2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumImportant Editorial: Hillary Clinton Should Withdraw Now!
by
H. A. Looserman
By now, it must be obvious to Democratic Candidate Hillary Clinton that she has no chance of becoming the Democratic nominee for President. Based on selected online polls, she is clearly not the choice of The American People. Bernie Sanders is obviously the presumptive candidate at this point, a month before the Iowa primary caucuses and other February primary elections.
Corporate polling, of course, paints a different picture, but real voters know better. Ask yourself this: "Have I ever been polled by a phony corporate polling company?" The answer is clearly no. You've voted multiple times in online polls, though, conducted after a debate. You know the truth. I know the truth. I am a political pundit who has published articles in prominent places, such as Huffington Post, after all.
Given the obvious facts, it is time, I believe, for Hillary Clinton to withdraw from this campaign. By continuing, she is only perpetuating the false hopes of the majority of Democratic voters. Why would she do that? And Bill Clinton. That should not be forgotten, either. He's no better than a philandering sex addict, after all. Why would anyone vote for a wife who stuck with him after his serial misdeeds?
By withdrawing now, Ms. Clinton will escape the criticism she is sure to face from Republicans and the humiliation of having no delegates supporting her at the Democratic Nominating Convention. Why would she put herself through all that after all? If she pulls out now, she'll skip all the mess and confusion and let the choice of The American People, Bernie Sanders, run in November. He'll be the nominee anyhow, so why not cut her losses now? I mean, really...
As the most knowledgeable political pundit writing today on a variety of important Internet websites, I'm just giving her the advice her campaign team should be giving her. Withdraw now, Hillary! Save yourself the embarrassment of a certain defeat at the convention. Listen to The American People, for goodman's sake and do what you know you need to do.
http://www.newsyoushouldntbelieve.com
Note: Permission granted by NYSB to post complete article.
jkbRN
(850 posts)It's really quite sad.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Columnist published in The Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Baltimore Sun, The Hill, Salon, The Jerusalem Post
In 2016, Bernie Sanders Will Defeat Clinton and Dominate Trump to Become President
Posted: 01/01/2016 10:56 am
On November 8, 2016 Bernie Sanders will achieve a dominant victory over Donald Trump. Already, Sanders defeats Trump in the polls by a wider margin than Hillary Clinton, as illustrated in a December 22, 2015 Hill article titled "In blockbuster poll, Sanders destroys Trump by 13 points":
Stop the presses! According to a new poll by Quinnipiac University on Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) destroys Republican candidate Donald Trump in a general election by 13 percentage points. In this new poll, Sanders has 51 percent to Trump's 38 percent.
If this margin held in a general election, Democrats would almost certainly regain control of the United States Senate and very possibly the House of Representatives.
It is noteworthy that in this Quinnipiac poll, Sanders runs so much stronger than Clinton against Trump...
In the December 22 poll, Bernie Sanders defeats Trump by 13 points, while Clinton beats Trump by 7 points.
There are numerous reasons Bernie Sanders will achieve this dominant victory over a billionaire xenophobe who panders to the fears and base passions of conservatives. First, Bernie Sanders warns against the influence of money and power in politics, and "welcomes the hatred" of the billionaire class that Trump personifies. Sanders won the Congressional Award from the Veterans of Foreign Wars, while Trump insulted Vietnam Veteran and former POW John McCain. There are a great many other reasons that I'll highlight in the future, when Sanders becomes the Democratic nominee. Overall, Bernie Sanders genuinely cares about ending wealth inequality and perpetual wars, while Trump is a buffoon who's spent most of his time making headlines for outrageous statements.
Most importantly, Sanders is the antithesis of Trump and gives voters a stark contrast in choice; not so with Hillary. POLITICO writes that Clinton "received donations from both him and son Donald Trump Jr. on separate occasions in 2002, 2005, 2006 and 2007, according to state and federal disclosure records." You'll never get a Clinton supporter to address these donations, or why Trump once felt it would be advantageous to become one of Clinton's donors.
Trump also gave $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, in either a moment of pure altruism, or another campaign donation akin to Clinton's foreign donor scandal.
