CNN Surprised To Find Bernie Support In Kentucky

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Cannot get the nomination!
He does not deserve it and couldn't win it in 2016. He is an Independent and not a Democratic candidate in my book.
Don’t vote for the Independent!

Go home Bernie!

Are Biden supporters buying exclamation points by the pound now? Enquiring minds want to know?

My messages about Bernie are consistent and I have a voice here same as any person. Biden supporter or not.

Bernie should not be a Democratic candidate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Disclaimer: All exclamation points are free on my iPhone keyboard!!

proudly emulate him! Going after Trump and liars going after him, Biden, is a service to our country!

"Cannot get the nomination!
He does not deserve it and couldn't win it in 2016. He is an Independent and not a Democratic candidate in my book."

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

More importantly, the American people deserve a Sanders administration. Which would be a Democratic administration, filled with Democrats.

But you are undecided?

I don't rush into that decision lightly. Still a lot of time. I support any candidate that not only identifies as a progressive, but their actions and work support that. That would be Sanders or Warren. I wanted to wait to see just how Warren did in her first foray. And she continues to do well, and continues to impress me.

But yes, if I had to say today, Bernie is my first choice. He has the most donations. (Not the most money) Every other candidate is in the dust on that factor. He's million + ahead of the pack. . That is an important fact. And he continues to do well DESPITE the best efforts of the MSM to either ignore him, or scoff at his platform.

Biden, while I do believe he'd beat Trump, would be a huge mistake. I doubt he'd have a second term. He'd only lead the party backwards and convince many of these kinds of voters to go back to the GOP, as he'd be perceived, as just another establishment politician. Especially if he only worked to keep the status quo. The status quo is what voters are rebelling against. Voters today respect a leader that is actually going to DO SOMETHING for them, like Medicare for All, or going after Wall Street's accesses.

I was going to give myself until the new year. I'll have to keep you on pins and needles until then

lives in Canada and can't vote in the US.

I will look at profiles in the future before responding. Just learning to do this actually even though I’ve been a member for a few years.

Tells you when someone might be stirring a pot that doesn’t belong to them.

I stand by my Bernie message. He can’t have it both ways in my opinion and I do realize it is just my opinion because he is indeed a candidate - much to my distress.

I am Canadian, and cannot vote in the US. But I still SUPPORT Sanders and Warren. Canada and the USA are each others largest trading partners. Everything you do, affects us, and visa versa. Not to mention I look at the world globally. I am concerned about the rash of right wing authoritarian governments springing up, including your own. That is why I feel all liberal thinking people must join forces and speak together, all around the world. To fight against union, environmental, and civil right decimation. I feel a kinship with Democrats in the US. Especially the more progressive breed of Democrat. This place saved my sanity when I joined just when Bush was going to war in Iraq. I want you, my good friends, to have universal healthcare too!

who would vote for Bernie. He would have to include a lot of those in the administration.

Not sure what you mean.

The self described independent voter, who voted Democratic, would expect the Democratic party to decide who they put in key positions. Just as if they voted Republican, they are expecting Republicans.

What I would expect, and what many were disappointed with in Obama, is that, if he wins, he will continue on with his progressive mandate post election, and appoint more forward thinking progressive Democrats in those key positions.

There and then it is Bernie’s turn to have people disappointed.

At least he won't be including any republicans, unlike the last two Democratic presidents.

There should not be a coronation. Feet must be held to the fire. It's not enough to say, "I'm a Bernie Sanders, vote for me."

Funny thing is many see Sanders as what Democrats used to be and should be.

We can argue whether changes to the party over the last 40 years were good or bad. But dismissing Sanders as "Not a Democrat" without considering why he has so much support among Democrats would be a mistake.

I admit I am also a bit annoyed of the double standard.

If any other Democratic Candidate (And Sanders is running as a Democrat) was drawing support in deep-red states, it would be seen as a good thing.

