2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC Staffers let Kaine down last night.
Jen Palmieri and Karen Finney had the primary responsibility of prepping Kaine.
Both are veterans with a lot of tv experience.
Finney even hosted an MSNBC show fir a while.
They should have known all about optics.
They should have talked about the intimate setting of a sit down debate.
There is NO way that Kaine should have interrupted like that.
Just let Pence drone on.
Instead, the media was given its narrative on a silver platter that Kaine was too pushy, not calm and poised like the former radio talk show Pence.
All that being said, Kaine did win on substance.
He effectively attacked Trump and defended Clinton.
Whereas, Pence didn't defend Trump, for reasons known only to him.
By Sunday's next Prez debate, this will be forgotten.
But, Kaine could have won on BOTH style AND substance if he had been prepped better.
Opportunity missed and I blame HRC's staff as much or more than I blame Kaine.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Kaine was wound a little tight the first half, but he did fine overall, and beat Pence where it mattered.... On Trump. This won't move the needle either way.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)The most important thing for Kaine to do was to make sure that Pence didn't get a chance to sell Trump to America. By throwing Pence off he stopped any chance Pence had of unchallenged Trump commercials.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)Kaine's interruptions were the only thing that stopped Pence's side-stepping Kaine's challenges to defend Trump's statements.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)He did interrupt too much, but that was the format and the moderator was useless.
Native
(5,942 posts)that Pence was throwing out a lie a second? With that record, I'm surprised Kaine didn't interrupt more often. Like Mook once said, if you have to spend your allotted time refuting the lies of your opponent because the moderator isn't doing it, then that eats into the time you're given to present your own vision. Bottom line, interrupting would be the only way to call a lie a lie without having it eat into your own time.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)she had a list of questions, and she was going to get through them come hell or high water!
EV_Ares
(6,587 posts)better but he did a good job nevertheless. He reminded everyone who is at the top of the republican ticket & what he is like.
He got that out. As for mannerisms, calmness maybe Pence got this there but for substance Kaine won. That said, it appears that Pence was the choice for winner, but when a debate is won by 4 or 5 points. That is like he said, she said.
Like CNN said they think that when a little more time comes, it may be that Kaine won because fact checking is going to show Pence lied on a lot of things trying to defend Trump where he really failed.
AmericanActivist
(1,019 posts)if he was polite and patient waiting his turn he would look weak. Pence, like Trump, and Republicans, and Fox News staff all interrupt and talk over people and ramble and disregard time; for years, decades even, Democrats were polite and these other people ran roughshod over them. Kaine did well. He hammered Pence with facts.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)yardwork
(61,607 posts)I'm sure that Kaine was told to be forceful.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)And connected with the bigger home audience.
Her language was tight on making her views relevant to you.
Kaine was speaking to the moderator off to the side
and was talking a bit abstractly about policy. .
Not so much 'hey here's why this is important to you at home' or 'here's what's in it for you'
And the ugh, interrupting.
Pence spoke into the camera but was a bit creepy with his gosh shucks schtick.
And lied his ass off to make their heinous positions seem kinder gentler
and covered with caring goo. The old Shrub trick.
Overall Kaine lost some style points that he shouldn't have...
But on the issues, he won (he just could have been better).
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Expecting Rain
(811 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 5, 2016, 09:32 PM - Edit history (1)
...but you're right about Kaine. He was situated screen-left, yet his eyes line virtually the whole night (with the exceptions of the times he looked over at Pense) were to look screen left, creating a very awkward situation (and not connecting with home viewers). HRC had a less bad version of the same problem.
In contrast, Pense created the correct eye-line for himself (seated screen-right, looking to center, screen-left) and knew when to directly address the home viewer.
Such things are no small deals. They help one connect with a home audience (or not).
These are rookie mistakes that we can't afford. On style, Kaine was beaten soundly by a guy playing the JV version of the amiable dolt. Good thing Pense wasn't willing/able to defend Trump, because if this were a top-of-the-ticket debate it would have been a loss.
As it is, a narrow win for Kaine. But the amateur-hour prep and not having any awareness that the debate would be settled by a home audience is giving ground to the poorly organized campaign but the one whose chief advantage is (supposedly) having its act together.
They need to do better understanding how to work television cameras and managing eye-lines. It matters.