While the recent Quinnipiac poll shows Clinton defeating Trump, the underlying data shows that generally, Americans don't trust the former Secretary of State. 59 percent of American voters believe Clinton is "not honest and trustworthy...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/in-2016-bernie-sanders-defeat-clinton-trump_b_8902400.html
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)MM sure does spend a lot of time doing that doesn't he?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)riversedge
(70,214 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)We had our very own Feynman, too, until s/he got PPR'd.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But I would be a liar if I didn't say I am not above wanting to hear the latest bit of gossip. Who got PPR'd.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Pretty sexist of you, IMO.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:45 PM - Edit history (2)
I merely asked who was PPR'd and referred to a gender. Why would you infer/imply I believe PPRing has a gender bias?
P.S. I actually like you. You seem to have more of a sense of humor than many of your associates. I hope the feeling is mutual. I referred to you as sir, not the PPRD victim:
bvf
(6,604 posts)I'll forgo the cheap shot as obvious bait for the nonce.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But I would be a liar if I didn't say I am not above wanting to hear the latest bit of gossip. Who got PPR'd.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251965172#post39
his=Feynman
bvf
(6,604 posts)Get in line for your medal.
It's big, shiny, and made of aluminum. You'll love it!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)I'm still waiting for our interlocutor to finish his Google search for "Phyllis Diller" before he gives his OK on my new sig line.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance.
bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am more partial to sophomoric humor.
bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am more of a Howard Stern aficionado. My tastes tend toward the plebeian. I rather go to a NBA game than an opera.
bvf
(6,604 posts)And who is Benny Hill? Please elucidate.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Some British comedian that other people thought was funny...
My favorite moment in college was when this gentleman in my Humanities class loudly proclaimed "I don't like the arts" and walked out of the classroom, never to return. I thought his assessment was off, but interesting nonetheless.
That being said I would prefer a Monet to a Velvet Elvis.
bvf
(6,604 posts)How about that.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)"tête-à-tête," but don't let that put you off of your laughable pretentiousness
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That seems like a bit of arrant pedantry but in any case my $299.00 Lenovo doesn't have accent marks*. Being a plebeian has its drawbacks.
As an aside I have lavished you with praise. Your attacks won't dissuade me from the path I have chosen.
*Actually, I am not sure about that. It does have accent marks but it won't allow me to go back and put them over a letter. If you want to buy me a better computer I am not too proud to decline your offer.
bvf
(6,604 posts)your computer has accent marks?
That's a new one, for sure.
ETA:
/ETA
Complete nonsense aside, do a quick search on "assistive technology." You might be amazed.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If I type in a letter and try to go back to place an accent mark over the letter the letter gets erased.
In the future instead of writing tete- a- tete I will just copy and paste tête-à-tête.
As an aside here is tête-à-tête written without accent marks:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/jykw6f8
Would you agree we seem to be mired in the picayune?
P.S.
Tete-a-tete (pronounced tet-uh-tet) comes from the French tête-à-tête, which translates literally to head to head. In English, we use it mainly as (1) a noun meaning a private conversation between two people, (2) an adjective meaning involving two people conversing in private, and (3) an adverb meaning done in private between two people.
These are its conventional meanings, anyway. The phrase is also sometimes used to mean a match or competition between two people, and its sometimes used to refer to meetings or conversations that are not necessarily private or limited to two people.
We usually italicize loanwords and loan phrases that are new to English, but tete-a-tete has been in English for at least three centuries, so it usually goes unitalicized in normal use.
The phrase sometimes appears in English texts with the French accent marks. English speakers are not kind to these marks, though, and the anglicized, unaccented form is much more common.
http://grammarist.com/usage/tete-a-tete/
bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)worrying about who likes me. YMMV.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He must have watched the Charlie Brown Christmas show or something.
bvf
(6,604 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)He died in 1988. Who was imitating him here?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Theoretical physics is one of my favorite things, though.
I studied his work way back when...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)DU's Feynman. Not much talk about theoretical physics here, as far as I've seen. Maybe the poster was talking about someone else and misspelled the name. I don't know. Truly, there's not a lot of reason for most people to have heard of him, despite his 1965 Nobel Prize. I can't imagine why he would come up on DU at all, really.
Maybe the poster will expand on this a little.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Maybe his lightheartedness will rub off on them. One can hope.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I guess I missed that poster, whoever it was. Why would talking about subatomic physics get someone PPRed?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)That reminds me of the post you made comparing bravenak, being put on time out, to Jesus being crucified.
Mencken? Mencken?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance.
bvf
(6,604 posts)What does that even mean?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I think you have become my greatest fan. I am actually flattered.