But for some reason when Sanders does it, it is given a collective m'eh" by the party.

I understand there is going to be a certain amount of rancor among supporters of different candidates during a primary. But this seems to go beyond that. It is always targeted at Sanders. And it's destructive to the Democrats.

If any other Democratic Candidate (And Sanders is running as a Democrat) was drawing support in deep-red states, it would be seen as a good thing..."

In 2016, it was spun derisively as "winning the confederacy..." and the voters as victims of "the Stockholm syndrome", so there's little reason to believe your sentiment as valid or accurate.

So I dont' know how to respond.

But in any case, the ostensible reason the Democrats justify going with a center candidate is to get the elusive "Swing voter", the guy who votes Republican but could (in theory) be persuaded to vote Democrat. All you need to do, the hypothesis holds, is to move right. Not be too "Liberal"

It's literally why Obama chose Biden as his VP. I think it was why Clinton chose Kaine.

Well, the problem is that hasn't worked at all. Red state voters aren't' impressed by a conservative or centrist Democrat.

But apparently they are willing to take a shot on a progressive.

When Obama was turning red states purple, it was seen as a great accomplishment.

When Sanders does it, it's somehow comparable to Stock holme syndrome and the Confederacy?!

Again there is a gross double standard.

He's a true Democrat, through and through, based on his policy positions, many of which have been adopted by most Democrats.


Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Bernie is more Democratic in his views than most of his fellow Democrats!!


Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

If Bernie were running as an Independent in this two-party country, he would lose. He could split the vote in a close election, especially as corrupt as our country's election process is. The Democratic Party is lucky he is running as a Democrat, so that he will not be on the ticket as an Independent candidate.

I am a Bernie supporter this time around, just as I was last time. I voted for him in the primary. Who are you to say Bernie does not deserve to be elected? I can trot out lots of candidates, by name, and say the same thing, and give solid reasons for my views. I don't do that. Why? Because it isn't right. I don't like it when people say things like you have stated about my favorite candidate, and I am not going to do that to supporters of other Democratic candidates. We all deserve the right to make up our own minds.

Every candidate, in my view, has the right to tell the nation why s/he would be a great president. Of course, I don't agree with all of the candidates. Some of them are simply not qualified for the job. Some of them are people I do not think will take the country in the direction that I think will benefit the majority of its citizens, either at all, or quickly enough to do some good during a term or two in office.

I voted for Hilary Clinton in the national election simply because she was the only reasonable choice since she was the Democratic candidate. I've voted for candidates I did not otherwise support, Democrats all, in previous elections, too.

I vote the straight D ticket, because what else is an intelligent person to do?

Comments like yours nauseate me. I can vote for whomever I please, even if doing so makes me know I am not being true to myself. Which is how I felt last time, and some other times, too.

My desire is to be able to vote for a candidate I fully support. I doubt that will ever happen. In the meanwhile, just be glad Bernie is not running as a third-party candidate, and right there on the ballots with the other two party's candidates.

Bernie could split the vote if he were running as a third-party candidate, instead of as a Democrat. It's happened before. It could happen again. Here are two examples:

1912 Election: Teddy Roosevelt

The 1912 United States presidential election was the 32nd quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 5, 1912. Democratic Governor Woodrow Wilson of New Jersey unseated incumbent Republican President William Howard Taft and defeated former President Theodore Roosevelt, who ran as the Progressive Party ("Bull Moose" nominee. Roosevelt remains the only third party presidential candidate in U.S. history to finish better than third in the popular or electoral vote.

