Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 09:52 PM Aug 2012

While fooling around on ancestry.com today I got to doing Rmoney's family tree just for fun.

Aside from the fact that he has a few surnames in common with me (though any common ancestors are obviously over 200 years ago if at all), one thing disturbed me greatly.

Now, I have Mormon ancestors just like him. I know what the LDS church is about, especially their habit of baptizing the dead, and even baptizing Jews who died in the Holocaust. But what I found out about what he and Queen Ann did really bothers me.

Ann Rmoney was raised in a nominally religious home, and her father was actually a vehement atheist until the day he died. Mitt and Ann baptized him into the LDS church after his death. From his Wikipedia page:

"Davies rejected religion and (was) an avowed atheist. He was known to call organized religion "hogwash" and "drudgery". However, 11 months after his death, he was baptized in accord with Mormon tradition. Mormonism being the religion of his children including his daughter Ann Romney and son-in-law, 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Despite Davies being an avowed atheist to his death, Mitt and Ann Romney performed the ritual afterwards.[7]"

The fact that they waited until 11 months after he died is significant: her mother died 9 months after her husband. I suspect it would have horrified her mother for them to do so. They had SO LITTLE RESPECT for her parents that they did this to them, knowing full well how Davies felt. It just chills me.

These people are sociopaths. They are so concerned about their OWN status in the church that they completely disrespect their elders. It's almost as bad to me as the Holocaust victim baptisms.

WEEEEEEEEEE want to have our own planet in the afterlife and reign over our lessers, so WEEEEEEEE will do ANYTHING to ANYBODY in this life to get it.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
While fooling around on ancestry.com today I got to doing Rmoney's family tree just for fun. (Original Post) kestrel91316 Aug 2012 OP
Just because they did these baptisms, doesn't mean they actually took. CaliforniaPeggy Aug 2012 #1
That is beside the point Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #4
Exactly. It is the height of disrespect and hubris. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #7
true, but if memory serves me right they wanted to be together in the afterlife and roguevalley Aug 2012 #15
As for respecting the dead abumbyanyothername Aug 2012 #17
Some do Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #18
Don't have that put on your gravestone davidpdx Aug 2012 #19
Willard -- the great American liar and fraud Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #2
Against the father's wishes Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2012 #3
The trouble isn't vicarious baptism for the dead, it's that some people think it matters. HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #5
I'm a Mormon and know a little about baptisms for the dead... Momgonepostal Aug 2012 #6
I still think it was particularly sneaky and underhanded. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #8
Because you need a body to be baptized Momgonepostal Aug 2012 #10
If baptism is about matters of the mind and choice and belief, why kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #13
Why do catholics, lutherans, baptists etc baptize if it's unnecessary? HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #22
Are you not stepping on others' rights without their permission?? Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #9
I don't see how. Momgonepostal Aug 2012 #11
Gee ....... I guess because it is his life not hers Angry Dragon Aug 2012 #12
It's exceptionally rude when he made it abundantly clear how he felt about kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #14
How's he supposed to gaspee Aug 2012 #21
Strange as it may seem that's only part of it... HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #24
Arguing about posthumous baptisms abumbyanyothername Aug 2012 #16
I think whether you are alive or dead you can't force religion upon people davidpdx Aug 2012 #20
I think it's great we have a Gypsy running for President. kenny blankenship Aug 2012 #23
Only 9 months? Church policy is 1 year FreeState Aug 2012 #25
personally, I really don't care whether anyone chants their mumbo jumbo... mike_c Aug 2012 #26
Is Romney descended from King John? Ebadlun Aug 2012 #27

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,648 posts)
1. Just because they did these baptisms, doesn't mean they actually took.
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 09:57 PM
Aug 2012

I think the posthumous baptisms are essentially worthless.

Just my 2 cents...

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
15. true, but if memory serves me right they wanted to be together in the afterlife and
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:41 AM
Aug 2012

this guarenteed they would be able to see each other. If I can remember it right.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
17. As for respecting the dead
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:53 AM
Aug 2012

I'm with Dave Cross here. When I'm dead, do with me what you will. Fart in my face. Cut of my penis. Poke out my eyeball and stick your penis in the socket.

I won't care because I'm dead.

Sheesh.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. The trouble isn't vicarious baptism for the dead, it's that some people think it matters.
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:01 PM
Aug 2012

That belief held onthis side of death by Mormons and their anti-vicarious baptism is what makes this little tempest in the baptismal font.

