Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumQuad-City Times endorsements
The Times editorial board does not intend to tell any reader how to vote. Our intention is to encourage voting by modeling a process we hope readers follow: Be aware of the issues; meet the candidates; then make a decision.
We encourage readers to make their own, more important decision where it counts: On the ballot.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 551 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quad-City Times endorsements (Original Post)
Playinghardball
Jan 2016
OP
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)1. But but but the New York Times....
Fuck the NY Times
pangaia
(24,324 posts)2. Well, they sure made the right choice on othe blue side.
And the even picked the one guy who seems to be somewhat sane on the red side.
I wonder if RED equals Commie pinko?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)3. That guy in the sweater...
...I like him.
Good pick by the Quad City Times on the Democratic side.
Can't blame them much on the GOP side because there aren't any good choices -- who are still alive -- in the entire Republican Party.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)4. The Sanders editorial is *very* well written and persuasive.
It's not, at all, like the Hillary endorsements that appear rambling and illogical, that I've read.