2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAs Clinton answers questions, I wonder if this is what she's thinking...
I wonder if she's going to start giving press conferences on a regular basis, accomplishing a few ends:
1) Getting some much needed airtime
2) Hitting Trump, possibly provoking a reaction?
3) Forcing Trump to follow suit and become more accessible himself, and also increasing the odds that Trump will say something outrageously stupid. (The more he talks, the more likely his big-ass mouth makes news)
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Too much Hillary too soon, and people get complacent. In the next two months we will be seeing, and hearing a lot more from her.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)But when you do give them Hillary, give it all you've got.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)and then having a flying political advertisement that the networks have no choice but to put on air.
Seems to be working!!! She played the media perfectly.
oasis
(49,383 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)on his plane too? Everything she does that he likes, he copies. At the same time, every evil and criminal thought he has he projects onto her.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)If there is any one consistent negative for HRC is that she is seen as secretive and unwilling to answer questions. What is sad is that she is extremely well spoken.
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)I would probably be so tired of all the nonsense that I would want to limit my time with the media until necessary, but then they would complain about how I am secretive and unapproachable, then I would want to not engage in their collective stupidity, and they would continue to harp on my secretive nature.
Hillary cannot win sometimes so she really has to pick her battles so that they will to the most good in the best way. If she is out too much too early, then she is an attention seeker just trying to hog the spotlight. If she is not "accessible enough" then we have what we have been seeing. She has to be strategic, but in being strategic, she is written about as being "secretive".
karynnj
(59,503 posts)(I am not criticizing her here, the same could be said of most of my favorite statesmen/politicians) In her case, there are things she has done because she really does not want the transparency that insures good government practices. Anything she can do to signal that though this has often been observed in the past, she will NOT do so as President. (One good step is to say that any rules that Obama has changed in the State Department and elsewhere will be kept when she is President. )