... Wilson carried 40 states and won a large majority of the electoral vote, taking advantage of the split in the Republican Party. He was the first Democrat to win a presidential election since 1892, and would be one of just two Democratic presidents to serve between the American Civil War and the onset of the Great Depression. Roosevelt won 88 electoral votes, while Taft carried just two states, taking 8 electoral votes. Wilson won 41.8% of the national popular vote, while Roosevelt won 27%, Taft 23%, and Debs 6%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_United_States_presidential_election

2000 Election: Ralph Nader

In the 2000 presidential election in Florida, George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by 537 votes. Nader received 97,421 votes, which led to claims that he was responsible for Gore's defeat. Nader disputes that he helped Bush to win.[54][55][56] A 2003 study found that Nader's candidacy was a critical factor in Bush's victory.[57] A 2004 study found that Nader voters had the profile of likely voters with a preference for Democratic candidates.[58] They were therefore likely to vote and to do so for Gore over Bush in the absence of Nader's candidacy.[58]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Thanks for the thread LiberalLovinLug.

I know, right? "He's being ERASED!"

I can't wait to watch it!

I just can't abide by anyone claiming that the Democratic party is "ideologically bankrupt"... or that the Democratic party is the "party of the elite" or the "party of the one percent". Yeah, those lies and insults and smears burn my nerves. I could NEVER support anyone who publicly states that Democrats are "feeble" and that the party is an "absolute failure" and the Democrats are "do-nothings" who "don't care about climate change" and that Democrats "focus too much on diversity". That "burns my nerves" too. It's also NOT TRUE that the Democrats who "are very big into diversity" aren't "particularly sympathetic" to the working class. It's offensive to hear those lies repeated over and over again.

I'm tired of crying.

Do you agree with them? Do you agree that the Democratic party is "feeble" and "ideologically bankrupt"? Do you agree that the Democratic party is the "party of the elite" or the "party of the one percent". Do you agree when someone falsely claims that the Democrats are "do-nothings" who "don't care about climate change" and that Democrats "focus too much on diversity".

How does it make you feel when someone says that Democrats aren't "particularly sympathetic" to the working class?

...because of medical bills. And much worse, some people die because they cannot afford healthcare.

Tears, and fears, again.

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

The lies and smears only benefit the GOP. It weakens the Democratic party by creating division and distrust. It does absolutely nothing to benefit "those whose lives hang in the balance". In fact it does the exact opposite for the most vulnerable among us. The lies and negativity generates apathy. Apathy discourages voter turnout. Low voter turnout gives Republicans and Russia a chance to steal the elections. What good purpose does that serve?

...."whose lives hang in the balance".

For most of the past eight years my life has hung in the balance (impoverished and on indigent care). I don't consider Bernie to be my hero.

Those lies and smears generate negativity. Negativity generates apathy. Apathy discourages voter turnout. Low voter turnout gives Republicans a chance to steal the elections.

Why would anyone purposely do things that help the GOP and Trump and the Russians to steal elections? Why would anyone defend that type of behavior? Why would anyone pretend that it hasn't happened or that it doesn't matter.

Words matter, and those attacks, and smears and lies only benefit the GOP... it does NOT help people who cannot afford healthcare.

It's the trap of the cult of personality... and vanity. Basically, an inability of some individuals to admit that they're wrong or that other viewpoints are equally valid and other methods are more productive. The "all or nothing" and "no compromise" strategies seldom work and generally end up with an empty plate.

All I'm saying is... if we want to defeat and neutralize the GOP (and Russia) then the Democratic party is the ONLY option. There are no other choices. It's only ONE of TWO parties. We have a defacto two-party system when it comes to national politics. It serves NO good purpose for anyone to smear, belittle or denigrate Democrats or the Democratic party.

The only motivation for doing such a thing is vanity and pride.

using their pain and fear and basically screwing them over because the things people are promising are not practical. It's just cruel. When you or your loved one is facing medical issues right now, how does some esoteric ideological debate help?

Hiring Jill Stein voters to run his campaign didn't help.

Do you see him on every day? Every week? Once a month even? Is he a part of a returning panel?

lol. The fact that you noticed him as a guest, and commented, infers that you don't see him much.

