2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWaPo -- yes there's a vast right-wing conspiracy, but it's Hillary's fault
Hillary Clinton was right about the vast right-wing conspiracy. Heres why it exists.
By Karen Tumulty September 2
Clinton arrives at the courthouse in January 1996.
{snip}
Whitewater had been an issue in the 1992 presidential campaign. More recently, questions had arisen whether the land deal and the Clintons might be linked to the collapse of a savings and loan.
Stephanopoulos and David Gergen, another senior adviser, were internal rivals at the time, who agreed on almost nothing. But both argued for full disclosure of the records. After a few days of rough coverage, they confidently predicted, the story would go away as the press corps discovered there was nothing sinister to the land deal and turned its attention elsewhere.
The president would not budge and both of them knew why. Hillary Clinton is a woman of many strengths and virtues, but like all of us, she also has some blind spots, Gergen said in a recent interview. She does not see the world in the same way that others do, when it comes to transparency and accountability.
{snip}
The fallout from that decision to stonewall would be enormous. Pressure built for the appointment of a prosecutor, first Robert B. Fiske Jr., and then Kenneth W. Starr, who had been solicitor general under former president George Bush.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-was-right-about-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy-heres-why-it-exists/2016/09/02/4a5e0fba-6879-11e6-99bf-f0cf3a6449a6_story.html?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na
.......................
Wow.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)She didn't know her place -- she definitely asked for it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Pretty twisted.
synergie
(1,901 posts)she was responsible for pretty much everything, her votes as Senator had more power than anyone else, it's her own fault that all these angry men feel the need to keep lying about her and attacking her, and the angry women who have felt the need to follow suit are clearly doing so because she's asking for it.
<sigh>
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Oh wait . . .
underpants
(182,788 posts)They came up with a byzantine theory of how it all worked: Unverified stories would originate at right-wing organizations, find their way onto the Internet, be picked up by conservative publications or London tabloids, make their way back into the U.S. media, then trigger congressional inquiries at which point, they would become legitimate fodder for mainstream news organizations.
NBachers
(17,108 posts)*vote*
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)From Media Matters -
The Problem With The Politico Report On The Clinton Foundation
....snip.....
Even though the article doesnt show any legal wrongdoing, it still suggests that the behavior in question is sketchy -- which is the hallmark of what Voxs former chief political correspondent Jonathan Allen called the Clinton rules in 2015.
These rules have permeated media coverage of the Clintons during Hillary Clintons candidacy. According to Allen, many in media inherently assume [Hillary Clinton] is acting in bad faith and that when the Clintons aren't forthcoming and sometimes, even when they are they're covering something up.
Media Matters has so much on their BLOG today - this is just one article...of importance..
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/09/01/problem-politico-report-clinton-foundation/212819
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Cause if they had released all this information, republicans would have just let it go.
Yeah, thats what would have happened.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)Teasing those lustful Republicans with a provocative story, but cruelly never letting them reach climax!
Mass
(27,315 posts)Clinton Foundation, and, even though he was using the money for its intended use, the media spent their day implying something was wrong.
Go figure.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)that it would go on and on and on and on, for his entire presidency.