New York Times Gets it Wrong: Bernie Sanders Not "Top Beneficiary of Outside Money"

[SoapBox]

https://theintercept.com/2016/01/29/nyt-outside-spending/

The New York Times caused a stir by publishing a classic man-bites-dog style campaign finance story in its Friday editions titled “Bernie Sanders Is Top Beneficiary of Outside Money.” The article charges that despite his fiery campaign rhetoric against Super PACs and big money in politics, Sanders has gained much more from Super PAC spending than his Democratic opponents.

“In fact,” the Times reports, “more super PAC money has been spent so far in express support of Mr. Sanders than for either of his Democratic rivals, including Hillary Clinton, according to Federal Election Commission records.”

While more money has indeed been spent on a certain type of campaign spending in support of Sanders, the article leaves the wrong impression by suggesting that pro-Sanders Super PACs have outpaced outside groups supporting Hillary Clinton or Martin O’Malley. If that sounds confusing, that’s because the Times article hinges on a technicality in campaign finance law.

When total Super PAC spending is measured, Clinton groups are leading the way.

...continues at link!

[pangaia]

1. Not a surprise is it.

[CharlotteVale]

2. K&R

[onecaliberal]

3. She's too stupid to know millions won't vote for her because of the steaming pile of

Lies coming out of her campaign. She still doesn't get how completely fed up with this shit we are.