In fact given our fondness for one another we need to be on a first name basis. My name is Brian.
If you want I would be happy to send you an autographed photo for your birthday.
bvf
(6,604 posts)one of the creepiest responses I've ever seen directed my way, and I won't even detail the crap I've seen on usenet.
I'll spare you the alert.
Number23
(24,544 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)but I must have missed this!
Really?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)On a cross, I am not shitting you.
Some posts are windows into a person's mind and that was one of them for me.
Gothmog
(145,195 posts)http://www.theonion.com/article/bernie-sanders-refuses-flashy-abc-podium-favor-own-51845
NYSB is, to put it kindly, the aluminum standard.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)It's far more useful than gold, really, and has far more uses than gold, too. I certainly own more things made of aluminum than of gold. I'll bet you do, too.
Like gold, it has also been used in jewelry, particularly in years past when it was very costly to produce. Even today, though, jewelry is made of lowly aluminum.
bvf
(6,604 posts)as are most attempts at humor that absolutely clutter the internet.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)One needn't pay for it, and I have an endless supply ready at hand.
bvf
(6,604 posts)But I have been in the market for a new signature line.
You mind?
ETA:
"Yes" or "no"? This isn't theoretical physics, y'know.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I got some groceries-Some peanut butter-to last a couple of days...
bvf
(6,604 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Congratulations on your recent discovery of serendipitous vowel substitution, btw. Very good, if you're eight years old.
Yes or no?
Gothmog
(145,195 posts)HA Goodman is a joke and so it is appropriate to laugh at his attempts at political analysis
bvf
(6,604 posts)If you don't know that, then you don't understand the concept.
The challenge is in the execution. Seeing that is apparently beyond your grasp.
Gothmog
(145,195 posts)It is really sad when Sanders supporters post Goodman's sad attempts at analysis and then are offended when people laugh at Goodman
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Can't wait to learn how to fish!
I bet there's some experienced DUers who can give me terrific pointers especially on the topic of hooks and proper baits.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Ask me anything, and I'll try to help. But, this is probably not the thread for that. You could send me DUMail with your questions.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)I know how to crab but not fish.
Would also love to get out into a little salt not just the lakes.
He didn't get me any gear other thsn the rod so lots of prep to do.
So not just pure snark.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)There are tons of websites on fishing of all types, and you'll find all the information you need on Google, wherever you live and whatever fish you're looking to catch.
Any day spent fishing is far better than any day spent working. That much is certain.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)But you knew that. In any event, you seem to be working remarkably hard to discredit someone most people don't give a crap about anyhow.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I hope nobody's taking him seriously. Really. Still, his writings sure seem to show up on DU a lot, don't they?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)There are a fair number of asshats on both "sides." I do not allow their asshattery to influence me one way or the other.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)There is a post a day from Goodman, here on DU ... mostly posted (or re-posted) by Bernie supporters.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)I don't take Goodman very seriously - like I said, he's pretty much an outlier. But people (including Goodman) are entitled to their opinions, which one can take or leave. I also suspect some people are reccing or citing Goodman on the basis of the articles' headlines and haven't actually read the entire articles. I support Bernie because of what he is doing and saying, not because of the opinions or commentary of anybody else - including the denizens of DU, pro or con.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... how does one account for those? What are we to make of that?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)guaranteed approximately 200 recs. I'm not sure what that means for the primary voting, though. Not much, I imagine.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Is it work the risk?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)health condition against her. That wouldn't be right.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)what can you make fun of?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Being a messenger is a dangerous job, you know.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)"2016 General Election To Be Conducted On Social Media"
It's called "News You Shouldn't Believe" and is apparently one person's idea of humor.
Is there a reason to use sarcastic blog posts just to stir shit here?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance.
The only difference between Mr. Goodman and Mr Looserman, imho, is the former doesn't realize his writing is satirical while the latter does.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)it regularly for new posts. When a new one appears, I often post it here, too.
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)but thanks for the post it's good for a laugh
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Or so I believe, anyhow.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)created for the betterment of the common good and all their actions are to produce a great society to take care of us all and make everyone rich, not just their stockholders at any expense to anything or anybody.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I do know that most people I know work for a corporation, though, and depend on their regular paychecks. Is that what you mean?
