Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

patsimp

(915 posts)
1. she needs at least 272 on count of the stupid electors in washinton who say they
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 04:05 PM
Nov 2016

won't vote for her - I guess they prefer a traitor sociopath like trump.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
2. I read they can be forced out of their position if the dems really want to
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 04:06 PM
Nov 2016

I'm not overly worried about it

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
3. This is very good and makes sense
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 04:09 PM
Nov 2016

The idea of HRC getting 370 is so not likely. This one makes sense. As long as HRC holds Nevada, NH, Colorado then NC and FlA make no difference.

However, taking NC and FLA would spring Clinton +300 and heading toward landslide.

I do not think she will blow it away, but for the sake of our nation I really hope she blows it out.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
5. Without North Carolina and Florida - this is AWESOME
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 04:17 PM
Nov 2016

I mean I'd like to win those states and every other state out there too. But if any candidate can get to 270 without huge states like Florida and North Carolina then that candidate is unbeatable!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cook Political Report: Cl...