Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have you heard? If Bernie is our candidate, the Republicans will call him a socialist! (Original Post) Scuba Dec 2015 OP
They absolutely will say that.. one_voice Dec 2015 #1
They'd say the same about Hillary. Scuba Dec 2015 #2
Of course. Anyone.. one_voice Dec 2015 #3
They reserved "Muslim Communist" for Obama. Ken Burch Dec 2015 #8
They'd say the same about Reagan jeff47 Dec 2015 #4
What was "socialist" about Reagan? Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #21
Amnesty for undocumented workers, not killing Social Security, several deals with Democrats jeff47 Dec 2015 #50
Reagan wouldn't have been able to kill Social Security even if he had wanted to Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #52
Could have pulled of a "reform" of it....since he did with the Greenspan commission. jeff47 Dec 2015 #53
Opening the door for the Democrats' to call Reps Facists randr Dec 2015 #5
As a socialist myself, I consider that a compliment. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #6
It's one of the nicest things you can call someone. Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #19
They call Clinton a socialist. Nt NCTraveler Dec 2015 #7
For reals? OMG can anyone vote for him now? Vincardog Dec 2015 #9
And you know that NOBODY in the US would EVER vote for a socialist! RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #10
I ask my RW friends, "Which Democrat is NOT a socialist?" immoderate Dec 2015 #11
Did you think your RW friends were going to vote for ANY Dem? MaggieD Dec 2015 #33
My RW friends are idiots. I expect you might have some smarts. immoderate Dec 2015 #49
omg LWolf Dec 2015 #12
There would be one key difference this time around firebrand80 Dec 2015 #13
The problem is Bernie calls himself a socialist. DCBob Dec 2015 #14
What's the problem, exactly? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #27
He admits it. DCBob Dec 2015 #48
It's true. They will. I use it as an opportunity to talk about the role of society in solving LiberalAndProud Dec 2015 #15
The GOP will be screaming bloody murder no matter who we nominate. JoePhilly Dec 2015 #16
The only difference is Hillary has been GOP tested moobu2 Dec 2015 #17
No she hasn't Scootaloo Dec 2015 #32
They'll call anyone a socialist. Big whoop. nc4bo Dec 2015 #18
53% of Americans said Obama was a socialist jfern Dec 2015 #20
well he won't be the nominee MaggieD Dec 2015 #23
The unions probably would prefer him jfern Dec 2015 #28
But they don't MaggieD Dec 2015 #29
Single payer is cheaper, and there are companies that decided to open factories jfern Dec 2015 #46
Except they will have him on video declaring it is true MaggieD Dec 2015 #22
Ha! Excellent post! Nt. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #24
And this time, it will be a sizeable bear trap for them: Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #25
Uh huh MaggieD Dec 2015 #31
Maggie, it's clear you dislike the man. I feel the same about Cinton. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #36
I am not confusing anything MaggieD Dec 2015 #38
His popularity among PoC in South Carolina doubled last month. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #39
Now look at that, as if the anti-socialist marketing was all coming from the same billionaire family grahamhgreen Dec 2015 #26
So you think no pol is too left to get elected in America MaggieD Dec 2015 #34
Not when their policy positions are supported by the majority! grahamhgreen Dec 2015 #41
except they arent MaggieD Dec 2015 #43
You're confusing policies with polls ... Scuba Dec 2015 #47
I'll still call Republicans turd maggots olddots Dec 2015 #30
If they keep harping on "socialism" as an epithet, we should hit them back... cascadiance Dec 2015 #35
That deserves an OP of its own! Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #37
And Wall Street fascists never got arrested for trying to overthrow our government too! cascadiance Dec 2015 #40
It's one of the few decisions that FDR made wrong. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #42
Yeah, because he didn't put Japanese Americans MaggieD Dec 2015 #44
"one of the few" I said. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #45
Whew! What a relief. They've been calling Obama a Communist. merrily Dec 2015 #51

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
1. They absolutely will say that..
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:25 PM
Dec 2015

they're saying it now.

