2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe death penalty is racially biased - So why does Hillary support it?
"I believe it is time for the United States of America to join every other Western, industrialized country on Earth in saying no to the death penalty," Sanders, who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, said from the Senate floor. "We are all shocked and disgusted by the horrific murders that we see in this country, seemingly every week. And that is precisely why we should abolish the death penalty."
He made a similar push during a separate interview with MSNBC Live with Thomas Roberts," adding that "I think many of us understand that a lot of innocent people, often people of color, have been executed who in fact were not guilty of the charges made against them."
Sanders's comments come after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that while the death penalty should be "limited and rare," she didn't support abolishing it.
The Vermont senator has previously spoken out against the practice. He said during a May interview that on the Thom Hartmann radio show, "I'm against capital punishment in general."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/258572-sanders-doubles-down-on-opposition-to-death-penalty
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the answer is blowin in the wind.....
MisterP
(23,730 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)AND our Wars, and then claim to 'care' about racism and women etc, are simply not believable. Just spouting rhetoric they feel they need to spout during campaigns.
marym625
(17,997 posts)No snark. No bullshit. I'm just sickened by the way our country kills people. It is barbaric
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)the only one
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)It's easy to make the death penalty point without dragging race into it.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Sorry you find it objectionable .
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)The death penalty itself is the overriding issue, whether the state has the legal right to kill its own citizens for any reason. I believe that it doesn't. The issue within the main issue is the matter of race. Study after study has shown that the death penalty is disproportionately applied to people of color, people of very little financial means, and in interracial murder, blacks who kill whites.
anyone who supports criminal justice reform and is concerned about the mistreatment of people of color has to take a look at the death penalty issue. And if they want to support it fine, but they should know they're supporting a type of punishment that is not applied fairly or equally among groups of people and decide whether they can live with that.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Include the abolishment of the death penalty. There is no way around that.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Response to Logical (Reply #15)
Renew Deal This message was self-deleted by its author.
jfern
(5,204 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)It makes her look "strong", "decisive", "macho", unlike that wimpy Obama and the other girly men who run in Democratic primaries.
Don't forget "We came, we saw, he died". She loves killing people, maybe as much as her brother in law from another mother, GW bush.
840high
(17,196 posts)people.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Why did Hillary appoint two of their lobbyists as fundraising bundlers?
Maybe because she really doesn't care?
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,361 posts)Thanks for the thread, azmom.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)In 2008, Clinton agreed with a questioner that Americans on both sides of the abortion issue should work together to try to reduce the number of abortions to zero. Clinton reminded her questioner that she thought abortion should be safe, legal and rare, and by rare I mean rare.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Here's his complete voting history on crime legislation. It may provide a more nuanced picture of his positions than focusing on a single vote. As if you cared:
http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/27110/bernie-sanders/20/crime#.VjPOW7erSM8
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I just hate the sainthood image and it annoys me when people pretend things.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)You're talking about the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act?
From http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/02/viral-image/where-do-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-stand-/
So if he had voted against it, people would now be complaining that he voted against an assault weapons ban or against the Violence Against Women Act.
That's the problem with making a "voted for" or "voted against" point without looking at everything the bill entailed. With some of these bills, there's ammunition no matter which way someone voted.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)We have a lot of evidence now that the death penalty has been too frequently applied and very unfortunately, often times in a discriminatory way, she said during a question-and-answer session at a Politics and Eggs luncheon at St. Anselm College on Wednesday. She said she welcomed efforts by many states to revisit their policies.
I do not favor abolishing it, however, because I think there are certain egregious cases that still deserve consideration of the death penalty, but Id like to see those be very limited and rare, she said.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-backs-use-of-death-penalty-1446062646
Clinton, whose position is in direct contrast to other Democratic contenders, said it can't be fully abolished.
I do not favor abolishing it, however, because I do think there are certain egregious cases that still deserve the consideration of the death penalty, but Id like to see those be very limited and rare, as opposed to what weve seen in most states," Clinton said.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-death-penalty-abolish
She acknowledges that there is an unfair racial component that must be fixed. Your OP is misleading
Autumn
(45,079 posts)she has no reason at this time to be against it.
I wish the Democratic Latinos would give her the same treatment the Republican Latinos gave their party
Prism
(5,815 posts)It is also, I suspect, partly her motivation in constantly seeming to want to out-hawk the hawks.