Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 06:15 AM Jul 2012

Mitt's lead footed, "No Apologies" Euro Tour--could we be missing something?

While we're all having a good giggle over Mitt's apparant tin ear for the niceties of international diplomacy, could it be that he's actually doing some of this deliberately in order to create a greater contrast between him and Obama?

There were plenty of people who loved Bush's in your face swagger and see Obama's quieter rhetoric as somehow apologizing for America even though Obama is in reality far more effective against America's enemies than Bush ever was. There's a longing on the GOP side to assert American dominance and "leadership" and a real disdain for anything remotely European.

Could Romney really be that clueless as to how his remarks are going to be perceived in London or is he playing to the jingoistic tendencies of voters at home?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt's lead footed, "No Apologies" Euro Tour--could we be missing something? (Original Post) bklyncowgirl Jul 2012 OP
Romney doesn't care. He doesn't live like the avebury Jul 2012 #1
There's a difference between swagger and clumsiness alcibiades_mystery Jul 2012 #2
My favorite longship Jul 2012 #3
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
2. There's a difference between swagger and clumsiness
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 07:41 AM
Jul 2012

Even if Romney's various muck-ups were deliberate, they have been clumsy - even to the casual observer. If Romney's still trying to solidify his base with such tactics in late July, the thing is long gone for him anyway. He's long past a pivot point to the center, and these types of Clark Griswoldesque shenanigans definitely do not play to the center.

The bigger point might be this: we perhaps spend too much time looking for secret ways in which Romney's endless stream of screw-ups and campaign no-no's might in fact be a plot. He can't be this bad, can he? Well, yes. Yes, he can. Sometimes, the other guy is just bad. There's no secret intent. Only our own fantasies of Republican superiority would make us think that Romney's incompetence is actually some kind of secret competence.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. My favorite
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 08:26 AM
Jul 2012

"backside of 10 Downing Street"

To understand this fuck up, you have to consider cultural differences.

backside is buttocks in the UK.

10 Downing Street in the press means the PM's press secretary, as in "10 Downing Street says..."

So Romney, unwittingly, was making a comment about the PM's press secretary's buttocks.

Subtle to us Americans, but a delicious faux pas. The Brits are probably still giggling about this one.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mitt's lead footed, "...