Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:40 PM Oct 2015

Clintonistas starting to gloat over Hillary's superdelegate lead!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141245359

Quote from the Bloomberg article:

Based on a memo from campaign manager Robby Mook and delegate figures provided by the Democratic National Committee, Bloomberg Politics estimates Hillary Clinton has well over 500 superdelegate commitments, putting her even closer to securing the minimum number needed to win the party's nomination before ordinary voters cast a single ballot in a caucus or primary.

“Today, Hillary has more support from superdelegates than all the pledged delegates awarded in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and a third of delegates awarded on Super Tuesday combined,” Mook said in the memo, which was sent to supporters on Tuesday and obtained by Bloomberg. (Politico reported on the memo earlier Wednesday.)


That confirms my suspicion that the Clintons, and the Clintonistas on DU, are willing to say: "to Hell with democracy! We want a coronation!"

If Bernie goes into the convention with a strong lead, and Hillary turns it around with the superdelegates, we are going to lose a lot of the formerly disillusioned young people that Bernie brought back into the system.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clintonistas starting to gloat over Hillary's superdelegate lead! (Original Post) LongTomH Oct 2015 OP
To hell with it indeed! retrowire Oct 2015 #1
Yeah. I vote write-in if I sense super delegate shenanigans. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #4
Everyday I'm considering it. retrowire Oct 2015 #6
Just a suggestion, Kelvin Mace Oct 2015 #2
Agreed n/t arcane1 Oct 2015 #5
I agree with you. n/t A Little Weird Oct 2015 #7
Your point is well taken. I was really pissed off when I made my OP, and I still am! LongTomH Oct 2015 #11
I know, and many times they make it really hard Kelvin Mace Oct 2015 #12
+1 n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #14
+1 n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #13
Is there a good source StandingInLeftField Oct 2015 #3
This may help: LongTomH Oct 2015 #10
Well, if Bloomberg says it's definitly going to be Hillary, then ... Mark Grable Oct 2015 #8
Jury results. Puglover Oct 2015 #9
How nice of Juror #5 Teagan Oct 2015 #20
Anti Bernie Clintonista trolls gonna troll. L0oniX Oct 2015 #26
so now they are coming into a protected group restorefreedom Oct 2015 #30
But Hillary supporters are the ones being Puglover Oct 2015 #34
if that happens, restorefreedom Oct 2015 #35
We are moving to Ecuador permanently Puglover Oct 2015 #37
wow. i was thinking canada restorefreedom Oct 2015 #38
will they let you bring your pugs? nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #39
One old guy. Puglover Oct 2015 #41
the kitties are going too? yay! restorefreedom Oct 2015 #43
Lovely culture Puglover Oct 2015 #44
gorgeous. i hope you still visit us here, restorefreedom Oct 2015 #45
They've been doing that the whole time. smokey nj Oct 2015 #40
seems odd restorefreedom Oct 2015 #42
If DWS pulls that bullshit, Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #15
If it had not been the same system since 1976, I'd agree but this is not new yeoman6987 Oct 2015 #28
I'm Ok if they adhere to the 2008 Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #36
This goes beyond- ruffburr Oct 2015 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author LongTomH Oct 2015 #17
Unless she has their balls or ovaries or children in a jar, it doesn't count Demeter Oct 2015 #18
So much for this DLC infested "Democratic" party believing in a *democratic* process anymore! cascadiance Oct 2015 #19
It's just an oligarchy process. L0oniX Oct 2015 #25
It's non-binding support. IIRC, in 2008, Secretary Clinton had defections Babel_17 Oct 2015 #21
Yes, they are gloating but, they all seem a little silly and slightly hysterical to me. Hiraeth Oct 2015 #22
Just watch his speech from tonight with the students. SoapBox Oct 2015 #23
"superdelegates" representing the oligarchy. L0oniX Oct 2015 #24
They aren't binding. She had more than Obama at one point in 2007-8. Autumn Oct 2015 #27
no one is "gloating" about anything...... chillfactor Oct 2015 #29
They crank out this crap endlessly. Puglover Oct 2015 #31
Neither am I Autumn Oct 2015 #32
You could change the title- TBF Oct 2015 #33

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
1. To hell with it indeed!
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:42 PM
Oct 2015

Never forget.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251707570

Yeah, if Hillary wins nomination because of this superdelegate business alone... I'll just think, "Well, the electoral college decides the general and the superdelegates decide the primary. FUCK MY VOTE."

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
6. Everyday I'm considering it.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:49 PM
Oct 2015

I've never voted before...

Why would I want my first vote to be for the one that DIDN'T inspire me to vote for the first time in my life?

Bernie gave me hope and passion, and I wonder, even if it doesn't go his way, should I give him the vote he inspired me with to begin with?

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
2. Just a suggestion,
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:44 PM
Oct 2015

I am on record on DU as supporting Bernie, but I object to the use of the term "Clintonista". We should never lower ourselves to using Rush Limbaugh's vernacular.

