HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Hillary Clinton's Ghosts:...

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:13 PM

 

Hillary Clinton's Ghosts: A Legacy of Pushing the Democratic Party to the Right

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/33869-hillary-clinton-s-ghosts-a-legacy-of-pushing-the-democratic-party-to-the-right

which makes most of her supporters supporters of rightwingery-lite, doesn't it?


When Bill Clinton left the White House, Hillary Clinton entered the Senate. She quickly became a major player for the DLC, serving as a prominent member of the New Democratic Caucus in the Senate, speaking at conferences on multiple occasions and serving as chair of a key initiative for the 2006 and 2008 elections.

She was even promoted as the DLC's "New Dem of the Week" on its website. (It would be remiss not to note that Martin O'Malley also served as a "New Dem of the Week," and even co-wrote an op-ed on behalf of the DLC with its then-chair, Harold Ford Jr.)
New Democrats were never really about popular support; they were about bringing together big business and the Democrats.

More importantly, Clinton adopted the DLC strategy in the way she governed. She tried to portray herself as a crusader for family values when she introduced legislation to ban violent video games and flag burning in 2005. She also adopted the DLC's hawkish military stance. The DLC was feverishly in favor of Bush's "war on terror" and his invasion of Iraq. Will Marshall, one of the group's founders, was a signatory of many of the now infamous documents from the Project for the New American Century, which urged the United States to radically increase its use of force in Iraq and beyond.


And if you factor in her rightwing religious buddies http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2007/09/hillarys-prayer-hillary-clintons-religion-and-politics , well, it's kinda like putting the fox in charge of the lefty henhouse, no?

80 replies, 3611 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 80 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hillary Clinton's Ghosts: A Legacy of Pushing the Democratic Party to the Right (Original post)
stupidicus Dec 2015 OP
tularetom Dec 2015 #1
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #2
stupidicus Dec 2015 #5
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #8
Ikonoklast Dec 2015 #30
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #31
Ikonoklast Dec 2015 #32
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #49
ViseGrip Dec 2015 #63
ViseGrip Dec 2015 #64
cui bono Dec 2015 #27
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #29
cui bono Dec 2015 #35
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #50
cui bono Dec 2015 #51
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #52
cui bono Dec 2015 #53
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #54
cui bono Dec 2015 #55
brooklynite Dec 2015 #56
cui bono Dec 2015 #57
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #58
cui bono Dec 2015 #60
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #62
cui bono Dec 2015 #65
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #70
cui bono Dec 2015 #72
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #73
cui bono Dec 2015 #75
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #79
cui bono Dec 2015 #80
Hepburn Dec 2015 #67
Hepburn Dec 2015 #66
lewebley3 Dec 2015 #69
Hepburn Dec 2015 #71
840high Dec 2015 #77
stupidicus Dec 2015 #3
ibegurpard Dec 2015 #4
stupidicus Dec 2015 #6
LongTomH Dec 2015 #7
stupidicus Dec 2015 #10
Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #9
stupidicus Dec 2015 #11
MisterP Dec 2015 #12
MaggieD Dec 2015 #13
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #14
MaggieD Dec 2015 #15
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #16
MaggieD Dec 2015 #17
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #18
MaggieD Dec 2015 #19
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #20
MaggieD Dec 2015 #21
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #22
MaggieD Dec 2015 #23
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #24
MaggieD Dec 2015 #25
Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #26
cui bono Dec 2015 #36
MaggieD Dec 2015 #37
cui bono Dec 2015 #38
MaggieD Dec 2015 #39
cui bono Dec 2015 #40
MaggieD Dec 2015 #42
cui bono Dec 2015 #44
MaggieD Dec 2015 #45
cui bono Dec 2015 #61
stupidicus Dec 2015 #34
raouldukelives Dec 2015 #28
stupidicus Dec 2015 #33
Agony Dec 2015 #48
jalan48 Dec 2015 #41
artislife Dec 2015 #59
AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #43
stupidicus Dec 2015 #47
WillyT Dec 2015 #46
in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #68
ieoeja Dec 2015 #74
Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #76
TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #78

Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:25 PM

1. The facts are there but you have to look for them yourself

The liberal media will never tell you about them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:33 PM

2. Wrong Hillary has been loyal Dem liberal:before there was the word progressive

 



This poster has to use the word Ghost: because they don't
have evidence to support the posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:38 PM

5. so she's actually one of the undead, animated before the word "progressive" was found by Webster?