One appearance and its "so much" for him of not getting any media coverage. lol

Dec 01 2019
Sun
Columbia SC Town Hall
Columbia, SC
Nov 19 2019
Tue
NBC Interview

NBC
Nov 17 2019
Sun
Las Vegas NV Town Hall
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 11 2019
Mon
Commemorative Speech
Des Moines, IA
Oct 28 2019
Mon
Tommy Vietor Interview
Washington DC
Oct 19 2019
Sat
New York City NY Speech
New York City, NY
Sep 27 2019
Fri
Stephen Colbert Interview
New York City, NY
CBS
Sep 23 2019
Mon
Clinton Iowa Speech
Clinton, IA
Sep 14 2019
Sat
UNLV Speech
UNLV
Sep 13 2019
Fri
Matt Taibbi Interview
Las Vegas, NV
Sep 04 2019
Wed
The View Interview
New York City, NY
ABC
Sep 03 2019
Tue
Nashua NH Town Hall
Nashua, NH
Sep 02 2019
Mon
Claremont NH Town Hall
Claremont, NH
Aug 29 2019
Thu
Interview
Atlanta, GA
Aug 27 2019
Tue
Krystal Ball Interview
Washington DC
Aug 25 2019
Sun
Louisville KY Speech
Louisville, KY
Aug 20 2019
Tue
Four Directions Forum
Sioux City, IA
Aug 11 2019
Sun
Iowa State Fair Speech
Des Moines, IA
Aug 11 2019
Sun
Margaret Brennan Interview
Greenfield, IA
CBS
Jul 16 2019
Tue
Washington Post Interview
Washington DC
Jul 11 2019
Thu
LULAC Hosted Town Hall
Milwaukee, WI
Jul 11 2019
Thu
George Stephanopolos Interview
New York City, NY
ABC
Jun 27 2019
Thu
Andrea Mitchell Interview
Miami, FL
MSNBC
Jun 23 2019
Sun
Rock Hill SC Town Hall
Rock Hill, SC
Jun 22 2019
Sat
MSNBC Interview
Columbia , SC
MSNBC
Jun 22 2019
Sat
Shaquille Brewster Interview
South Carolina Democratic Convention
MSNBC
Jun 21 2019
Fri
Velshi & Ruhle Interview
Washington DC
MSNBC
Jun 16 2019
Sun
Chris Wallace Interview
Washington DC
Fox News
Jun 12 2019
Wed
George Washington Speech
Washington DC
Jun 09 2019
Sun
Dubuque Iowa Rally
Dubuque, IA
Jun 09 2019
Sun
Iowa Democratic Party Hall of Fame Speech
Cedar Rapids, IA
Jun 08 2019
Sat
Waterloo Iowa Town Hall
Waterloo, IA
Jun 08 2019
Sat
Marshalltown Iowa Town Hall
Marshalltown, IA
Jun 01 2019
Sat
San Jose CA Rally
San Jose, CA
May 31 2019
Fri
Pasadena CA Rally
Pasadena, CA
May 29 2019
Wed
Reno NV Rally
Reno , NV
May 29 2019
Wed
Las Vegas NV Rally
Las Vegas, NV
May 19 2019
Sun
Interview
Washington DC
NBC
May 09 2019
Thu
Velshi & Ruhle Interview
New York City, NY
MSNBC
Apr 22 2019
Mon
CNN Town Hall
Manchester, NH
CNN
Apr 15 2019
Mon
Fox News Town Hall
Bethlehem, PA
Fox News
Mar 31 2019
Sun
Margaret Brennan Interview
Washington DC
CBS
Mar 01 2019
Fri
The View Interview
New York City, NY
ABC
Mar 01 2019
Fri
Seth Meyers Interview
New York City, NY
NBC
Feb 25 2019
Mon
CNN Town Hall
New York City, NY
CNN
Feb 22 2019
Fri
Chris Hayes Interview
New York City, NY
MSNBC
Feb 19 2019
Tue
YouTube Presidential Announcement

https://governmenty.com/bernie-sanders-events

Obviously in a primary race, any Presidential candidate should be on TV as much as they can.