Our message has to be better, stronger, positive. We can't let them demonize what we as Democrats stand for.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
3. Of course. Anyone..
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:38 PM
Dec 2015

that's our nominee. Liberal leftist, socialist, etc.

I thought marxist might have been reserved for President Obama--it went so well with 'Kenyan' but I'm pretty sure they'll throw that one in too.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
8. They reserved "Muslim Communist" for Obama.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 03:08 PM
Dec 2015

Apparently, it didn't occur to them that if you were both, you'd have had to drive YOURSELF out of Afghanistan.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. They'd say the same about Reagan
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:56 PM
Dec 2015

If any of them remembered his actual policies instead of the cartoon they worship.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
21. What was "socialist" about Reagan?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:58 AM
Dec 2015

He's the one who loved to deride fictional "welfare queens" and lowered the top income tax rate from 70% to 28% while increasing both payroll taxes and the lowest tax bracket.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
50. Amnesty for undocumented workers, not killing Social Security, several deals with Democrats
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:37 PM
Dec 2015

that funded Democratic initiatives.

Again, cartoon Reagan is far more conservative than actual Reagan (who was very conservative for his time). Which kinda demonstrates just how far to the right our politics have gone.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
52. Reagan wouldn't have been able to kill Social Security even if he had wanted to
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 04:02 PM
Dec 2015

Back then, there was still a Democratic House that would have prevented shenanigans like that. And in his last two years, the Democrats also controlled the Senate.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
53. Could have pulled of a "reform" of it....since he did with the Greenspan commission.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 04:07 PM
Dec 2015

Throw in a means test and he'd have set up the groundwork to destroy the program.

randr

(12,412 posts)
5. Opening the door for the Democrats' to call Reps Facists
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 03:00 PM
Dec 2015

Bring it on! Do you want to keep your Social programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, Federal highway systems, fire departments, electric utilities, water companies, and the countless other benefits of living in what we call a Society? Or do you want a police state akin to what we all have been taught is the problem with Communist/Fascist states?
The way I see it is that we currently have both and we need to make a clear choice of what we want our future to be.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
33. Did you think your RW friends were going to vote for ANY Dem?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:25 AM
Dec 2015

Your problem is that minorities and independents are not going to vote for a socialist. I've voted straight Dem for 38 years and I sure as hell ain't voting for a socialist.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
49. My RW friends are idiots. I expect you might have some smarts.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:47 AM
Dec 2015

Now is your opportunity to break away.

--imm

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
15. It's true. They will. I use it as an opportunity to talk about the role of society in solving
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 10:13 PM
Dec 2015

problems too large to tackle individually. I discuss how we have been indoctrinated in this country to have an adverse reaction to words like socialist (society) and communist (community). Words which should be associated in our minds with sound values have been poisoned with unreasoning reflex instead. We're overdue to fight back.

moobu2

(4,822 posts)
17. The only difference is Hillary has been GOP tested
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 10:19 PM
Dec 2015

they'll dig up everything Bernie ever said and did and twist it around and hang him with it. Bernie would be lucky to win 5 electoral votes in the general. IF he was the nominee which he won't be.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. No she hasn't
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:24 AM
Dec 2015

She's seen exactly as many presidential elections as Bernie Sanders has, and has been in public service for a much shorter time. Also to her benefit, the biggest "challenges" the Republicans have thrown at her are all made-up bullshit. Anyone can sit through 11 hours of Gowdy Doody making a fucking fool of himself. But when confronted with her Wall Street ties, she turns into a jabbering mess who invokes 9/11 like it's a panacea. When confronted with her lack of a criminal justice platform, she stuck her finger in a black man's face and threatened to only talk to white people. When the issue is her vote for war with Iraq, she gets huffy and claims that she was fooled by Dubya.

When it comes to actual, real issues, Clinton falls apart like a pinata in the rain.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
18. They'll call anyone a socialist. Big whoop.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 10:21 PM
Dec 2015

The Baggers and Bible thumpers will whip themselves into a froth but that goes for any candidate who's not pro-fetus.

