2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton isn't failing (you're thinking of Bush) and Sanders already provides a viable alternative
(Sanders has principled policy disagreements with Clinton whereas Biden agrees with Clinton on 98% of the key issues and is slightly to Clinton's right on those few issues where they disagree).
In sum, no Democrats need a "viable alternative" to replace the "failing" Clinton campaign; the MSM just needs to generate stories to sell newspapers and to provide hand-wringing topics for the shouting-at-each-other Sunday political talk shows.
Can we move on from the suggestion that some other candidate needs to jump in the race to fill the role that Sanders is already filling with intelligence and grace?
Can we also move on from the right-wing talking point that Clinton's campaign is failing because she used a private email server (just like George W. Bush, Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, and Martin O'Malley)?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'd take HRC in a heartbeat over a long time booster of the drug war and co-sponsor of the RAVE act.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I've been perfectly fine with him as VPOTUS, I appreciated his pushing Obama on marriage equality, on many matters I respect the guy, and I have deep sympathy for his recent heartbreaking loss---
But I can also tell you that the states that have legalized marijuana (and the ones which are likely to, soon) are NOT going to roll over for anyone who wants to start pushing the drug war again.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)quo.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)because the Clinton campaign is failing when we don't need a "viable alternative" (we've got one and he's kicking ass) and the Clinton campaign is not failing (her poll numbers exceed the combined total of Trump plus Bush plus Walker plus Rubio plus Paul plus Christie plus Jindal plus Perry plus Graham).
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I usually ignore the media.
delrem
(9,688 posts)She's fundraising at soirées with the moneyed class, she's holidaying in the Hamptons, and she isn't campaigning.
She tells the country, the world, that "if the (Keystone XL) matter is still undecided by the time she becomes president, she will give an answer then." Like a televangelist, there's nothing there.
Nature abhors a vacuum.
This is causing a lot of establishment pundits to freak out, or pretend to - and invent stories to fill the void while watching their paycheck.
Whatever story the establishment pundits write, they'll take the money and like it.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)rush.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary
Clinton and her campaign can't even deal with this crazy email stuff. What will she do when the real attacks start?
It is better she implodes now instead of a year from now.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)The trend is clear.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)as in Bernie Sanders will never in a million years be elected president of the USA and I'm always right.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Then go pick me some lottery numbers.