Even so......on your list I count about 20 TV appearances, all year. Still kind of sparse for a top candidate.

But back to the topic, I couldn't find some record of Moore's appearances, so I googled "michael moore CNN 2019", and "michael moore MSNBC 2019"

I found,

Four different dates for CNN

Three for MSNBC

Maybe he appeared on other networks too, but those two would be the main ones he'd be asked to go on.

So again...obviously those two hosts get to speak to the camera every day. And how much do those two guests. McCaskill and Wilson get on as guest pundits? I see them on all the time.

Thanks for participating in the discussion.

Sid

Best with sound on:

Link to tweet

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

and his FEC filing for his 2024 Senate campaign also indicates that he filed as an independent. I guess that is something that we are supposed to ignore though.

He and his staff have violated that pledge repeatedly. Has Bernie refiled his 2024 election campaign with the FEC to indicate that he is a Democrat instead of independent? If the answer is no, then we certainly have the right to question the validity of the pledge you are touting.

Check the upper right corner and you will see the date is March 4, 2019, one day before he signed the pledge you mentioned.

https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/416/201903049145600416/201903049145600416.pdf

So am I supposed to believe the FEC filing of March 4 or the pledge he made on March 5?

Only it wasn't true.

Bernie Sanders will remain a member of the Democratic Party after his primary election against Hillary Clinton, his campaign manager said Wednesday.

The independent Vermont senator’s congressional website currently notes that Sanders is the “the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history,” though he caucuses with Democrats.

“If Sen. Sanders is not the nominee, will he stay in the Democratic Party forever now,” Bloomberg Politics’ Mark Halperin asked.

“Well, he is a Democrat. He’s said he’s a Democrat, and he’s gonna be [supporting] the Democratic nominee, whoever that is,” Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told Bloomberg Politics’ “With All Due Respect.”

“But he’s a member of the Democratic Party now for life?” Halperin pressed.

“Yes, he is,” Weaver said. “Yes, he is.”

https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-democrat-independent-222228

course of the primary season.

However, Bernie and his team also have gone on offense. That certainly goes against the spirit of the pledge and I don't see any justification as acceptable--even that he is constantly being attacked. No matter how things are spun, Bernie failed to keep his promise and that weighs negatively with voters as they consider Bernie's candidacy.

It's more wishful thinking than anything. I just hope when he wins the nomination you and others so negative on him will vote for him.

because I don't think he will win the nomination. As far as wishful thinking is concerned, there seems to be plenty of that going around.

You contradict yourself. Because right underneath the statement "I don't expect to be voting for him," you state that you will be voting for him.

At least I didn't post a thread attacking another candidate (Buttigieg) while simultaneously changing "my preferred candidate" from Sanders to Biden so that it would appear like that attack was coming from a Biden supporter instead of a Bernie supporter.

I am also aware of at least two other Bernie supporters that also tried to misleading other DU members pulling the same stunt. By the way, all three of those members support Bernie this election.

Did you bother calling those members out? I already know the answer to that question so you really don't need to respond.

It just shows that you can't believe everything you see on the Internet. I think that I'll continue to show Bernie just for the hell of it.

If Bernie drops one more percentage point, then Biden will receive all 228 delegates from Texas. Bye, bye Bernie. For all practical purposes the rest of the primaries after Super Tuesday won't matter.

I haven't ee Sanders attack the other Democratic contenders any more than they have attacked him.

In other words, he attacks the policies while pushing his own.

Last i heard that was how a campaign was supposed to be run.

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie 2020!!
Either way, they're stronger together!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

Nearly tied in the last primary in Kentucky so I don't really understand why anyone would be surprised.

who tend to be culturally conservative/libertarian, and to the left on economics.

Vermont is a rural white state with demographics that resemble many of these red states.

