2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy it makes sense that Hillary is getting the union endorsements.
Bernie is 100% pro-union, full stop, and when he is president he'll do everything within his power to fight for them and for the working class. Hillary, on the other hand is playing a different game, and the union bosses know that if they don't endorse her, she wouldn't hesitate to exact some sort of retribution on them if she became president. So if you were in the position of endorsing one or the other, would you go with the one who is going to give you support no matter what, or are you going to hedge your bets and go with the one who might cause trouble down the line. Its a pragmatic endorsement, spineless, but not without its sick sort of logic. Just my 2 cents.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)strongly behind one or the other.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)the DNC is afraid of Bernie, hedge fund managers are afraid of Bernie, corporations are afraid of Bernie and unions are afraid of Hillary. Got it!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Many union members turns to their unions to see who the union is endorsing.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Unfortunately that isn't always whats best for union members. It looks like this year they're starting to speak out, since the obvious choice is being overlooked.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)But many times knows lots of information.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)they know it will upset their membership.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)get things done.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But it isn't, so I immediately discounted that theory.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She will side with big business against labor regardless. She isn't even coopting Obama's comfortable shoes whopper. I don't think the union rank and file are paying much attention to the bosses grandstanding.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But shortsightedness seems to afflict most people these days, it isn't surprising.