2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRep. Grayson: Republicans using debt ceiling as ‘legislative terrorism’
He said Republicans saw the debt ceiling as a device to extract concessions they would otherwise never be able to accomplish.
That is why it is legislative terrorism, Grayson continued. They are using the debt ceiling as a means to cut Social Security benefits, cut Medicare benefits, cut unemployment insurance, cut anything of any use to any ordinary human being in this country simply because they want more money for tax cuts for the rich.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1xX3P)
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)They have acted as terrorist for the last 4 years and it is time we call them out on it.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)willhe
(97 posts)I always say dont want smaller government they want no government. The believe in a starve the beast philosophy. The end result of starvation is death.
Lasher
(27,579 posts)The importance of his return is beyond exaggeration.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He does have to be in office to get legislation passed, though, but I am not sure yet if that is his priority.
Kucinich was in office a lot longer and did not get legislation passed either, yet, for some reason, I did not think Kucinich's priority was grandstanding.
What made the difference for me? I have no explanation. Just a gut reaction that I cannot defend at all.
longship
(40,416 posts)I love this guy. He speaks truth to power.
Way to go, Rep. Grayson.
coldbeer
(306 posts)I will be because of the G.O.P. Wall Street will scream.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)".....cut anything of any use to any ordinary human being in this country simply because they want more money for tax cuts for the rich.
It should be completely clear to all Americans by now that Republicans serve only their wealthy masters.
Not the people they were elected to represent.
LEGISLATIVE TERRORISM!
-90% Jimmy
loyalkydem
(1,678 posts)marble falls
(57,080 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)BVictor1
(229 posts)Grayson has always been direct and told it like it is.
That's one reason why righties can't stand him.
It's going to be fun watching him make conservatives squirm as he calls them out from the house floor.
Ian_rd
(2,124 posts)As far as I am aware, they are not actually killing civilians hoping to effect their desired economic policy.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)terrorism--: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
So it was used it correctly
markbark
(1,560 posts)Savaging Medicare/Medicaid and defunding SS would certainly lead to quite a number of premature deaths.
How many people have died because of inadequate/non-existant health care?
Just because they're not pulling a trigger doesn't mean that they're not actively killing certain segments of the population.
mostlyconfused
(211 posts)There is a meaning in those words that goes far beyond a disagreement on political points of view or government policies. To use them in a policy debate instead of (or even in addition to) actually debating policies is a bit small-minded IMO.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)The word was used in the correct context. I provided the definition to the whiner
mostlyconfused
(211 posts)that the word has multiple definitions. Disagree that it is even remotely applicable to any of this conversation. Kinda like a righty calling Obama a communist. Vitriol instead of meaningful conversation.
mostlyconfused
(211 posts)I made it to 100 posts on DU. That must relate some instant credibility around here, right? No? Then I'll just celebrate it myself.
LukeFL
(594 posts)With the likes of boner telling Reid to fu*k off?
Really?
Now you are being naive.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)It would be a shame if he offended the Republicons.