Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,187 posts)
Tue Sep 20, 2016, 02:30 PM Sep 2016

First Presidential Debate To Focus On Vague Platitudes

"On Monday, Sept. 26th, the nation will come together as one to watch the first of three presidential debates between Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump. The candidates have just a few days of preparation left, and to better facilitate that, the debate’s moderator, NBC News’ Lester Holt, has announced the topic areas that he will be covering over the course of the 90-minute tilt.

Those topics are... well, pretty vague! Here’s the announcement from the Commission on Presidential Debates:

Subject to possible changes because of news developments, the topics for the September 26 debate are as follows, not necessarily to be brought up in this order:

America’s Direction
Achieving Prosperity
Securing America

The debate will be held on Monday, September 26 at Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY. The format calls for six 15-minute time segments. Two 15-minute segments will focus on each of the topics listed above.

So, apparently, the debate will double as each candidate’s college admissions essay.

These aren’t debate topics, they’re platitudes. They are the sort of subjects on which sixth graders write penmanship themes. How does knowing this help the candidates prepare for the debate? How does knowing this enable the debate’s audience to be more informed about the proceedings? Literally who is this announcement for?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/presidential-debate-topics_us_57e14611e4b0071a6e097971?section=&

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rumdude

(448 posts)
1. I know they sound lame
Tue Sep 20, 2016, 02:34 PM
Sep 2016

but the Hillary team should be able to marshal its own vision for each broad subject, and then work in their policy and facts.

This is about painting a picture; it's debate 101.

I hope they know what they're doing.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Tailor made for a candidate like Trump who lives and breathes vague platitudes.
Tue Sep 20, 2016, 03:42 PM
Sep 2016

Those subjects just also happen to be the names of Super PACs.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
8. I'm kind of fine with this as long as specific questions are asked.
Tue Sep 20, 2016, 04:26 PM
Sep 2016


Without a roadmap, Kelly Anne Conway isn't going to be able to feed Trump lines for him to remember and recite. He knows next to nothing and a specific question will surely stump him like the CC forum did. That relies on Holt to answer specific questions and to press for answers.

On the other hand, Holt may just let Trump avoid specifics thanks to the vagueness of these "themes". Hell, it should have just been "everything".

still_one

(92,187 posts)
9. If it allows trump to avoid specifics it will be up to Hillary to give specifics, and demand
Tue Sep 20, 2016, 04:43 PM
Sep 2016

specifics from Trump

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»First Presidential Debate...