Momgonepostal

(2,872 posts)
6. I'm a Mormon and know a little about baptisms for the dead...
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:26 PM
Aug 2012

A couple of random thoughts:

1. You can't have a baptism done for a deceased family member until they have been dead at least one year. It's been like this at least since the mid 1980's.

2. Mormons believe that after death, we still have our free-will. So if Ann's father has been baptized in a proxy ceremony what that does is allows him the accept the ordinance. If he still thinks religion is a bunch of hooey, he won't accept the baptism.

3. My "status" in the church is not based on any work I do or don't do for my elders.

And for the record, I'm a democrat and an Obama supporter. I'll be voting Obama/Biden (again!) in November.


 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
8. I still think it was particularly sneaky and underhanded.
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:44 PM
Aug 2012

If we have free will in the afterlife and god is truly in charge, why can't we just be baptized in the afterlife rather than somebody down here on poor little flawed earth doing it for us???

Seems kind of silly and bass-ackwards.

Momgonepostal

(2,872 posts)
10. Because you need a body to be baptized
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:11 PM
Aug 2012

In the spirit world, you don't have your body.

I don't see how having a baptism done for your own father is sneaky or underhanded. If you know about how, how sneaky could it be?

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
13. If baptism is about matters of the mind and choice and belief, why
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:28 PM
Aug 2012

is a body necessary? If the body is so important, why don't we have one in the "spirit world"?

I guess now you can see why I'm not religious. I ask too many questions and don't simply accept dogma. My family has been like this ever since my g-g-g-grandfather, Bill Hickman, figured out that the Mormons weren't worth murdering for anymore and he ratted out Brigham and the Danites, lol. We went through a few generations of being jacks and then fell away altogether.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
22. Why do catholics, lutherans, baptists etc baptize if it's unnecessary?
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:28 AM
Aug 2012

I think your comments are spot on, but they actually apply to all christian denominations that insist upon this act of obedience from followers.


Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
12. Gee ....... I guess because it is his life not hers
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:21 PM
Aug 2012

I would think if he would have wanted it he would have done it before he died

It is called respect ........... I guess she and her husband have none for others

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
14. It's exceptionally rude when he made it abundantly clear how he felt about
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:29 PM
Aug 2012

all religion when he was alive and breathing and actually existed.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
21. How's he supposed to
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 06:57 AM
Aug 2012

become god of his own planet if he's not baptised? I cannot believe that seemingly sane people, in this day and age believe this shit. And then baptise dead people who didn't agree with their delusions. Talk about disrespecting the dead!

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
24. Strange as it may seem that's only part of it...
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 06:08 PM
Aug 2012

The LDS culture deep family ties...clearly not always met, but that's the model. In their view things like extended family reunions, in this life, are very important to a happy and satisfying life. That is pushed forward into eternity as marriages and children (born before a couple is married in a temple) are sealed to each other for time and eternity...thus it's possible to have truly extended family reunions and the rewards that come with them in a celestial existence.

From a sociological perspective the ancestral proxy baptisms, proxy sealings, create a great sense of importance to family and to family roots. If you know many mormons you will know that they have family problems like all families. But they are under great peer pressure to achieve family cohesion, which is itself a proxy for the cohesion within the wards and branches of the church that both holds the church together and perpetuates it among descendants of living members.

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
16. Arguing about posthumous baptisms
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:51 AM
Aug 2012

is a bit like getting in a fight over who has more powerful superpowers, superman or spiderman.

I mean, if I am going to give the pugs credit for anything I heard tonight it's now their theme that rights come from god AND NATURE.

So apparently we are making progress on the scientific and environmental front.

Small progress, I admit.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
20. I think whether you are alive or dead you can't force religion upon people
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 06:29 AM
Aug 2012

I won't say anything else about religion because that's likely to get me in trouble.

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
23. I think it's great we have a Gypsy running for President.
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:45 AM
Aug 2012

Romany (also known as Gypsies in English, from the Greek gyptoi)-> Romney, the surname of one of the two mountebanks running for the office.
They say, "America's diversity is its strength"; in fact our diversity is so strong and imperturbable, I doubt we'd notice any difference if he won.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
26. personally, I really don't care whether anyone chants their mumbo jumbo...
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:39 PM
Aug 2012

...over anyone-- myself included-- who is dead. Dead is dead. You can't hurt the dead. Disrespect is lost on them utterly. This LDS nonsense is just another bit of superstitious stupidity. Let them "baptize" anyone they like. Hell, they can baptize me while I'm still alive for all I care. Let them waste their breath. Piss on 'em.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»While fooling around on a...