Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumtrent franks, abortion bans, and the fetal pain lie
Trent Franks, Abortion Bans, and the Fetal Pain Lie
by Jodi Jacobson
Wednesday, an all-male panel of House Judiciary Committee members, led by Rep. Trent Franks (R-GA), passed a 20-week abortion ban. The bill, HR 1797, passed out of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 20 to 12. The vote count fell along party lines, with the exception of Congressman Pedro Pierluisi (D-PR), the only Democrat who voted in favor.Trent Franks' federal 20-week abortion ban is a dangerous piece of legislation, based on false and completely disproven assertions about "evidence" of fetal pain. Yet many media outlets are assisting in the perpetuation of lies.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has promised a floor vote on the bill next week.
This is a dangerous piece of legislation. It is based on false and completely disproven assertions about evidence of fetal pain; it makes legislators, rather than doctors, the arbiters of gestational age; and it would result in the trial and imprisonment of medical professionals who provide safe abortion care. Yet in what can only be called an irresponsible quest for what they call balance, many media outlets are assisting in the perpetuation of lies about a critical aspect of reproductive health care in support of policies that will deeply harm women and criminalize providers.
As currently written, Franks bill would create an absolute ban on abortions in the United States after 20 weeks post-fertilization, for any reason, under any circumstance, except the imminent risk of death of the pregnant person, which as the cases of Beatriz and Savita Halappanavar have shown is not exactly reassuring. Contrary to misreporting by the Washington Post and the Associated Press, it is not a reaction to the trial of Kermit Gosnell, but simply the newest iteration of a bill Franks has been pushing for yearsand he is using the Gosnell case as an excuse to expand the bill from a focus only on the District of Columbia to a nationwide ban.
It is no secret that the GOP is out to ban all abortions in the United States, no matter the costs to womens lives and health, nor the costs to families and society writ large. When they are not acting to ban abortions outright, legislatures controlled by the GOP and Tea Party are passing unnecessary and costly regulations intended to close clinics run by legitimate providers of safe abortion care, and creating hoops through which patients must jump to get safe abortion care intended to raise the costs of early abortion and to humiliate and shame women, plain and simple.
The GOP and anti-choice movements claims about caring for women are belied by the fact that passage of a bill that would create blanket restrictions on safe abortion care, would remove health-care decisions from the hands of doctors and the women who are their patientsand would guarantee that criminal actors such as Kermit Gosnell get plenty of business.
. . .
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/13-8
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1282 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
trent franks, abortion bans, and the fetal pain lie (Original Post)
niyad
Jun 2013
OP
longship
(40,416 posts)1. That guy is as dumb as a post.
Where does the GOP find these nut cases?
I know. The nearest fundamentalist Christian mega church.
The GOP is so transparently obvious. Theres is as much a religious agenda as a political one.
niyad
(113,774 posts)2. the woman-hatred becomes more obvious every single day
Myrina
(12,296 posts)4. "fetal pain" vs. the pain of being unwanted, under-educated, under-fed, and denied healthcare
.... once you ARE born, in most of these cases.
Seems like a nonstarter to me, Mr. TeaBag.
niyad
(113,774 posts)5. you are trying to confuse them with facts and logic.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)8. up to recently they didn't even use anesthesia on infant surgeries....
Still don't on many 'painful' procedures, including birth.
so Mr. political/ fetal development expert....exactly when does a fetus develop neural connections?