LATimes Editorial: Clinton would be a smart, pragmatic president. Trump would be a catastrophe.

[riversedge]

Now this is a grand way to start the weekend before the big debate!


Tweet:
Los Angeles Times Verified account
?@latimes

Editorial board: Clinton would be a smart, pragmatic president. Trump would be a catastrophe. http://lat.ms/2cIjDaZ



http://www.trbimg.com/img-57e47275/turbine/la-1474589450-snap-photo/650/650x366
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21. (M
att Rourke / Associated Press)


The Times Editorial Board

American voters have a clear choice on Nov. 8. We can elect an experienced, thoughtful and deeply knowledgeable public servant or a thin-skinned demagogue who is unqualified and unsuited to be president.

Donald J. Trump, a billionaire businessman and television personality, is the latter. He has never held elected office and has shown himself temperamentally unfit to do so. He has run a divisive, belligerent, dishonest campaign, repeatedly aligning himself with racists, strongmen and thugs while maligning or dismissing large segments of the American public. Electing Trump could be catastrophic for the nation...............................

[Funtatlaguy]

1. Not really surprising from that paper.

Will be interesting to see if there are a lot of Repub leaning editorial boards that either endorse Hillary or make no endorsement.
Not that I think newspaper endorsements influence many voters especially at the Prez level.