Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:32 PM Jun 2013

Ted Cruz measure would overturn SCOTUS on voter registration

The Supreme Court ruled against an Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship prior to voter registration

BY JILLIAN RAYFIELD


Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tweeted that he will be introducing an amendment – attached to the Senate’s immigration bill – that would overturn the Supreme Court’s Monday decision to strike down an Arizona law that requires voters to prove their citizenship before they can register to vote.

Senator Ted Cruz ✔ @SenTedCruz

I'll file amendment to immigration bill that permits states to require ID before registering voters & close this hole in fed statutory law.
2:23 PM - 17 Jun 2013


“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the federal ‘motor voter’ law preempts Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration,” he explained on his Facebook page. “This hole in federal statutory law allows non-citizens to register and thereby encourages voter fraud. I will file a commonsense amendment to the immigration bill that permits states to require I.D. before registering voters.”

The Supreme Court found 7-2 that the law, which the state passed in 2004, is pre-empted by a federal law that provides voters with a form for registration and requires states to “accept and use” the form.

The New York Times explains:

Full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/ted_cruz_measure_would_overturn_scotus_on_voter_registration/
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ted Cruz measure would overturn SCOTUS on voter registration (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2013 OP
And it will still be unconstitutional Just Saying Jun 2013 #1
It won't pass, but if it did it would be constitutional onenote Jun 2013 #12
They should make him pay for court costs. graham4anything Jun 2013 #2
I think when politicians waste people's money glinda Jun 2013 #10
You gotta love the political death wish party BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #3
Handy Randy Paul giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #4
For such a very smart man (I think Harold Feinman told me that?) babylonsister Jun 2013 #5
The media makes much of McCarthy Lite. CBHagman Jun 2013 #7
only one small problem teddy, it won't pass the senate, waste some more time still_one Jun 2013 #6
Yep and even if it did davidpdx Jun 2013 #8
Exactly. Dems may be screwed up, but it it nothing like the repukes, and their anti-women, anti- still_one Jun 2013 #9
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #11
Citizens without Proof (Brennan Center 2006) struggle4progress Jun 2013 #13

onenote

(42,700 posts)
12. It won't pass, but if it did it would be constitutional
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

The SCOTUS decision was based on the court's interpretation of what Congress intended in the Voter Registration Act. It wouldn't be unconstitutional for Congress to change that Act to give more authority to the states.

glinda

(14,807 posts)
10. I think when politicians waste people's money
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 01:42 PM
Jun 2013

on a continuing basis intentionally they should have to pay out of their own pockets. Their own! Not the Koch's or any one else's. Maybe even Bill the Party.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
4. Handy Randy Paul
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:41 PM
Jun 2013

Just drafted one as well. These idiots are more worthless than dog crap stuck to the bottom of my shoe.

babylonsister

(171,064 posts)
5. For such a very smart man (I think Harold Feinman told me that?)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:42 PM
Jun 2013

he's a flaming idiot. When will anyone call him out?

CBHagman

(16,984 posts)
7. The media makes much of McCarthy Lite.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jun 2013

Controversy is their meal ticket.

As for the rest of us, we cannot eat accusations and posturing.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
8. Yep and even if it did
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 05:54 AM
Jun 2013

(which it won't) Obama could take out his nice big veto stamp. It's all theater.

still_one

(92,189 posts)
9. Exactly. Dems may be screwed up, but it it nothing like the repukes, and their anti-women, anti-
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jun 2013

Civil rights is going to bite them in the ass

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
13. Citizens without Proof (Brennan Center 2006)
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 07:44 AM
Jun 2013

As many as 7% of United States citizens – 13 million individuals – do not have ready access to citizenship documents ... Citizens with comparatively low incomes are less likely to possess documentation proving their citizenship ... Documentation proving citizenship often does not reflect the citizen’s current name ... As many as 11 percent of United States citizens – more than 21 million individuals – do not have government-issued photo identification ...

http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/download_file_39242.pdf

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ted Cruz measure would ov...