Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:00 PM Oct 2015

Rachael Maddow To Interview Three Democratic Candidates But Prohibited from Doing it at Same Time

WaPo: Free Rachel Maddow (and Clinton, Sanders and O’Malley)

On Friday, Nov. 6, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow will be at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, S.C. So will former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. So will former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley. So will Sen. Bernie Sanders. All of them are seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, and all of them will be interviewed by Maddow on that day.

Just not together. Rules set out by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) allow Maddow to interview these three candidates sequentially — in a format known as a “forum” — but not jointly, as in a “debate.”

Blame “exclusivity” for the formatular madness. Back in May, the DNC announced that there’d be six sanctioned debates spread through the campaign season, starting with the CNN debate next week in Las Vegas and ending in February or March in Wisconsin. The party leveled a threat at candidates who would dare exercise their freedom of assembly and freedom of speech to debate outside of those parameters: “Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process,” noted the DNC. “Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”

We turned to Jaime Harrison, chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party, for some guidance on what things could legally happen in a “forum” versus what things could happen in a “debate.” Here’s what he said: “The candidates can’t engage in the back and forth because it denotes more of a debate than an actual forum. … They cannot engage in asking each other questions or being asked the same question while on stage.” Got that, Maddow, Clinton, O’Malley and Sanders? None of that prohibited stuff!






8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachael Maddow To Interview Three Democratic Candidates But Prohibited from Doing it at Same Time (Original Post) portlander23 Oct 2015 OP
“The candidates can’t engage in the back and forth because it denotes more of a debate elleng Oct 2015 #1
Hell Yeah! Freedom & Democracy at Work...along with "Free Speech for All" KoKo Oct 2015 #5
I say the Republicans and Democrats fredamae Oct 2015 #2
If Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley DID decide to debate in front of Rachael, what would DWS do? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley walk into a bar left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #4
Nice pulling together of Dem Candidates Views on Debates... KoKo Oct 2015 #6
It's hard to believe Clinton is going to let DWS make her look like a coward. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #7
This is whack artislife Oct 2015 #8

elleng

(131,239 posts)
1. “The candidates can’t engage in the back and forth because it denotes more of a debate
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:04 PM
Oct 2015

than an actual forum. … They cannot engage in asking each other questions or being asked the same question while on stage.” Got that, Maddow, Clinton, O’Malley and Sanders? None of that prohibited stuff!

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Hell Yeah! Freedom & Democracy at Work...along with "Free Speech for All"
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:27 PM
Oct 2015

Just NOT if you are a Democratic Presidential Candidate.

Meanwhile the "Clown Car Repugs" march on with Debates making THEM look like they are Upholding the Constitution & Bill of Rights.....and Dems look Like Fools!

DWS....get With It! Time for you to make Changes or Go!

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
2. I say the Republicans and Democrats
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:15 PM
Oct 2015

you know--all of us working stiffs out here that are Sick of having "Democracy" (political factions) running the show and telling Us "this is how it's gonna be--don't like it? Tough Shit-I'm in charge".
Dump Reince Priebus/FOX and Dump DWS and let's have us a good old fashioned Campaign!

















(shhh-don't interrupt me from my daydreaming)

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. If Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley DID decide to debate in front of Rachael, what would DWS do?
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:17 PM
Oct 2015

Try to hold all of the rest of the Dem debates with just Webb and Chafee? Hell, I don't think she'd be able to find a station willing to televise debates with just those two.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
4. Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley walk into a bar
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:20 PM
Oct 2015

Wouldn't that be a great debate?
Just chewin' the fat over a couple beers.
Wonder what DWS would do?

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
7. It's hard to believe Clinton is going to let DWS make her look like a coward.
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 10:45 PM
Oct 2015

But that appears to be the way of it.

I think after the first debate, Sanders and O'Malley should get with newspapers, television stations, colleges, and have a series of debates. Then maybe we can spend some news cycles asking exactly why the DNC demanded contractual exclusivity and reduced the number of debates to 5.

When stupid people assume they're smarter than the people they're trying to control, this is the sort of thing that happens. Well, the blowing-up-in-her face part hasn't happened so much yet, but it will.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rachael Maddow To Intervi...