 

who knew?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:15 PM

8. It still stands that Hillary is a progressive, she has helped lead the Dem party

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 03:38 PM

30. rightward.

Finished that for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #30)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 03:50 PM

31. No, she has lead the party with to largest progressive caucus in House; She is a real leader

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #31)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 04:55 PM

32. Jamie Dimon agrees with you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #32)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 06:13 PM

49. Hillary's progressive credentials are on the Web today: It demonstrates that

 



support have been pushing propaganda that Hillary
is not a progressive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #32)


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #32)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 01:37 PM

64. Jamie Dimon is a great example!!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 03:12 AM

27. Hillary is not a liberal.



.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #27)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:43 PM

29. Hillary very much a liberal, and liberal who just doen't talk; She works

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #29)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:03 PM

35. A lot of people work, doesn't make them liberal. She's not a liberal.

Liberals don't cozy up to Wall Street, favor free trade agreements, only change their minds to somewhat liberal positions because they are forced to by public opinion.

She's centrist. She's a DLCer, a Third Wayer. She is not liberal. If you care so much that someone is liberal then back the person who actually is liberal, Bernie. But don't try to sell me centrist with a liberal label on it. I can see through that.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #35)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 06:20 PM

50. Yes, Sanders didn't work for the party: He didn't get things done: He's a talker

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #50)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 12:12 AM

51. Complete bullshit. And Hillary is not a liberal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #51)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 06:06 PM

52. Hillary has been a liberal, and the Clintons presented liberal buggget

 



when they were in office: So you cannot just right your own
history for the Clintons or Hillary, we all now her and her
work for people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #52)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 06:37 PM

53. Hillary is not a liberal.

No liberal would vote for the IWR - which was a vote for war and a vote to abdicate her constitutional responsibility as a member of congress to hold the power to declare war.

No liberal would be so cozy with Wall Street.

Here, here's a whole list of things no liberal would do that she did:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251887987

Enjoy!

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #53)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 05:49 PM

54. Hillary very much a liberal, most of the Progressive Senators are supporting her

 



Sherri Brown from Ohio just to name one very important progressive

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #54)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 07:52 PM

55. That does not make her a liberal. Hillary is not a liberal.

Thanks for continually kicking the OP that shows she is not a liberal.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #55)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 07:58 PM

56. So I guess someone who SUPPORTS Clinton isn't a liberal either?

Alan Grayson

John Lewis

Sherrod Brown

Howard Dean

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #56)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 08:15 PM

57. Who said that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #55)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:24 PM

58. What makes Hillary a liberal is her work, and her history

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #58)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 08:45 PM

60. No. That is exactly what makes her a centrist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #60)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 01:08 PM

62. Sanders supporters are the only ones telling this falsehood: HIllary is a Dem

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #62)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 07:42 PM

65. Being a Dem has nothing to do with being liberal. Hillary is not a liberal.

Her being a centrist is not a falsehood. She is a moderate Republican at this point, just like Obama.

Why do you want so bad for her to be thought of as a liberal? If you want a real liberal, vote for Bernie. If you want to deceive people by saying she's a liberal when she's not, why?

Thanks for kicking this OP again!

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #65)

Tue Dec 15, 2015, 06:01 PM

70. The Dem party is the liberal party; If Hillary were a GOP person she would right wring

 



Hillary is been working toward a better life for most if not all
American since college.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #70)

Tue Dec 15, 2015, 10:06 PM

72. No, the Dem Party is no longer liberal. Hillary is not a liberal.

If you want a liberal so bad, vote for Bernie. He is the only true liberal running for president.

!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #72)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 02:32 PM

73. According to whom: is the Dem party not liberal: Bernie is a loser like Mondale

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #73)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 08:09 PM

75. According to everyone who pays attention to politics. Both parties have shifted rightward.

Hillary is not a liberal.

Why are you adding insults to Bernie in this exchange that has nothing to do with him? Grow up.

