Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrump really, really wants to debate HRC, but he has, you know, conditions...
Donald Trump said Tuesday that he will commit to three debates this fall with Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, but may try to re-negotiate the terms that have been agreed upon by a bipartisan commission.
I will absolutely do three debates, Trump told TIME in a phone interview. I want to debate very badly. But I have to see the conditions.
<snip>
Trump said he reserved the right to object to the commissions choice of moderators, which have not yet been announced. The choice has stirred controversy before. In 2012, Republicans bristled after CNNs Candy Crowley inserted herself into an exchange between Presidential Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney.
Ill have to see who the moderators are. Yeah, I would say that certain moderators would be unacceptable, absolutely, Trump said. I did very well in the debates on the primaries. According to the polls, I won all of them. So I look forward to the debates. But, yeah, I want to have fair moderators I will demand fair moderators.
More Tweaseling here:
http://time.com/4445182/donald-trump-debate-terms/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1001 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump really, really wants to debate HRC, but he has, you know, conditions... (Original Post)
cali
Aug 2016
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. I bet Megyn Kelly will be available nt
cali
(114,904 posts)3. The Tweaseling over the debates is going to a lot of fun to watch.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,706 posts)2. "Fair monitors" like Hannity and Limbaugh?
kimbutgar
(21,155 posts)4. I'd like to see Hannity and Rachel Maddow being moderators
Cheeto gets is fawning moderator and we get a moderator who will ask real questions.
cali
(114,904 posts)5. No. Just no. Sean Hannity couldn't pose a cogent question if his life depended on it.
He couldn't even read one.
forgotmylogin
(7,529 posts)8. Hannity: "Mr. Trump...when you wake up in the morning...
...do you sometimes ask yourself "How freaking awesome am I?" And if you do, what do you answer yourself?"
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)9. Hannity would give Clinton all "gotcha" questions
Do you agree with XYZ?
Well, that was said by Bill Clinton (or Barack Obama) if she disagrees.
Well, that was said by (some dictator or terrorist) if she agrees.
cali
(114,904 posts)6. Why do the moderators have to be TV talking heads?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)7. "I want to debate very badly" ... I'm sure he will.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)10. Trump will not debate Hillary.
He says he wants to debate "very badly" (WTF) but wait - the conditions will prevent him from doing so and he'll stall all the way to November.
cali
(114,904 posts)11. He's stuck between Trump Tower and hard shoals of general election reality
He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't, and I'm damned if I know which would be worse for him.
And I would get out the guys in chicken suits again.