I wished it was Warren, and still do. She'd have eaten Pense.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)We can always be doing better.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)His job wasn't easy or pretty, but he had to prevent Pence from laying out a coherent Trump vision. Do that, he stayed on the attack and challenged Pence repeatedly to defend Trump. Pence did his best to try to make sense of Trump, but never really got the chance thanks to Kaine's constant attacks.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)TonyPDX
(962 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)uponit7771
(90,336 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Vinca
(50,270 posts)After all, Dan Quayle still became Vice President and no one has failed to that magnitude ever.
imanamerican63
(13,787 posts)Vinca
(50,270 posts)imanamerican63
(13,787 posts)livetohike
(22,142 posts)have time for the actual question because he had to respond to the b.s Pence was spewing.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Obvious BS is obvious.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)SamKnause
(13,103 posts)Facts are being ignored.
Lies are being rewarded.
The liar wins.
The truth teller loses.
WTF !!!
Welcome to 1984.
This country's future hangs by a thread, but don't be rude
or interrupt anyone to tell the truth or explain the facts.
That is a crime that will never be forgiven.
+1000
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Rs would easily positively frame TK's performance.
We LOVE a guy who is anxious to battle for his POTUS candidate like that. It shows a genuine sense of respect and belief in SOS Clinton. And, a toughness and aggressiveness we need today. You can tell TK won't back down when faced with contentious foreign leaders!
But, Ds ... Oh, gee, TK was too aggressive ...
Yes, TK was in fact a bit too edgy, but it was not remotely that bad and you gotta fight for your fucking candidates, not bend backwards and allow the Rs, WHO NEVER FUCKING BACK DOWN to get the high ground.
Jesus ...
Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)It's the post debate media spin.
More people see the spin than the debate itself.
Most media types are all over the interruption meme this morning.
I'm just saying the staff didn't help Kaine. Just my opinion.
But, in scheme of things, this is not a huge deal.
I'm MUCH more interested in what happens on Sunday.
I feel good about the town hall format for HRC.
I think she will be much better at that than Trump will be.
Fingers and toes crossed.
Damn, Nov 8th needs to get here soon. My nerves are frayed...lol.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)I think very clearly that part of their math was tweaking Trump and as a bonus sowing some seeds of discontent in the ticket. He has a bit of a slow fuse, but once it gets lit it burns hotter and hotter over time for a good while before it burns out.
They very well might have wanted him to be super aggressive like this to get under Trump's skin and get him riled up all this weak going into the town hall forum.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)His refusal to defend Trump and the weak, "No he didn't" responses did nothing to shore up the ticket.
Pence looked just like one of the early Bond movie henchmen, stoic and grinning before being punched silly by Sean Connery.
Ms. Toad
(34,069 posts)Unfortunately, when I leave my office late at night NPR has rolled over to music - and there are only conservative talk shows to be found.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)On second look, Kaine did very well. They are only complaining about "style" because a look at the facts would be a killer.
Pence not only denied many things that Kaine and Trump had said - so there are a bunch of ads there - but for the MAJORITY of Americans and undecided voters; Pense was a big loser:
The Trump foundation was described as criminal.
Kaine repeated (for those who hadn't heard it) that Trump was insulting.
The Russian connections was super bad.
SS privatization!
Immigration (deport 16 million!?), Stop-and-frisk, taxes...every ISSUE would have put independents running for the hills.
Many of those issues were owned by Pence and not just Trump. Pence said dumb things, like "that was a prepared comment" (of course it was!). Pence made faces and rolled his eyes.
The moderator was awful!! Unorganized questions; bad follow ups.
I think Kaine was prepared on the facts!! Style be damned. Who cares about style?
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)EVERY, I mean E V E R Y Presidential/VP debate has a built in handicap for the D by the media.
That it is being spun as a tie or a slight Pence win with no real impact on the race is indicative of the fact that Kaine won it outright.
blue cat
(2,415 posts)That people who haven't tuned in much wouldn't know all the facts that Kaine was throwing in there. If the public doesn't know facts, it's because the talking heads suck at their jobs.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)He knows the drill...he did fine in my opinion...tired of the negativity.
Bettie
(16,104 posts)It would have been 90 minutes of Pence with no one else allowed to speak.
No matter what he did, there would be criticism. He made the effort to get some time in the Pence Show, but the moderator wasn't willing or able to wrangle them into a coherent format.
Mamajami
(257 posts)But I guess that doesn't apply if they are telling the truth with their bluster?
