2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's what I don't understand about 'microphone gate'
Lester Holt heard him just fine. Even sitting relatively close to someone using a mic, you can usually tell if it is working, or not. I am sure if Lester had noticed anything wrong, he would have spoken up.
If the people in the studio audience couldn't hear him, why didn't they speak up? I suspect his verbal projection works just as well as his psychological projection.
Did the microphone make those sniffing noises? No.
And would a better functioning mic have made ANY difference in what he said, how he said it, or in the faces he made? No.
He is just a whiny-assed cry baby.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)And Trump heard his opponent and the moderator...we know from all his interruptions, so I don't see that this changes anything.
LiberalFighter
(51,084 posts)duncang
(1,907 posts)If there was a difference in volume in the hall it was very little.
C_U_L8R
(45,020 posts)I'm not buying this.
unblock
(52,317 posts)Siwsan
(26,289 posts)What a fool he be.
the mic made him say it?
Siwsan
(26,289 posts)(My apologist to John Irving)
underpants
(182,878 posts)That's how things work with some people. Throw a fit and you get what you want just to shut you up.
Siwsan
(26,289 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)He blamed the sniffing on the mike, which would mean it's picking up too much.
Simultaneously, he claimed he had to get down into it because it wasn't picking up enough.
Howler Monkey gonna howl.
rurallib
(62,448 posts)People are running from him like he has the plague
PJMcK
(22,048 posts)Audio can be very tricky for a number of reasons.
There are a lot of things that can affect an audio signal from the microphone, through the cables, mixer and outboard gear, into an amplifier and then sent to speakers.
In the case of Monday night's debate, each candidate had a single microphone but this would have been mixed and split into several busses or feeds. One buss would be the audio sent to the broadcast feed. Another buss would go to the speaker system in the auditorium. There were probably other feeds for other uses.
Accordingly, it's not really surprising that the television audio was fine but that there could have been something wrong in the house system. On another thread, I asked DUer brooklynite, who attended the debate, if he had any observations about the audio but I haven't received a response yet.
It's really irrelevant because the television audience heard and saw Mr. Trump just fine. Additionally, he couldn't have known about the audio problems until after the event so it wouldn't have affected his performance anyway.
Siwsan
(26,289 posts)Hopefully you will get a response.