Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:32 PM Nov 2012

The demographic changes which gave Obama his win.

I found this interesting.

This year, Mr. Obama managed to win a second term despite winning only 39 percent of white voters and 44 percent of voters older than 65, according to exit polls not yet finalized conducted by Edison Research.
White men made up only about one-quarter of Mr. Obama’s voters.
In the House of Representatives next year, for the first time, white men will make up less than half of the Democratic caucus.

snip:
Republicans increasingly rely on older white voters.

snip:
“The minority population is increasing, and the white population is stagnant.”

Info above gleaned from this article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/obamas-victory-presents-gop-with-demographic-test.html?ref=politics&_r=1&&pagewanted=all

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The demographic changes which gave Obama his win. (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 OP
I find it repugnant frazzled Nov 2012 #1
A John2 Nov 2012 #2
I find it repugnant that the media spends so much time talking about what % of the white vote IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ Nov 2012 #3

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. I find it repugnant
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:39 PM
Nov 2012

If Democrats are winning the majority of the country, which happens to have a changing demographics, it is because of their POLICIES, not identity politics. And by the way, a huge part of the electorate that does not include white men is WOMEN. Women of all colors, races, and religions.

Same with the Democratic delegation in the House. Boo hoo, white men. Not only do you have Latino and African American colleagues (not that any Democrats are complaining about that), but many of the new House members who were elected were WOMEN.

Republicans could win these demographic sectors if their policies were not so antediluvian and offensive.

PS: Minorities have been voting for white men for president since forever ... because the only people who have run for president were white men. Let's get over this.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
2. A
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:01 PM
Nov 2012

secret to the GOP. It is not about the color of your skin but about Policies with with minorities. You could have ran Clarence Thomas against President Obama and still loss. Even if you ran Clarence Thomas against a Bill Clinton, Thomas still wouldn't have won the Black vote. It is about Policies Stupid!

 
3. I find it repugnant that the media spends so much time talking about what % of the white vote
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:06 PM
Nov 2012

each candidate got. Are white votes worth more than black or Latino or Asian or Jewish votes? Do they sparkle better? I don't think so, so the media's obsession with the white vote breakdown is stupid.

If you are a non-white U.S. citizen, you have the same right to vote as a white U.S. citizen. Your vote matters just as much.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The demographic changes w...