!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #75)

Mon Dec 21, 2015, 05:36 PM

79. Hillary is still working for all the American people: She not like the GOP

 

Last edited Tue Dec 22, 2015, 12:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #79)

Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:21 PM

80. Exactly. "She like the GOP". n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #50)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 08:54 PM

67. Yes, but he IS a true liberal whereas Hillary is not.

Look at her history. She is no liberal and it is an insult to those of us who are to try and shove her down our throats and demand that we accept that she is one of us. She isn't and never has been.

JMHO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 12, 2015, 08:51 PM

66. Hillary is only loyal to Hillary.

And she is NOT under any realistic definition either a liberal and/or progressive. At best, she is a moderate and a hawk. She favors corporations over the middle class. She thought DOMA was OK and favored DADT. She is not even a social liberal.

Sheesh...take a poli sci class and learn the definitions of the different political labels, OK. The evidence is her history...and her past is her past: She ain't no liberal based on the FACTS of her past conduct and statements.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hepburn (Reply #66)

Tue Dec 15, 2015, 05:56 PM

69. Hillary is loyal to the American people and the Dem party

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lewebley3 (Reply #69)

Tue Dec 15, 2015, 06:29 PM

71. When donkeys fly.

She is Hillary, first, last and foremost.

JMHO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hepburn (Reply #66)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 08:58 PM

77. Yep.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:35 PM

3. no doubt

 

that liberal media myth needs to die a protracted and agonizing death.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:36 PM

4. yup. any progressive rhetoric she's engaged in

Is completely undercut by both her past record and her increasingly frequent about-faces on almost every important issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ibegurpard (Reply #4)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:39 PM

6. you know it

 

and as was argued by some of us prior to BHO"s last win -- the time to hold his feet to the fire as he requested is before he is hired, not afterwards when he can more easily ignore it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:41 PM

7. Her current stance on the TPP and other 'Progressive' positions do not bear close examination:

From the Truth-Out article:

Of course, the New Democrats' preference for Clinton shouldn't surprise anyone. She has been an ally for years. And while they have expressed concern over her leftward tilt, they are confident, as the Post reported, that "she'll tack back their way in a general election." For instance, her recent opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership - which Third Way is supporting aggressively - has centrists "disappointed" but not worried.

"Everyone knew where she was on that and where she will be, but given the necessities of the moment and a tough Democratic primary, she felt she needed to go there initially," New Democratic Coalition chairman Rep. Ron Kind (D-Wisconsin) told the Guardian (emphasis added).

If New Democrats aren't worried that Clinton's populist rhetoric is sincere, progressives probably should be worried that it isn't. As DLC founder Al From told the Guardian: "Hillary will bend a little bit but not so much that she can't get herself back on course in the general [election] and when she is governing."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LongTomH (Reply #7)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 06:43 PM

10. so very true

 

unless you have the blinders her campaign has issued...lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 03:36 PM

9. Clinton's worldview is stuck in the 1990-ies. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #9)

Thu Dec 3, 2015, 06:43 PM

11. and the failed experiment it was

 

eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:44 AM

12. her friends in The Family include Gustavo Alvarez Martinez


he's not around no more, his former employees mowed him down in 1989 thinking he'd blab

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:50 AM

13. Do facts even matter to Bernie supporters?

 

She was the 11th most liberal in the senate.

http://americablog.com/2015/04/hillary-clinton-was-the-11th-most-liberal-senator-why-that-does-and-doesnt-matter.html

"But numbers don’t lie and, as phenry at the Daily Kos has noted, Hillary Clinton was, in quantitative terms, quite liberal relative to her Democratic peers during her time as a senator from New York.

As measured by DW-Nominate, a standard metric for measuring partisanship/ideology based on Congressional voting record, Hillary Clinton was the 11th most-liberal member of the Senate in each of her four sessions in Congress. In her last term, that placed her just to the left of Pat Leahy and well to the left of Barack Obama (23rd) and Joe Biden (30th — Biden was the median Democrat in the 110th Congress).

DW-Nominate isn’t a perfect metric, the reasons for which I’ll get to in a moment, but it remains one of the best tools we have available to dispassionately place members of Congress on the ideological spectrum. Rather than relying on subjective evaluations and tea leaf-reading as to her true motives, it takes actual votes cast and compares them to the votes cast by other members of the Senate."