At least Third Way Manny's satire was funny. This, not so much.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)but I noticed you post a lot of links from this "obscure" blog, perhaps a bit of self promotion?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Very perceptive of you, I'm sure. Any promotion is welcome, of course. I'm tired of being my own boss. I could use a promotion.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)clickety click
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)It has no ads and so generates zero income. Clickbait sites earn money from visits when visitors click other links.
Confidentially, the only visits to that website come from DU and do nothing for its owner. It exists only as a holding place for writers of satirical material. I thought that was obvious. Clicks, in themselves, have zero value to anyone.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)writers like yourself to share snark without being called out for what you write. I understand now. Thank you.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Oh, well...
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)but I understand how one could protect themselves from slander accusations and perhaps lawsuits.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Poking at public figures is fair game, really. Everyone seems to do it. Satire is protected expression, generally.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)at the blog should have no fear to present their material under their own names. Unless they do not want what they write there to be associated with their "brand"
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I sort of doubt it, actually. There are many reasons to write pseudonymously, it seems. Most DUers use a pseudonym. I don't think they "fear to present their material under their own names," though. Do you?
Irony is a funny thing, isn't it?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)I were a writer and proud of the work I have done I would gladly have my name associated with what I have produced. Of course if I felt the work is below standard or I could face repercussions then I can see why one would use such a blog. BTW some writers like Pitt used their real names even here on DU.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)TekGryphon
(430 posts)How much has the Bernie Campaign raised for the progressive movement, beyond himself?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)the DNC might raise some money for those down-ticket candidates, but I haven't seen any numbers. I'm not interested enough to go look, really.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)riversedge
(70,214 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)I thank you!
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I've been enjoying the responses.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)This does nothing to dispel that generalization.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)And only reposted for the same
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)** insert George Santayana quote here**
bvf
(6,604 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Not everyone finds the same things to be funny, I guess. Further, satire is not necessarily humorous in nature. In fact, it's often not funny at all.
Thanks for taking the time to reply to the thread.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I couldn't say much about conservatives with any real confidence.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I've certainly had to grow a thicker skin here. That's for sure.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Well, I never take offense, unless it's just lying around. I'm done with this subthread, though. The floor is yours.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)After all you are the one who is the former freeper who came here right?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)as a staunch conservative whose party (The Republicans) have simply gone so far over the edge you cant even identify with them.
So you came here because 3rd way has managed to subvert our party into basically 80s Republicanism.
But that's simply my take on you, an opinion meaningless in the large scale of things.
Like I said I do like some of the things you write.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Unless he was being untruthful I don't believe he is or has ever been a Republican.
Wouldn't the best way to ascertain what someone is and what ideology he or she subscribes to is to ask him?
Thank you in advance.
Maybe we should establish a litmus test.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)back on Freeper. Oh wait, he must have evolved since then. Thats it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I wasn't aware of that. I rarely frequent that board unless it is when one of their own is on the wrong side of a political battle and then it is only to observe and revel in their misery.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)He was a longtime Freeper. Who has since "converted"
Personally I simply think the Republican party has just moved to far to the right for him. Leaving him the Democratic 3rd way as an option.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I had a buddy in the 80s who was retired USAF. He happened to be bisexual. He said the best sex he ever had was in the Air Force. As I remember there was a huge purge of Freepers who basically took the good ole American position that if someone wants to serve their country they should be able to, period.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)people who were gay and it was a huge issue for them on if they should come out or not.
I guess it was the sort of beginnings of their civil rights movement.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)He was a competitive bodybuilder and he was more upset that the Air Force disturbed his training regimen.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But he wanted to work out twice a day for three hours. Now I know Uncle Sam isn't going to pay you to spend forty hour a week in a gym.
I had another buddy, Air Force, again, must be a coincidence, or maybe they figured out it's the best way to avoid fighting in a rice paddy or getting too close to the enemy. He took the aptitude test and was promised he could learn to become a flight mechanic. After he enlisted they made him a chef. He was so distraught that he went to the Chaplain. The Chaplain instructed him to give it a chance. He actually ended up liking it and made a killer lasagna.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)but I did volunteer to work on JFK's campaign. My first vote in a presidential election was in 1968, while I was serving in the USAF. I voted for Hubert Humphrey, and got Richard Nixon, instead. Ironically, I got introduced to Nixon while on the job and had to say, "Good morning, Mr. President," since I was in uniform at the time.
I have never, even once, voted for any Republican for any office.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)I encourage you to be careful in your characterizations of people with whom you disagree. It's very easy to be very incorrect.