Robert Reich: "Why the Washington Post’s Attack on Bernie Sanders is Bunk"
The Washington Post just ran an attack on Bernie Sanders that distorts not only what hes saying and seeking but also the basic choices that lie before the nation.
Fahrenthold trusts the market more than he does the government but he overlooks the fact that government sets the rules by which the market runs (such as whether health insurers should be allowed to consolidate even further, or how much of a charitable tax deduction wealthy donors to private universities should receive, and whether they should get the deduction if they attach partisan conditions to their donations).
The real choice isnt between government and the market. Its between a system responsive to the needs of most Americans, or one more responsive to the demands of the super-rich, big business, and Wall Street whose economic and political power have grown dramatically over the last three decades.
This is why the logic of Sanderss ideas depends on the political changes he seeks. Fahrenthold says a President Sanders couldnt get any of his ideas implemented anyway because Congress would reject them. But
if Bernie Sanders is elected president, American politics will have been altered, reducing the moneyed interests chokehold over the public agenda.
Fahrenthold may not see the populism thats fueling Bernies campaign, but it is gaining strength and conviction. Other politicians, as well as political reporters, ignore this upsurge at their peril.
The Rest:
http://robertreich.org/post/130312224165