I think Kaine did exactly what he had to do.
blue cat
(2,415 posts)But pence looked uptight like he was lying nonstop. We can't depend on our media anymore. That's how trump got on top...the media never interrupting him to inject truth.
athena
(4,187 posts)Oh, wait. Likability is only an issue if you're a woman.
BumRushDaShow
(128,954 posts)And then try again.
The DU and media hypocrisy is breathtaking.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)slide without a rebuttal, considering they were just inaccurate. Pence interrupted constantly, as well.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)Kaine saw exactly what Pence was doing and did what he had to do to stop it. Look at how the undecided voters responded, all for Kaine. He did what he had to do, he's a veteran at this stuff.
relayerbob
(6,544 posts)obamanut2012
(26,071 posts)Cakes488
(874 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,978 posts)You are blaming "HRC's Staff"? What the actual fuck..
Expecting Rain
(811 posts)When you are positioned screen-left and you look screen-left (way from the center of the screen) it creates a very weird effect and makes it hard to "connect" with a viewing audience.
So someone goofed up one of the most basic elements of good television.
I've spent a career working in television. This was a fuck up. And an easily avoided one.
ismnotwasm
(41,978 posts)I noticed that--but didn't think of it in those terms. I still wouldn't blame "HRC's staff" for this--as someone has to be on the apparent?--or screen, left. I just glanced over other debates, the positioning seems to vary.
Who, in your opinion makes that decision of positioning?
Expecting Rain
(811 posts)One just needs to be aware that one's eye-line, in that case, is to look slightly to screen-right (towards center).
If you watch a replay (or rely on memory) there were occasions during the debate where Kaine turned to face Pence (visually confronting him). In these moments Kaine had the correct sort of eye-line for the home viewers, and it made a big difference in how he came off. But then he'd drift back to look "off screen."
I'm sure that for many the weird eye-line was something they weren't fully conscious as "wrong," but these sorts of things undermine television appearances. Pense understood the cameras, Kaine did not.
ismnotwasm
(41,978 posts)That makes sense.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)If Kane had waited politely for his turn, Pence would of happily fillibustered the entire 90 minutes. Pence routinely ignored the moderators attempts to call time and the moderator failed to control the event at all.
I'll tell you one thing... if "debates" continue to be as raucous and chaotic as the first two this season, they will cease being important.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I liked the points that Tim Kaine made in rebuttal to TrumPence's attack on women's rights to control their bodies. Pence went way over the line IMHO as to any moderates with that statement. He (like Trump) couldn't help himself and had to pander to the right extremists. But Pence came across as very controlled.
I sadly have to agree with the Pundits that Pence "won" the debate. But I see the strategy in the Clinton/Kaine camp as this morning the fact checking isn't going so well for TrumPence. Give it a week and I don't think any of this is going to make much difference.
Either way - onward to Sunday night.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I did, as well.
Welcome to DU!
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)He took his interrupting cue from Joe Biden in his debate with Paul Ryan. Biden did the same thing Kaine did.
cilla4progress
(24,731 posts)Pence's obvious mimicking of Reagan's facial expressions and movements? He obviously practices in front of a mirror.
Yechhhhh.
Expecting Rain
(811 posts)We kept saying last night that Pence was doing "the amiable dunce."
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... Pence was unflappable (former conservative talk show host). This way the VP debate had a surprise factor. It got talked about. And the media had to highlight the content part of it to "balance" their judgement on the style part of it. In talking about it, if they mention content, they have to talk about Kaine's true references to Trump's idiocies and to Pence's anticipated lies.
Ms. Toad
(34,069 posts)While I was disappointed by Kaine's behavior, that struck me as rude - the conservative radio station I listen to when I head home after NPR flips to music was praising Kaine for his behavior and bemoaning how wimpy their candidate was. In their opinion (caller after caller - as well as the professional guest pundit) they thought Kaine won because - essentially - he acted more like Trump.
So while I don't like winning for that reason, it apparently didn't hurt.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)I don't buy it. That said, I would have counseled kaine to not jump into interrupting the droning Pence right off the bat. Should limit interreptions and if you do interrupt any, not right out of the gate like that. Looks too pugnacious. Pence is playing the "nice guy" image just like ronnie raygun did. Have to be careful with that sly m/o.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I doubt many people "on the fence" will point to this debate as their tipping point.