Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:44 PM Jan 2012

Krugman: "Trickle-down economics has now become shut-your-trap economics."

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/be-vewy-vewy-quiet/

Be Vewy, Vewy Quiet


Andy Rosenthal gets a bit of a laugh out of Mitt Romney’s insistence that the only reason anyone would talk about inequality is the “politics of envy”, and that if the subject is discussed at all, it should only be in “quiet rooms”.

Indeed. Because there’s no way anyone who isn’t motivated by envy could be interested in and possibly concerned about this:



Trickle-down economics has now become shut-your-trap economics.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: "Trickle-down economics has now become shut-your-trap economics." (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2012 OP
What is the vertical axis? Percent? Dollars? jimlup Jan 2012 #1
Hi. I found this under comments @ Krugman's link; I imagine there's more... babylonsister Jan 2012 #2
Thanks! jimlup Jan 2012 #5
Is that chart adjusted for inflation ? FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #3
Yes, "real" means inflation-adjusted. Jim Lane Jan 2012 #8
....and approximately 50 % of the 99 percent will vote for the One percent. BlueJazz Jan 2012 #4
Scary isn't it... jimlup Jan 2012 #6
it's be great if this became a slogan for the Democratic party renate Jan 2012 #7
Why does Paul hate America. /sarcasm BootinUp Jan 2012 #9

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
1. What is the vertical axis? Percent? Dollars?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:52 PM
Jan 2012

I'd like to use this graph on a mainstream site where I often debate economic policy but I know I'll be attacked and I'd like to know more about the source and nature of the graph.

Thanks!

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
2. Hi. I found this under comments @ Krugman's link; I imagine there's more...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jan 2012

The figure comes from a Congressional Budget Office report entitled
"Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007", Pub. No. 4031, October 2011. The label on the vertical axis is Percent

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. Yes, "real" means inflation-adjusted.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 01:11 AM
Jan 2012

If it says "nominal" that means current dollars (i.e., no inflation adjustment) as opposed to constant dollars (i.e., inflation adjusted).

If it doesn't say anything it's safer to assume that it's not adjusted.

renate

(13,776 posts)
7. it's be great if this became a slogan for the Democratic party
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 08:46 PM
Jan 2012

Although they're funded by the one percent too, darn it....

I do think that what you said could be used as a really nice slogan by somebody like Alan Grayson or Elizabeth Warren.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Krugman: "Trickle-d...