Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,054 posts)
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 05:34 PM Sep 2012

Brad DeLong (econ professor): Romney/Ryan worst candidates since Nixon/Agnew

About the author: J. Bradford DeLong is an economics professor and chair of the political economy major at UC Berkeley and writes the blog "Grasping Reality with Both Invisible Hands: Fair, Balanced, and Reality-Based: A Semi-Daily Journal" (http://delong.typepad.com).

Worst Republican Candidates in 40 Years!

It's official: Ryan-Romney are worse than McCain-Palin.

Now I am not saying McCain-Palin were worse than Bush-Cheney. But they certainly were no better. And Bush-Cheney were certainly worse than Dole-Kemp, who were certainly worse than Bush-Quayle.

Whether Bush-Quayle were worse than Reagan-Bush is not clear. Quayle knew more policy substance than Reagan--but was not as good at hitting his marks and remembering his lines. But Reagan-Bush were certainly worse than Ford-Dole.

Which gets us back to Nixon-Agnew as the last time the Republicans offered us candidates less qualified to be president and vice president than these...

That is sobering.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brad DeLong (econ professor): Romney/Ryan worst candidates since Nixon/Agnew (Original Post) alp227 Sep 2012 OP
Yes, but Nixon/Agnew won. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2012 #1
Twice. The second time, in a landslide. regnaD kciN Sep 2012 #2
WORSE than Nixon. Nixon at least gave us the EPA, Title X (IIRC) and some other kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #3

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,856 posts)
1. Yes, but Nixon/Agnew won.
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 05:47 PM
Sep 2012

And I would argue that Nixon was actually more qualified than Romney (though probably about as evil). Nixon had been in the Navy and served as both a congressman and a senator, and was Eisenhower's vice president. He was a nasty piece of work, but you can't argue with his professional credentials. And Agnew, who had been the governor of Maryland, was probably no less qualified (professionally) than Ryan, and he had the reputation of being a moderate. However, it turned out he was a crook; he had accepted a lot of money in bribes when he was governor and was forced to resign as VP.

I think Romney and Ryan are worse than those two, if that could be possible.

I don't think anyone will ever be worse than Dick Cheney. He's a black hole of bad.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
3. WORSE than Nixon. Nixon at least gave us the EPA, Title X (IIRC) and some other
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 06:49 PM
Sep 2012

very progressive things.

This latest crop of repukes, from Dubya to now, is FAR FAR worse.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brad DeLong (econ profess...