Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Siwsan

(26,289 posts)
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 06:42 PM Sep 2016

Here's what I don't understand about 'microphone gate'

Lester Holt heard him just fine. Even sitting relatively close to someone using a mic, you can usually tell if it is working, or not. I am sure if Lester had noticed anything wrong, he would have spoken up.

If the people in the studio audience couldn't hear him, why didn't they speak up? I suspect his verbal projection works just as well as his psychological projection.

Did the microphone make those sniffing noises? No.

And would a better functioning mic have made ANY difference in what he said, how he said it, or in the faces he made? No.

He is just a whiny-assed cry baby.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
1. Holt and Hillary - as well as millions at home heard him just fine
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 06:46 PM
Sep 2016

And Trump heard his opponent and the moderator...we know from all his interruptions, so I don't see that this changes anything.

underpants

(182,878 posts)
8. The Connission was just appeasing Trump's campaign with their statement
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:26 PM
Sep 2016

That's how things work with some people. Throw a fit and you get what you want just to shut you up.

Siwsan

(26,289 posts)
10. And I, for one, am sick and tired of the media validating this guy's psychotic behavior!
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:29 PM
Sep 2016
Grrrrrrrr!!

JHB

(37,161 posts)
11. It's very simple: It's bullshit...
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:40 PM
Sep 2016

He blamed the sniffing on the mike, which would mean it's picking up too much.

Simultaneously, he claimed he had to get down into it because it wasn't picking up enough.


Howler Monkey gonna howl.

PJMcK

(22,048 posts)
14. I posted this earlier on another thread
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 08:08 PM
Sep 2016

Audio can be very tricky for a number of reasons.

There are a lot of things that can affect an audio signal from the microphone, through the cables, mixer and outboard gear, into an amplifier and then sent to speakers.

In the case of Monday night's debate, each candidate had a single microphone but this would have been mixed and split into several busses or feeds. One buss would be the audio sent to the broadcast feed. Another buss would go to the speaker system in the auditorium. There were probably other feeds for other uses.

Accordingly, it's not really surprising that the television audio was fine but that there could have been something wrong in the house system. On another thread, I asked DUer brooklynite, who attended the debate, if he had any observations about the audio but I haven't received a response yet.

It's really irrelevant because the television audience heard and saw Mr. Trump just fine. Additionally, he couldn't have known about the audio problems until after the event so it wouldn't have affected his performance anyway.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's what I don't under...