Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts) Tue Oct 13, 2015, 03:55 PM Oct 2015

Think Trump will somehow try to crash the Dem debate?

He is in Vegas at the Trump whatever the fuck ("the tallest hotel in town&quot (really the third tallest) and now Hillary has kind of given him all the incentive by crashing a Labor rally outside his building last night: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-donald-trump_561c5817e4b050c6c4a29bc2

I am looking for some big time Trump shenanigans.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Think Trump will somehow try to crash the Dem debate? (Original Post) ghostsinthemachine Oct 2015 OP

Supposedly, CNN will be tweeting with him during the debate. Jim__ Oct 2015 #1

Not even Debbie Whats-her-game Scultz is dumb enough demwing Oct 2015 #2

he said he will be offsite tweeting it restorefreedom Oct 2015 #3

Jim__

(14,094 posts)

1. Supposedly, CNN will be tweeting with him during the debate.

Reply to ghostsinthemachine (Original post)

Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:09 PM

Oct 2015

From this thread

demwing

(16,916 posts)

2. Not even Debbie Whats-her-game Scultz is dumb enough

Reply to ghostsinthemachine (Original post)

Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:10 PM

Oct 2015

To let the Repblican front runner in the debate hall.

Is she?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)

3. he said he will be offsite tweeting it

Reply to ghostsinthemachine (Original post)

Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:14 PM

Oct 2015

predictions for how many times he tweets the words stupid, loser, and idiot.

i predict stupid will be used the most.

expect to see socialist, email, and incompetent a lot too.

Reply to this discussion