Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:26 AM Oct 2015

I bet Labor Unions forced Clinton's hand on TPP

The reversal seems baffling, but maybe not when considered under the light of the recent votes like the unanimous decision of the Teamsters to withhold their endorsement.

This is supposed to be an Establishment primary. All the major players were lined up well in advance to back Clinton. Some union leaders have endorsed her at a preposterously early stage.

And yet . . . .

The TPP is vigorously opposed by labor, and Clinton's past support and advancement of it may have been their bridge too far. It may be likely that Clinton's campaign was told the TPP would be too much, that labor union members would not stand for it.

Don't forget, unions not only provide plenty of money to our party, but they also provide the ground troops for campaigns. If Clinton finds herself in a close primary or contested general, a lack of enthusiasm and manpower from Labor could cripple her campaign.

That's the scenario that makes the most sense to me right now for this whiplash.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
3. I thought the unanimous teamster vote was interesting
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:35 AM
Oct 2015

And I couldn't entirely understand what message was being sent by it.

But this makes a lot of sense.

oasis

(49,381 posts)
2. There was much to consider before making her decision. Hillary has
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:35 AM
Oct 2015

said as much. With that in mind, it's quite likely her concern for the overall welfare of union workers had some influence in moving her to oppose the TPP.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
4. But now, not a month ago...
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:44 AM
Oct 2015

Can you see the difference? --that sounds harsh, but I am saying it with a soft voice.

This is the real issue many people who are wary of Hillary have. She wasn't clear before as if to straddle the fence to appeal to many voters. Something was impacting her campaign, it seems, for her to finally set a foot down in one camp. Not both feet, if you read her words carefully, but still enough to give the impression she is fully against it.

This type of behavior is one that we believe we keep seeing from her and that makes us distrustful of what she actually stands for and will do if she does get elected to be president. She is an enigma.

oasis

(49,381 posts)
7. Hillary has always be measured in her speech and her actions. Lincoln didn't
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:58 AM
Oct 2015

sign the Imancipation Proclamation on his first day in office.

It's just her way.

kenn3d

(486 posts)
5. Anybody got links to any rank and file union member forums online?
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:53 AM
Oct 2015

It would be very interesting to visit union member forums to see what if any reactions workers are having to the Democratic campaigns (eg: Union leadership endorsements, differing, delayed, and changing positions on KXL, TPP, etc).
We see many headlines saying what the union leadership decides or pronounces on such questions, but I'd really like to know what union workers are saying to and amongst themselves about all this.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
8. I think it's because of the debate next week. I just hope the Unions
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 12:02 PM
Oct 2015

don't fall for this. She is saying one thing now, said another thing for years prior and should she end up in the WH, will say something else. I'd bet money on it.

She'll get their endorsement to win, then screw them once elected - like someone else we know.

Bernie owns a Lot of comfortable pairs of shoes because he walks the talk. He always has. He's walked many picket lines. Unlike other people we know.

If they trust her on this, it's at their own peril. I hope they don't.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
11. Her famously cagey language
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 12:40 PM
Oct 2015

Yep. It's there. Although it was an interesting political calculation. She's really taking some shots at Obama lately, and the more ardent members of his coalition won't like that one bit.

So she had to have a reason to really hit the President like this, and a good one. Union support is one of the few things I can think of that would draw her out like this.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
12. Even if Union leaders told her flat-out
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:00 PM
Oct 2015

we are not endorsing you unless you come out against the TPP, how could they possibly trust she means what she says? I know I wouldn't and don't! She has spent, literally, years touting the TPP and woke up one day and decided she really doesn't like it? Nope.

I'm not buying what she's selling and I TRULY HOPE Unions don't either because it will be their death knell. Literally.

Ernesto

(5,077 posts)
13. Unions YES!
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:12 PM
Oct 2015

I'm a (retired) UNION Sheet Metal Worker and my wife is a UNION nurse..... You better believe we heard plenty about TPP from our organizations! We even dumped our Dem congressman because his support for the agreement.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I bet Labor Unions forced...