Enough with the lying smears.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:08 AM

14. Why can't they see it? Honestly, I really would like to know.

I know some crapped on her in '08 only to embrace her now but others have seemingly been around for years. You don't wait for years to become a troll or paid shill - so what the hell do you think it is?

I have a few theories but to believe them is to set humans back further than I'd like to imagine.

My leading hypothesis is they are either quite wealthy (yeah I know, 250k is totally middle-class) and fear taxes, basically socially liberal and hard core fiscally conservative or they are some sort of other bastardization of 'Democrat'.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #14)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:10 AM

15. Um, because many people are intelligent and know it's not true

 

See my post above. She was the 11th most liberal senator in the senate. The OP is baloney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #15)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:15 AM

16. From your link -

"Liberals are skeptical of Hillary Clinton. She’s corporate, she’s calculated and she’s the wrong kind of religious. As the primary season rolls on, even if she doesn’t have an opponent, she’ll be pressured to answer a lot of questions from her base about just how far her views have evolved since she last ran for office.

But numbers don’t lie and, as phenry at the Daily Kos has noted, Hillary Clinton was, in quantitative terms, quite liberal relative to her Democratic peers during her time as a senator from New York.

As measured by DW-Nominate, a standard metric for measuring partisanship/ideology based on Congressional voting record, Hillary Clinton was the 11th most-liberal member of the Senate in each of her four sessions in Congress. In her last term, that placed her just to the left of Pat Leahy and well to the left of Barack Obama (23rd) and Joe Biden (30th — Biden was the median Democrat in the 110th Congress)."

bold emphasis mine.

With company like congress and being 11th...... well, that ain't too hot considering MOST of congress is fucking insane.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #16)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:19 AM

17. So you agree the OP is objectively untrue?

 

Numbers don't lie. And neither does her voting record. She is one of the most liberal democrats in recent history. Fact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #17)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:23 AM

18. No, I don't. Perhaps pushing isn't the right word?

Refusing to push back may be more apt.

Banning violent video games and horsehit like the PMRC with Tipper ain't no liberal value and that is some serious low hanging fruit I went for there (because it was mentioned in the OP). So I guess what I am saying is that we haven't seen any real liberal politicians on the national level since I've drawn breath (40 years).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #18)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:26 AM

19. That has nothing to do with Hillary

 

A "real liberal" to this current crowd would be a government filled with socialists. Sadly for you we're a democracy and the people do not want a government full of socialists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #19)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:29 AM

20. Well, you don't have to be socialist to think this is nuts:

"More importantly, Clinton adopted the DLC strategy in the way she governed. She tried to portray herself as a crusader for family values when she introduced legislation to ban violent video games and flag burning in 2005. "

Care to explain?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #20)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:34 AM

21. You want me to explain some idiot at Truthouts opinion?

 

Sorry, there is no explaining the garbage that comes out of their opinion pieces. I will say the site name is ironic since they don't seem to have much of any regard for the truth at all.

As I pointed out in the previous post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #21)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:40 AM

22. Nevermind Truthout - Care to explain?

Proposed legislation:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/hillary-clinton-promotes-law-to-ban-violent-video-games-1.550126

Crazy video raging on games - again because of the OP and our subthread - there are more pressing issues but this is in context:



and this about flag burning -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_Protection_Act_of_2005

"The Flag Protection Act of 2005 was a proposed United States federal law introduced by Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Robert Bennett. The law would have outlawed flag burning, and called for a punishment of one year in jail and a fine of $100,000. "

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #22)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:43 AM

23. Who cares?

 

Seriously, this is an important issue to you but Bernie's gun votes aren't? No one gives a shit what she said about video games a decade ago. Really. Trust me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #23)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:45 AM

24. And there ya have it - I tried.

Don't start arguing a sub point only to end up going 'Who Cares?'

Well, do what you want, shame we couldn't have a dialog.

Be well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #24)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:47 AM

25. I'm sorry - I just can't take that seriously

 

She's a DLC third way right winger because of something she said about video games a decade ago?

But the fact that she had the 11th most liberal voting record in the senate is irrelevant to you?

I can't even believe some of the stuff I see posted here. Smh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #25)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:52 AM

26. Alrighty, the ol' college try -

11th most liberal "VOTING" record in the senate is a lot like saying 11th most popular bologna brand among vegans.

