onehandle Jul 2016 #22
Putting her over the top is not the same thing as nomination by acclamation democrattotheend Jul 2016 #19
Hillary got no elected delegates from Vermont democrattotheend Jul 2016 #20
All states will report their votes including Vermont who REQUESTED TO GO LAST. onehandle Jul 2016 #27

emulatorloo

(44,121 posts)
1. I did not know that was in the works?
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:14 PM
Jul 2016

Can you please tell me a little more?

(I do recall reading that sanders as a super delegate is voting HRC)

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
2. There are a couple of threads on it
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jul 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512303684

They say Vermont is going to go last and move for nomination of Hillary by acclamation after all of the delegates have voted. But I don't know how they will convince the delegates from Vermont to do that.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
4. Really? I did not hear that
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jul 2016

He was saying that he wanted his delegates to vote for him, to show what we accomplished as a movement. It seems odd that he would say that but vote for HRC himself.

emulatorloo

(44,121 posts)
9. Thanks for the link above! Sorry can't remember where I read that
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jul 2016

but makes sense to me in light of his endorsement. If I can dig something up will post a link.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. I think either Bernie has to do it, or they have to just let the voting run its course
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jul 2016

and have a final number to show that everyone's votes were counted.

Full transparency, or a big bear hug between the rivals.

A motion on the floor could backfire spectacularly with claims of "rigged!!!!"

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
6. I agree
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:18 PM
Jul 2016

The only other way I could see this working is if Bernie convinces all of the pledged delegates from Vermont to get behind this. Unlikely, but possible, since many of them are probably people he knows.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. I imagine the VT delegation will line up behind what he wants
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:20 PM
Jul 2016

he probably knows all of them, and they don't want to be the turd in his punch bowl

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
24. They might actually be upset/embarrassed about the behavior of his more vocal
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jul 2016

supporters. They might want to protect Bernie and the movement from any more booing etc. I remember Cali was always very supportive and protective of Bernie being able to do what he needed to do for political expediency, and she had no patience with his more militant supporters who didn't want him to give an inch re; endorsing Hillary etc.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
5. Vermont will go last
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jul 2016

After all the votes are counted, Hillary will be ahead, Vermont will then vote to name Hillary the nominee by acclamation.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
8. I understand that
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jul 2016

But given how strongly most Bernie delegates feel about the roll call, how will the campaign get the Vermont delegates to make this motion?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. and, what's the point of acclamation if she already has a majority?
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jul 2016

seems a little jumbled, though I'm sure they'll get it sorted out

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
16. To make it unanimous, I guess
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jul 2016

Personally I think they should just let the roll call play out and not stage some gimmick to short circuit it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
17. exactly, you can just see it
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:24 PM
Jul 2016

Vermont delegate: "I move to nominate Hillary Rodham Clinton by unanimous consent."

About 300 Sanders delegates: "BOOOOOOOO!!!"

LoverOfLiberty

(1,438 posts)
21. Even if 300 Sanders delegates BOO
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jul 2016

which is sounds like that is way too high of a number, the other 4,700 will be cheering.

emulatorloo

(44,121 posts)
26. Symbolic gesture for party unity.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jul 2016

As I understand it, CA delegates were the sources of loudest boos yesterday. If the CA delegates boo, no body will be able to hear them over the cheers.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
28. I just don't see all the Sanders delegates agreeing to have their votes at the convention not count.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:33 PM
Jul 2016

They have a lot of emotion invested in having their votes counted at the roll call--having a motion to have those votes all get converted into Clinton votes seems like an unnecessary risk.

emulatorloo

(44,121 posts)
29. Fair enough and totally get what yr saying. Agreed on emotional investment
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:37 PM
Jul 2016

Hadn't planned on watching roll call, but now I must to see how it all plays out.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
10. Yes
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jul 2016

So maybe he is planning to do what Hillary did, but do so after the roll call has played out. I think that is the wiser move. If the full roll call does not play out his delegates will feel it was rigged and are more likely to be disruptive again.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
15. Hillary got the majority of votes. They will be the last to report their votes. They finish the math
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jul 2016

The vote will be complete and they will announce that she has won.

How is this confusing?

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
19. Putting her over the top is not the same thing as nomination by acclamation
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:24 PM
Jul 2016

Nomination by acclamation means they suspend the roll call and nominate her unanimously.

If the plan is to have Vermont be the state that puts her over the top, that is a really stupid idea. Hillary got NO pledged delegates in Vermont. Having Vermont put her over the top would mean an unelected superdelegate supporting Hillary from a state that gave Bernie over 87% in the primary puts her over. Terrible optics, unless Bernie does it himself.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
20. Hillary got no elected delegates from Vermont
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jul 2016

So if Vermont puts her over, that means unelected superdelegates who are going against 87% of the voters in their state put her over. That is a TERRIBLE idea. The only way I could see that working is if Bernie himself casts the vote to put her over or moves for nomination by acclamation.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
27. All states will report their votes including Vermont who REQUESTED TO GO LAST.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jul 2016

Then, the math over, they move to finish the equation by acclamation to say she won.

It's not difficult...


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How is it going to work w...