2016 Postmortem

onehandle

(51,122 posts) Fri Aug 5, 2016, 05:07 PM Aug 2016

Who's The Sleaziest Family Of Grifter Opportunists?

8 votes, 0 passes \| Time left: Unlimited
	The Palins
	5 (63%)
	The Trumps
	3 (38%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who's The Sleaziest Family Of Grifter Opportunists? (Original Post) onehandle Aug 2016 OP

It's really hard to choose. Lifelong Protester Aug 2016 #1

I think Bush's should get their own slot. tavernier Aug 2016 #2

Point well taken but at least they are not promoting Trump emulatorloo Aug 2016 #3

The Palins are backwater primitives; the Trumps are insane... VOX Aug 2016 #4

The Palins are amateurs. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #5

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)

1. It's really hard to choose.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Fri Aug 5, 2016, 05:09 PM

Aug 2016

But I went with the 'du jour' family of grafter opportunists.

tavernier

(12,392 posts)

2. I think Bush's should get their own slot.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Fri Aug 5, 2016, 05:14 PM

Aug 2016

No?

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)

3. Point well taken but at least they are not promoting Trump

Reply to tavernier (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 5, 2016, 07:21 PM

Aug 2016

VOX

(22,976 posts)

4. The Palins are backwater primitives; the Trumps are insane...

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Fri Aug 5, 2016, 07:36 PM

Aug 2016

They are connected to some genuine power and are involved in so many schemes and legal battles, etc. Wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to learn that the Trumps have had certain individuals, um, "disappeared" every now and then.

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)

5. The Palins are amateurs.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Fri Aug 5, 2016, 07:36 PM

Aug 2016

She grifted some clothes then had to pay it back.

The Trumps are grifting millions by charging the campaign from Trump held companies for "services rendered". All completely legal and legit.

Reply to this discussion