That make sense?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #15)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:07 PM

36. On a spectrum that doesn't include many liberals so it is skewed.

11th most liberal does not a liberal make when the senate is filled with extreme right wingers and centrists and about two-4 actual liberals. That stat means nothing as far as her actually being a liberal -which she isn't, she's centrist - as has been pointed out countless times on here.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #36)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:31 PM

37. This is the senate - the "spectrum" is as wide as it is country-wide

 

Seems to me Bernie supporters just refuse to accept that not everyone within the Democratic party throughout the country is as far left as the socialist wing. That's why there is only ONE socialist senator in congress.

You can keep tilting at windmills but you're not going to turn even the blue states Dems into a party of socialists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #37)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:39 PM

38. You didn't address what I said at all.

A spectrum is a spectrum. She's not liberal just because she's the "11th most liberal" out a a group that includes a lot of tea baggers and extreme right wingers.

You can have 100 marbles. 4 of them could be blue and then the rest of them could be red with about 20 of them having a varying degrees of a purplish hue. Being the 11th most blue out of that group does not make that marble blue. It's still purple.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #38)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:40 PM

39. It included over 55 Dems.

 

So there goes your argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #39)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:43 PM

40. How so? It's still a spectrum.

You really just don't want to face facts.

Go ahead and make 51 of the other marbles varying degrees of purple. Being 11th most blue still does not make that purple marble blue.

Seriously, this is very basic stuff, I'm sure you can understand it.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #40)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:21 AM

42. Pretty Simple - 89% of the Senate was LESS liberal than Hillary

 

And you are accusing her of being republican lite. It's absurd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #42)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:05 AM

44. Where do you think she stands compared to Obama? Would you agree very similar?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cui bono (Reply #44)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 02:51 AM

45. He was rated 23rd most liberal

 

But he wasn't there very long.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MaggieD (Reply #45)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 08:47 PM

61. Well that proves how wrong those ratings are.

Clinton and Obama are extremely close in policy except Obama might be more liberal than Clinton. And Obama is a moderate Republican. So, no, Hillary is not a liberal.

If you Hillary supporters want a liberal so badly just vote for Sanders. Then you won't have to twist yourself into pretzels trying to convince yourselves Hillary is a liberal.

.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #14)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:48 PM

34. I'd guess the reasons are many and vary

 

depending on the individual. I think most of it is attributable to and incomplete/distorted pov regarding her husbands admin as well as her own as a proud 3rdwayer.

Those that match your description of the troll should just have their old posts shoved up their internet ____, and that's about it. Why anyone would take them seriously likely closely matchy some of the stupid reasons those not of the 1% would vote like one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:32 AM

28. Trump is the natural extension of having no real left in this country.

Our ever rightward shift is now allowing full blown fascism to take root in our corporate conservative wonderland.

Just as shareholders have helped shape democracies around the world for a century, they are now using all they own to shape our own.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to raouldukelives (Reply #28)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:14 PM

33. good points

 

I think that there's a "left" left though, and that's what Bernie's campaign is really all about -- waking that sleeping giant

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to raouldukelives (Reply #28)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:55 AM

48. _that_ truth hurts - be thankful that some small ($) force is pulling back… it's all we got for now.

cheers anyway, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:45 PM

41. Ban flag burning? That's right out of the Richard Nixon play book.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jalan48 (Reply #41)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 01:52 PM

59. Yup

 

If you just read what she has said at times and some of her actions. .you wouldn't think she is a Democrat. Or at Lleast what most of us think as a Democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:28 AM

43. When they say 'pragmatism' they are talking about capitulation'

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #43)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:39 AM

47. that would be a safe bet, or better descriptor

 

for sure

I always thought Bush did a good job of hiding his criminality behind the facade of incompetence too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 02:56 AM

46. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2015, 02:33 PM

68. kick! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 04:20 PM

74. "adopted the DLC strategy"? She was DLC President! In that row she likely recruited neo-con Dems.nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 08:15 PM

76. There are votes which line up with the RW such as gun issues and this is

A concern. It is hard to be left when one votes right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stupidicus (Original post)

Thu Dec 17, 2015, 09:11 PM

78. K & R !

A center-right democrat through and through.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread