Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"In no way does it imply any sort of endorsement of Sec. Clinton’s campaign. "
Martha Laning is the Chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin
http://bloggingblue.com/2015/08/dpw-chair-martha-laning-clarifies-dpws-fundraising-pact-with-hillary-clinton/
DPW Chair Martha Laning clarifies DPWs fundraising pact with Hillary Clinton
In the face of questions about that fundraising pact, Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Martha Laning clarified the fundraising pact in an email to DPW members.
In the face of questions about that fundraising pact, Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Martha Laning clarified the fundraising pact in an email to DPW members.
Some of you expressed concern over a report in todays New York Times that the DPW, along with several other state parties, has entered into a joint fundraising agreement with the Hillary for America campaign.
This is a standard type of fundraising agreement that allows the state party to generate more resources in advance of the general election, money that will be spent electing Democrats up and down the ticket. In no way does it imply any sort of endorsement of Sec. Clintons campaign. Any candidate can pursue an agreement like this. Should any other Democratic candidates for president request that the DPW enter into a joint fundraising agreement we would be happy to do so.
Some typical expenditures for these types of funds are voter registration drives and voter ID education. In 2012 the DPW entered into a joint fundraising agreement with Tammy Baldwins Senate campaign.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1088 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"In no way does it imply any sort of endorsement of Sec. Clinton’s campaign. " (Original Post)
Scuba
Aug 2015
OP
Un-huh. So why not enter into a pact with ALL of the candidates. Why is a pact even needed?
djean111
Aug 2015
#1
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Un-huh. So why not enter into a pact with ALL of the candidates. Why is a pact even needed?
Just, for me, proves that I should only donate money directly to my preferred candidate.
brooklynite
(94,544 posts)3. Do you know if any of the other campaigns asked?
think
(11,641 posts)4. Only Romney in 2012...
think
(11,641 posts)2. Yes. Romney showed in 2012 that it's completely normal to reach joint fundraising agreements
with states parties before they get the nomination...
Some officials at state parties suggested the practice is similar to a fund-raising agreement with the campaign of a sitting senator or an insurgent in a statewide race. Those officials described it as similar to what Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, had with state parties.
But others expressed reservations about the appearance and realities of the practice before there is a nominee.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/25/4-state-parties-sign-victory-fund-pacts-with-clinton-campaign/?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/25/4-state-parties-sign-victory-fund-pacts-with-clinton-campaign/?_r=0
frylock
(34,825 posts)5. The Democrats sure are emulating the Republicans this year..
fund-raising agreements with state parties. Limiting debates and introducing the exclusivity clause. They must think that repubs are chock full of great ideas.