The Dem party changed over the past 50 years, became more diverse and metropolitan, with a social justice focus (as embodied by icons such as Hillary and Obama) that many heartland whites resent - hence the embrace of populism from the right (Trump) and left (Sanders, Stein, etc).

Might want to rethink your post as I see a few problems.

For one, Sanders has lots of support among minorities and women. The issue for him is more generational.

For another, Sanders was fighting for civil rights for black people since the 60s. He supported gay rights in the 80s. Anyone who thinks Sanders doesn't have a "Social Justice Focus" doesn't' really know the man's history.

And finally, maybe dismissing populists as inherently racist (without ANY evidence to that effect) is a bit.. out of touch. The Bernie supporters here said flat out why there's support for him in Kentucky. His position on health care. That isnt exclusive to white people.

who supports civil/gay/women's rights from that perspective, but isn't going to draw a line in the sand the way a social liberal would. Warren for example has the same/similar economic platform as Sanders, yet is disliked intensely (just as much as Hillary was) by the white heartland, because she is a fierce social liberal and a woman.

Basically Sanders would prefer that his voters support civil rights, but if they don't, as long as they support economic leftism - then he thinks that's good enough, as to him economics/class are the 'true oppression', where social issues are merely a side concern at best, and at worst only work to 'divide' the working class. He has given numerous speeches to this effect, about 'identity politics', about reaching out to Trump voters (and downplaying their racism/sexism), about not scaring away the white working class, etc.

Again, a social liberal, or 'social justice warrior' as some of his supporters would characterize it - does not view social justice as a choice but a mandate - the 'long march' of civil rights through the institutions of society, to correct historical inequities. Even a moderate social liberal like Bill Clinton or Obama viewed it this way, merely choosing incrementalism towards this end and making compromises along the way, while still believing in the ultimate goal in the long run.

And Sanders' supporters (who are mainly white) understand all of this on an intuitive level - that he isn't forcing them to accept social justice (in the short or long run), as long as they support his economic leftism and his populist narratives, which (surprise surprise) tend to center the white working class at its struggles and resentments, its small town sensibilities, its aesthetic - just like the old FDR/Dixiecrat Dem party used to.

Yeah much of his focus is on economic issues and that's about the only thing I think you got right.

The guy endorsed gay Marriage in the 80s. Not a lot of politicians were doing that. And that is just one example. There is no incrementalism about his social justice. His politics were formed on social Justice.

Ok you want to know why Sanders is popular with a lot of white people, it's simple. I will tell you as a white guy who has always supported Bernie Sanders.

He doesn't' accept this is a binary choice. Helping rural white people and being for civil rights for non-white/cis/straight isn't an either-or nor does he accept the framing of it as such. Framing that while pushed mostly by Republicans but isn't really challenged by a lot of Democrats.

A lot of rural white people feel abandoned. The Democratic party as a whole seems to have written them off. The only people talking to them were the Republicans who stoked prejudices. The guys in the OP's video flat out explain this.

But then along comes Sanders who says "Rural America does have problems. They arent' imagining it. But it's isn't some black single mom getting food stamps. It's not an immigrant looking for a better life. Its' the rich and powerful who have exploited rural America just like they have exploited everyone else."

The conflict between white rural America and diverse urban America is based on a false narrative.

Maybe someone could explain it better but frankly, I don't' think you have taken the time to listen to Sanders or any of his supporters. Maybe you should.



I think this statement alone kind of sums up my issue here.

His populist narratives actually are universal. After Biden, Sanders leads in the African American vote. He is intensely popular with Latinos. Much of his supporters are women. These people aren't' stupid nor monolithic. They can understand their own self interest.

Framing Sander's policies as "for white people" seriously misses all sorts of points.

So before responding (assuming you will) maybe take some time to ask Sanders supporters WHY they support him and his policies.

And maybe ask Sanders supporters who aren't white men. Though you seem to think they are like Unicorns I assure they are actually quite common and perfectly capable of speaking for themselves if politely asked.

Accuracy!