And yes, they may call us names, but I would hope we were better than that.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
11. Your point is well taken. I was really pissed off when I made my OP, and I still am!
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:57 PM
Oct 2015

Sometimes it's hard to be 'better' than the other side.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
9. Jury results.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:53 PM
Oct 2015

On Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:43 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Clintonistas starting to gloat over Hillary's superdelegate lead!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128067134

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Please stop using Clintonistas

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:51 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Condescending and insulting are, sadly, no longer hideable offenses. "Clintonistas" is de rigueur. Let if fly.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter: Did you happen to notice the name of this (protected) group? If you don't like what is being said here then by all means stay away. WTF is wrong with this picture?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: People who do not support Clinton are well known in DU. Just don't read their posts.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Your candidate is going to lose so get over it without attacking supporters of the other candidate.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please stop sending ridiculous alerts. This alert is a perfect example how thin skinned folks can be. Tell the OP to knock it off if it is so offensive to you.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
30. so now they are coming into a protected group
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 03:45 PM
Oct 2015

to alert on post they don't like? While the desperation grows almost daily

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
34. But Hillary supporters are the ones being
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 03:57 PM
Oct 2015

"silenced" by evil Bernie alert swarms. They would NEVER alert.

If Hillary doe's indeed win the nomination this place is going to be an echo chamber complete with tumbleweeds.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
35. if that happens,
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 04:01 PM
Oct 2015

i might have to find some long term project that will require me to be away from du until after inauguration, at least

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
38. wow. i was thinking canada
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 05:30 PM
Oct 2015

but i have seen some interesting house hunters programs in places like ecuador, belize, nicaragua and the DR. hmmmmm

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
43. the kitties are going too? yay!
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 06:32 PM
Oct 2015

i like ecuador already!

yes i understand about the stress of trip...i think i would be a nervous wreck.

if you don't mind my asking, what drew you to ecuador?

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
44. Lovely culture
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 06:53 PM
Oct 2015

Perfect climate (for me) 75 degree days, 55 degree nights. I can play in the garden 365 days a year.

Just more peaceful.

Oh and pretty.

My house while being built along with a nice view.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
45. gorgeous. i hope you still visit us here,
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 06:56 PM
Oct 2015

but with that view, i could totally understand if you didn't

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
42. seems odd
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 06:30 PM
Oct 2015

that supporters of a candidate with a lock on the nom would bother to alert on a bunch of hippie progressives supporting a "fringe" candidate who has no chance at all


very odd........

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
36. I'm Ok if they adhere to the 2008
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 04:08 PM
Oct 2015

precedent with President Obama and Superdelegates. That was done democratically. But if they go the other way, (i.e. Bernie wins more regular delegates, but Superdelegates stick with Hillary) then all bets are off and we are in a state of political war in the Democratic Party.

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
16. This goes beyond-
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 06:08 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary and her supporters, This is total proof the electoral system itself is rigged and being manipulated by corporations / politicians , I am beginning to wonder just how much longer the 99percent can stand for a country that is both financially and electoral rigged against them ever making progressive change for better lives?

Response to LongTomH (Original post)

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
18. Unless she has their balls or ovaries or children in a jar, it doesn't count
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 06:17 PM
Oct 2015

Pie crust promises are easily made and just as easily broken. She cannot "lock up" super-delegates...unless she buys them, and has a written contract, at which point the country explodes anyway...

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
19. So much for this DLC infested "Democratic" party believing in a *democratic* process anymore!
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 06:43 PM
Oct 2015

If they want voters to feel like they are being honest with them, perhaps DWS should work with the DNC to get the party's name changed to something different that isn't a false label any more!

Party of the people? Where is it today?

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
21. It's non-binding support. IIRC, in 2008, Secretary Clinton had defections
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 07:35 PM
Oct 2015
https://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/obama/obama010308prvi.html

POSTING on Obama for America website
May 10, 2008

Two Virgin Island Superdelegates Endorse Barack Obama; Delegate Countdown - 157 To Go

Virgin Island superdelegates Carole Burke and Kevin Rodriquez endorsed Barack Obama today. Rodriquez had previously backed Senator Clinton but decided to switch his endorsement, citing Obama’s ability to unite the Democratic Party and win the White House:

While I have great respect for Senator Clinton, today I am announcing my support for Barack Obama. Senator Obama has brought a new generation and energy into the democratic process and the Democratic Party. He has shown he can connect with Democrats, Republicans and Independents across this country, whether we live on the mainland or an island. Senator Obama’s judgment to lead, courage to tell the truth and commitment to working men and women make him the best candidate to lead this country forward.

274 superdelegates have now endorsed Barack Obama and 122 have endorsed since February 5. Obama is 157 delegates away from securing the Democratic nomination.


More than one thing to take away from that. Notice how many waited till February, and even later. If Clinton's people are pushing for endorsements now, and are willing to take on the not very democratic looking optics that comes from that, it's because they have serious doubts as to how their campaign will weather the primary season. Doesn't speak well of our party's establishment either.

Just do away with the process, but everyone should be thrilled to vote in the general election for the one they picked before a single primary result is in. That's a self defeating way to run a party. Though for many it's not primarily about us, the voters, it's about them, the leadership.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
22. Yes, they are gloating but, they all seem a little silly and slightly hysterical to me.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 08:05 PM
Oct 2015

They have a feel of desperation about them. ... A last hurrah, if you will.

Autumn

(45,068 posts)
27. They aren't binding. She had more than Obama at one point in 2007-8.
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 02:37 PM
Oct 2015

No one really cares except her supporters.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
31. They crank out this crap endlessly.
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 03:50 PM
Oct 2015

I really don't know who they are trying to convince. Bernie supporters or themselves. And I am staying with Sanders until it's over.

Oh and someone alerted this.

Guess what? I'm not locking.

TBF

(32,056 posts)
33. You could change the title-
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 03:55 PM
Oct 2015

Why are we calling other dems names? They are potential allies when Bernie wins the nomination.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Clintonistas starting to ...