Bring it on.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
23. well he won't be the nominee
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:07 AM
Dec 2015

... because rank and file Dem voters don't want a socialist either. Have you pondered why the unions don't want him? Think about that for a minute and see if it comes to you.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
28. The unions probably would prefer him
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:15 AM
Dec 2015

It's just that some unions don't want to end up on the Clinton enemies list.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
29. But they don't
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:19 AM
Dec 2015

You can keep deluding yourself, but they just don't. He wants to tax the shit out of their middle class paychecks and substitute their excellent healthcare benefits for shitty single payer benefits.

Unions don't support Bernie because they will lose out if he were to win. Bernie supporters just kid themselves every day. It amazes me.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
46. Single payer is cheaper, and there are companies that decided to open factories
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 06:49 AM
Dec 2015

in Canada instead of the US because healthcare is too expensive in the US.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
25. And this time, it will be a sizeable bear trap for them:
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:11 AM
Dec 2015

It will give Sanders an opportunity to discuss
a) the difference between socialism and social-democracy
b) the merits of socal-democracy
c) why everyone should vote for him

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
31. Uh huh
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:22 AM
Dec 2015

Because American voters just love to sit in front of their TV and listen to politicians shine them on and lecture them after working all day, making dinner, doing the dishes, homework with the kids and bathtime. SMH. Ain't happening. His supporters have some seriously magical thinking going on.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
36. Maggie, it's clear you dislike the man. I feel the same about Cinton.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:34 AM
Dec 2015

That still leaves the fact that voters will vote for those who address their issues. Addressing issues and lecturing are two different things. Could it be that you confuse the two because you dislike the candidate?

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
38. I am not confusing anything
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:42 AM
Dec 2015

And you hit on exactly why Bernie will lose. He does NOT address the issues of the majority of Dem primary voters. His campaign is exclusively targeting middle class white people. But the reality is you cannot win a Dem primary if your campaign only addresses the issues of middle class white people. End of story. Clinton is winning because she doesn't ignore 60% of the Dem primary voter concerns.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
39. His popularity among PoC in South Carolina doubled last month.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:46 AM
Dec 2015

His popularity among Hispanics in Nevada is rising. Maybe your view of his appeal has been limited by some memes spread by Camp Clinton. Clinton's 60 % is not as solid as it seems. It includes leaners, who could still change their candidate preference. So it's not the end of the story, however much the coronation committee would like it to be.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
26. Now look at that, as if the anti-socialist marketing was all coming from the same billionaire family
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:12 AM
Dec 2015

What a Koch-up!

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
43. except they arent
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 04:47 AM
Dec 2015

He barely breaks 30% of Dems. And they are only 30% of the voters. Since when is 30% of 30% a majority? That's some powerful magical thinking you've got going on there.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
30. I'll still call Republicans turd maggots
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:20 AM
Dec 2015

Puss boils ,pond scum , venerial warts and I better stop now .

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
35. If they keep harping on "socialism" as an epithet, we should hit them back...
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:33 AM
Dec 2015

... and remind them of the cold facts of the COMMIES and FASCISTS their kind has been hanging around with.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
40. And Wall Street fascists never got arrested for trying to overthrow our government too!
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:48 AM
Dec 2015

... which fortunately a hero like Smedley Butler stopped in its tracks, even if those banksters, etc. guilty of treason in wanting to take our government over and align ourselves with Mussolini's fascist government weren't arrested and executed like they should have been for the acts of treason they committed. Republicans never get called out for their crimes, and our Texas polluted school books never teach our children this ugly side of our history!





 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
42. It's one of the few decisions that FDR made wrong.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:54 AM
Dec 2015

Perhaps he was afraid that a round of arrests and prosecutions would trigger a new recession: the GOP has a history of holding a loaded gun to the head of the economy and / or the government whenever they are in the opposition.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
45. "one of the few" I said.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 06:23 AM
Dec 2015

Which is different from "the only one". Could it be that you are overwrought with displeasure, and just pining to find fault with what I say?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Have you heard? If Berni...