Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:05 AM Sep 2015

Bloomberg: Clinton attacking drug prices is "calculated risk"

Bloomberg: Hillary Clinton Fixes Sights on Ripe Target: Prescription Drug Prices

It's a calculated risk by the front-runner, who has steered clear of other corporate targets pursued by rival Bernie Sanders.

Hillary Clinton may have found the perfect target to show that she'll be as tough on corporations as her Democratic presidential rival, Bernie Sanders: Big Pharma.

Targeting rising drug costs has become an important part of Clinton's presidential campaign, even as she continues to defend the Affordable Care Act, offering her a populist issue to keep pace with Sanders's pursuit of the liberal vote.

Going after pharmaceutical companies is a calculated risk by Clinton, who has steered clear of other corporate targets pursued by Sanders, including breaking up the big banks and restoring Glass-Steagall financial regulations on those institutions.


Related:

The Hill: Clinton: Cooperation, not speeches, is needed to regulate Wall Street
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. Yes, "Calculated", not heart-felt.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:20 AM
Sep 2015

And, of course, the looming trade agreements will make corporate drug profits soar. Those "gold standard" trade agreements.
So her new stance on drug prices seems a bit hollow.

Perogie

(687 posts)
6. He has a long record of fighting high drug prices.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 09:03 AM
Sep 2015

That makes your comment invalid.

From 2007
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4513445/sen-bernie-sanders-speaks-prescription-drugs

From 2000
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/04/news/mn-60970

There's a difference between Saying something so you can get elected and getting elected because you say something.

Response to riversedge (Reply #7)

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
10. So in the year 2000 he calculated it for the year 2015?
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 09:57 AM
Sep 2015

If so, the man is a super genius. We need someone with that type of vision in the White House.




Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #10)

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. THIS is what I meant by support for Sanders' positions EMPOWERING CHANGE.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 02:08 PM
Sep 2015

The electorate is all powerful when we choose. When we don't exercise our responsibility, which is usually, others grab the opportunities and power shifts to them.

In this case, as predicted by virtually all experts, support by the ELECTORATE of Bernie's taking on Big Pharm is enabling all Democratic politicians to take stronger positions against special interests. Power of the people at work.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. Calculated? Have they abandoned spontaneity, already?
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:29 AM
Sep 2015

I think it's simpler. She really wants to own the healthcare issue, and near universal outrage made this position pretty safe.


Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. LOL. Of course. Spontaneous campaigning is all the rage right now!
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 02:18 PM
Sep 2015

Agree that taking on drug costs is a natural for someone for whom healthcare has always been an important issue, but I guessed she might wait to take on Big Pharm until after she was elected.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bloomberg: Clinton attack...