Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama dings Senate on judicial confirmations
Obama dings Senate on judicial confirmations
President Barack Obama on Thursday renewed dozens of nominations for federal judges in the new Congress and scolded the Senate for not confirming them during the previous one.
Today, I am re-nominating thirty-three highly qualified candidates for the federal bench, including many who could have and should have been confirmed before the Senate adjourned, he said in a statement. Several have been awaiting a vote for more than six months, even though they all enjoy bipartisan support.
"I continue to be grateful for their willingness to serve and remain confident that they will apply the law with the utmost impartiality and integrity. I urge the Senate to consider and confirm these nominees without delay, so all Americans can have equal and timely access to justice.
The full list of nominee names here: http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/01/obama-dings-senate-on-judicial-confirmations-153279.html?hp=r4
January 03, 2013
President Obama Re-nominates Thirty-Three to Federal Judgeships
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/03/president-obama-re-nominates-thirty-three-federal-judgeships
President Obama Re-nominates Thirty-Three to Federal Judgeships
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/03/president-obama-re-nominates-thirty-three-federal-judgeships
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1404 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama dings Senate on judicial confirmations (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Jan 2013
OP
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. He needs Reid to accomplish filibuster reform. n/t
Cha
(297,196 posts)2. Thank you, Tx.. Hope they get around to doing their
job soon.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)3. Can these be recess appointments?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)4. It is really not a good idea to recess appoint federal judges, because...
... because recess appointments are not permanent.
Recess appointments would expire at the end of the congressional session - the nominees would have to be confirmed by The Senate in order for them to be permanent.
I doubt you'll find anyone that would give up their current job, at this level, in order to take a position that could turn out to be only temporary.