Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 03:28 PM Aug 2016

The Trump-Clinton divide on little people. (according to a business columnist)

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2016/08/12/trump-clinton-economic-plans-little-people-detroit-column/88613520/

All it takes, he seemed to say, are a few of these big broad strokes and all will be well. Or as Trump himself put it, "I want to jump-start America and it won't even be that hard."

By contrast, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s plan outlined Thursday in nearby Warren seems to accept that, yes, it will be hard. Therefore she attacks the problems at ground level — down where entrepreneurs need working capital and commuters need reliable public transit and school kids need high-speed broadband.

Trump’s plan, with its emphasis on tax cuts and getting those intrusive government regulators off our backs, comes from somewhere high atop one of Trump’s skyscrapers. It’s a view from the boardroom, from a place where the big deals are done and the little people remain out of sight.

But Clinton’s plan seemed to acknowledge each and every one of those little people. She hopes to counsel first-time homeowners on handling debt. She wants to put at-risk youths to work, and to help returning offenders find jobs, and to bankroll entrepreneurs with their dreams. Her plan has a granular quality; on public transit, for example, she focuses down to the level of bike and pedestrian lanes needed in cities.

There’s an old saying that nothing works but that everything might: that no one silver-bullet solution will turn things around but that if we try 100 different things and each one moves the needle just a bit, then we might make real progress. That seems to be Clinton’s approach.

SNIP
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Trump-Clinton divide on little people. (according to a business columnist) (Original Post) pnwmom Aug 2016 OP
K&R. nt tblue37 Aug 2016 #1
"little people"? Mass Aug 2016 #2
The writer talks of Trump being high in a skyscraper, looking down on the little people. pnwmom Aug 2016 #3
I thought this would be an article about midget voters... jcgoldie Aug 2016 #4

Mass

(27,315 posts)
2. "little people"?
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 04:25 PM
Aug 2016

Happy he likes the detail of the Clinton's plan, but frankly, the elitism in this piece stinks.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
3. The writer talks of Trump being high in a skyscraper, looking down on the little people.
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 04:43 PM
Aug 2016

That's how they appear from the top of the Trump Tower.

But Hillary is down there on the ground, one of the little people. They don't look little to her -- and they have big problems.

The elitism you object to is the elitism of Trump, and those who support him.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
4. I thought this would be an article about midget voters...
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 04:53 PM
Aug 2016

Sorry in advance to anyone finds that term offensive.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Trump-Clinton divide ...