Mitch McConnell blows up at Harry Reid over filibuster rules

[MindMover]

"But McConnell opposes any changes to the filibuster, and he now says if he’s in the majority it’ll be hard to argue to his conference why the GOP shouldn’t change the rules by a simple majority — given Reid’s new position on the matter."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78665.html

Heh Mittch, you are not in the majority and if we have anything to do with it, you and the likes of you, will never be ....

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6585214473/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6585214473/]political-pictures-harry-reid-honesty-politics[/url]

[Lasher]

1. Yertle says the GOP could kill Obamacare if Republicans take over the Senate

Maybe he forgot about the presidential veto.

[LiberalFighter]

2. Yertle or Gerbil?

I think at least he has one stuck up his ass.

[Dawgs]

3. Why would Romney veto killing Obamacare?

[Lasher]

5. Ya got me, I'm taking a lot for granted.

It's still a long time until November.

The Senate is an even closer call.

[Nancy Waterman]

4. If the GOP win the Senate

I guarantee they will end the filibuster. No question about it. The Dems not doing it so the GOP won't in the future is ridiculous. The GOP will definitely do it. I just hope and pray we keep the Senate and the Dems don't talk themselves out of doing what they need to regarding the filibuster.

[Lasher]

6. I think you're right.

But it's hard to understand Reid's logic. Near the end of Obama's first four years, and with the GOP in control of the House, why would he threaten to restrict the filibuster now? Republicans have a good chance of taking control of the Senate in January, making Reid's timing even more questionable.