Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA principled option for U.S. president: Endorsing Gary Johnson, Libertarian
Chicago TribuneAs Nov. 8 looms, a dismayed, disconsolate America waits and wonders: What is it about 2016?
How has our country fallen so inescapably into political and policy gridlock? How did pandering to aggrieved niche groups and seducing blocs of angry voters replace working toward solutions as the coin of our governing class? How could the Democratic and Republican parties stagger so far from this nation's political mainstream?
And the most pressing question: What should tens of millions of voters who yearn for answers do with two major-party candidates they disdain? Polls show an unprecedented number of people saying they wish they had another choice.
This is the moment to look at the candidates on this year's ballot. This is the moment to see this election as not so much about them as about the American people and where their country is heading. And this is the moment to rebuke the Republican and Democratic parties.
How has our country fallen so inescapably into political and policy gridlock? How did pandering to aggrieved niche groups and seducing blocs of angry voters replace working toward solutions as the coin of our governing class? How could the Democratic and Republican parties stagger so far from this nation's political mainstream?
And the most pressing question: What should tens of millions of voters who yearn for answers do with two major-party candidates they disdain? Polls show an unprecedented number of people saying they wish they had another choice.
This is the moment to look at the candidates on this year's ballot. This is the moment to see this election as not so much about them as about the American people and where their country is heading. And this is the moment to rebuke the Republican and Democratic parties.
The Tribune has traditionally endorsed Republicans in the past, although in 2008 and in 2012 it endorsed Chicago's own Barack Obama. In May, the Chicago paper endorsed Florida Sen. Marco Rubio in the Republican primary, and declined to endorse either Democratic candidate. In March, it wrote that it would not endorse Trump under any circumstances.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/09/chicago-tribune-endorses-gary-johnson-228951
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 358 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A principled option for U.S. president: Endorsing Gary Johnson, Libertarian (Original Post)
brooklynite
Sep 2016
OP
roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)1. Please
Vote Hillary!
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)2. Endorse a political philosophy thatmakes sense only in college dorms,
a philosophy that cannot be shown to have worked anywhere,
and endorse a candidate as ill-informed as Donald Trump?
The Tribune is a far right newspaper with less and less connection to reality.
emulatorloo
(44,267 posts)3. Fuck that noise.
stopbush
(24,398 posts)4. Principled? Principled would have taken into account Johnson's
stupidity, as displayed in his most-recent gaffes.
Just another RW editorial board stamping its feet because the R candidate they'd like to endorse is an asshole.