2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHarry Reid: white & old (age 74); Nancy Pelosi: white & old (age 74). Is it really a mystery that
we're losing the youth vote??
Some people want to play pretend right now.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)because they are not shiny and new. This isn't the MTV movie Awards.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Palin was a shinny object.
Its also the reason Fox news hosts all look pretty much alike.
former9thward
(31,997 posts)In 2012, President Obamas advantage slipped, but under-30 voters still gave him a 23-point edge, 60 percent to 37 percent. No wonder this year the president appeared two days before the election at Temple University, where he exhorted the crowd, So I need all of you to go grab your friends, grab your classmates... I need you to vote.
But it turned out that 2012 was no anomaly. Turnout for young voters this year was around 21 percent, typical for midterms, but the breakdown was disappointing for the left: Exit poll data show that young voters backed House Democrats 54 percent to 43 percent, half the advantage of 2006 and two percentage points lower than in 2010.
The Senate contests were last fought in 2008, a presidential year, and here the plummet was startling. In North Carolina the rate at which young people voted Democratic fell to 54 percent this year from 71 percent in 2008. Virginia saw it slide to 50 percent from 71 percent. In Arkansas and Alaska, a majority of young voters went Republican.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/opinion/are-democrats-losing-the-youth-vote.html?_r=0
Schmice2
(20 posts)Good enough people and have done a service for the party/country, but LONG time to get someone with a LOT more fire in the belly in both chambers ...
CBHagman
(16,984 posts)Politics requires skill and strategy, and experience is useful in honing both of those. In the end you have to have the votes to pass your agenda.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Not sure how these would be assumed to not be part of the equation.
They have done a service, but this party is on life support right now, and with republican's in charge they aren't getting jack all in terms of any "agenda" done.
I don't think people are getting just what kind of trouble this party, and the country, is in right now.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But yes, it's time for new blood.
Rincewind
(1,203 posts)Mitch the turtle, and the orange one are such hip, young studs.
DFW
(54,370 posts)Pelosi and Reid do not represent theirs.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Conservatives hate them both, even more so then we dislike our Reid and Pelosi.
DFW
(54,370 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 8, 2014, 12:43 PM - Edit history (1)
Their base is older white people who are sold on fear and hate as well as the money that finances the media that convinces them to fear and hate. Plus big industry that wants to pollute, free of taxes and liability for the misery they cause. Nothing conservative about any of that. They only hijacked the term.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)woman.
I dont care about a politicians age, race, sex, orientation, or gender. I care about their policies.
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)isn't he the current future of the Party since Warren won't run for President?
Beacool
(30,247 posts)So are many others within the Republican party and they still managed to give Democrats a drubbing. It's not about age, but policies.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And, anyways, you get those jobs by knowing which closets have which skeletons, as well as which pages on your rolodex make money rain down, and those things take time.
davishenderson265
(108 posts)NT
CBHagman
(16,984 posts)Nancy Pelosi was quite an effective House speaker, thank you very much, and youth were fine voting for Joe Biden (at present nearing his 72nd birthday) as part of the winning Democratic ticket in 2008 and 2014.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 13, 2014, 02:36 AM - Edit history (1)
and even on our Democratic political website is beyond appalling. This is a technique Karl Rove has hyped the last 14 years in order to pit the younger people against middle-aged and senior citizens. Just looking at the number of references of old, white folks on this one thread alone is unbelievable.
Definition:
Ageism is a type of discrimination that involves prejudice against people based upon their age. Similar to racism and sexism, ageism involves holding negative stereotypes about people of different ages. The term ageism was first used by gerontologist Robert N. Butler to describe the discrimination of older adults. Today, the tern is often applied to any type of age-based discrimination, whether it involves prejudice against children, teenagers, adults or senior-citizens.
http://psychology.about.com/od/aindex/g/ageism.htm
This is a very dangerous road for people to start down, claiming ageism is not discrimination. If society as a whole buys into that claim, this practice can accelerate to adversely impact other groups of Americans, such as children and teenagers (see the above quote.)
People on this site which are cool with using this term I hope will take a time-out to rethink this practice.
Sam
Response to BP2 (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
Old Nick
(468 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)[img][/img]
blackcrowflies
(207 posts)Let's hope younger voters are not all age bigots either.
I'll put Nancy up against any twenty-five year old Republican in the land.
earthside
(6,960 posts)... it is age as emblematic of an insider leadership that has been in power too long, has old fashioned ideas, and has failed to win.
Indeed, Bernie Sanders is 73, but has bold, progressive and inspiring ideas.
Sadly, the re-selection of Reid and Pelosi as the Democrat's Congressional leaders says more about the tiredness and emptiness of the people that chose them than it does about them specifically.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)is that you should be in a nursing home. I am 75 and no way will I be going to a nursing home.
Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Democrats, don't you?
Ageism is an ugly attitude, and you really shouldn't be putting it out there.
And not for nothing I notice that this is a HIT AND RUN post. Like some of your other gems of late...
on point
(2,506 posts)and perhaps strategy. When Pelosi said she would not impeach Bush, it was time for her to go because she was both bad strategically and bad from a principle point of view. When a president lies the country into war - killing thousands and squandering trillions of dollars, tortures people, rewards his cronies with corrupt money, that is EXACTLY the time impeachment should be on the table.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)They are not on the ballot and complain they aren't on the ballot.
I want the youth vote but it is just like a bunch of kids to deal with.
Make a list of what you want please.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)The "Democratic" policies suck. They are inimical to the interests of the youth. When your choices are far right corporate fascist bullshit and center right corporate fascist bullshit, there doesn't seem to be any real point in voting.
It wouldn't matter if fucking Methuselah was the party leader if the policies were right.
But the policies are NEVER going to be right because this party is just as bought off and sold out as the fucking Republicans.