Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts) Mon Jan 14, 2013, 01:23 PM Jan 2013

Are you watching the press conference?

Pres. Obama is consistently slamming the Republicans AND Congress on the budget deadlock.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/live

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Are you watching the press conference? (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jan 2013 OP

But the next question about "socializing" with Congress should nail that down. Walk away Jan 2013 #1

Fucking "liberal" press Cosmocat Jan 2013 #2

i am just saying he has been presidenting while black for 4 years. pansypoo53219 Jan 2013 #3

Walk away

(9,494 posts)

1. But the next question about "socializing" with Congress should nail that down.

Reply to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

Mon Jan 14, 2013, 01:27 PM

Jan 2013

I know he can't say it but "why would anyone want to hag out with Boehner, Cantor and the tea baggers?" but I would.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)

2. Fucking "liberal" press

Reply to Walk away (Reply #1)

Mon Jan 14, 2013, 01:41 PM

Jan 2013

Yes, it is the president's fault republicans act like jackasses because he does not "socialize" with them.

Just mind boggling.

He is ONE fricken man, there are about 300 of these dipshits running around congress balling about how they are so put off they can't come to do their friggen job because he doesn't hang out with them.

Somehow THIS rates as a serious issue for the media?

pansypoo53219

(20,976 posts)

3. i am just saying he has been presidenting while black for 4 years.

Reply to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

Mon Jan 14, 2013, 02:40 PM

Jan 2013

the gnews media needs to point this out.

Reply to this discussion