CNN Reports on the main portion of its full-screen Chyron that Sanders is within the margin of error of first place in California but omits him from the caption. Yellow journalism at its worst!

Link to tweet

Sometimes its done very overtly, sometimes its more subtle.

The main narrative in the media was pro war.

But if you looked you could see the cracks, the news that contradicted that narrative.

Even the main cable news channels provided facts that showed Bush was lying even as they pushed for that war.

The same thing seems ot be happening

here. The Media pushes a narrative. But they aren't monolithic. And they still have to report what is going on.

Everyone knows who Bernie is and he is featured prominently not only on the news (which nobody watches anymore), but on the late night talk shows (which people do watch).

I've already started the countdown for the sour grapes.

Its all a double switcharoo, I see.

You pretend to just be another sad Bernie Basher, with nothing better to do than ridicule another Democratic candidate, but actually you are committed to voting for him! shhhhh. your sig line gives you away.

You pretend to have the same irrational hatred of grass root supported, individual donations, bottom up type governing. But you actually love Bernie! You're not crazy at all. You purposely try and make people disgusted with what you say and infer about him, so they run all the faster to support him. Now I get it. Brilliant!

Thanks for the Bernie sig. Makes it look like there's more Sanders supporters on DU, which might encourage others. Maybe we can get this place to reflect the actual numbers outside of DU, which has him much higher. Good plan!

at least I didn't post a thread attacking another candidate (Buttigieg) while simultaneously changing "my preferred candidate" from Sanders to Biden so that it would appear like that attack was coming from a Biden supporter instead of a Bernie supporter.

I am also aware of at least two other Bernie supporters that also tried to misleading other DU members pulling the same stunt. By the way, all three of those members support Bernie this election.

I'll take your word for it, that there are Bernie supporters changing to Biden. Clever, but naughty. Something I might have thought of. he he. And if this is allowed to continue by admin, I just may say, if you can't beat em, join em. Would be kinda fun exposing Biden's flaws as a candidate while bearing his sig. I can see the temptation. I am going to make my sig decision on Jan 1st.

But really, I'd feel a little dirty. Fun for an afternoon, but I can't see playing the imposter too long. Its a cheap ploy. If one gets off on pretending to be a candidate they don't like to sneakily flame other actual supporters, then maybe there's a flaw in the candidate you are hiding from. Its a tad desperate. That's what many will think at least. Something to consider. (For those doing it either way)

Then it will be pointed out that you are a Canadian citizen and can't vote in the U.S. Considering that one of the concerns in the last election and the current election is about foreign interference...well, needless to say some members are already wondering.

My first preferred choice was Beto O'Rourke. You can check that I still remain the host there and posted frequently within that group. After Beto withdrew from the race I was automatically changed to "Undecided" after the admins updated the list of candidates to note that he withdrew. I did post a thank you message between the time he withdrew and before the admins made the change that he withdrew. That group is closed so nobody can post there anymore-- not even myself. In the meantime, please realize that any system can be manipulated and I'm relatively late to the game. I noted that none of the Bernie supporters called out the members that changed their preferences when they had less than honorable intentions. Did you call out any of them?

At some point, I will change back to "Undecided" since I haven't made my final decision, but in the mean time I'm comfortable leaving my preference as is. I still have two or three candidates that remain in consideration and I've completely eliminated several other candidates. Since I don't have to vote until Super Tuesday, I have plenty of time left. I still may not indicate who my choice at that time is either since there is no requirement that we have to divulge our choice on DU.

So have and choose whomever you wish on January 1. What's posted on DU as far as our candidate preference has no significance in the real world.

Its the damned Canadians! Not the Russians.

Don't let Justin Trudeau's boyish looks fool you. He's a secret masochist and wants another four years of insults.

I would hope that the majority of DU users would understand how close Canada is with the USA, both culturally, economically, major religion, a democratic political system. And we are each others largest trading partners. And realize how invested Canadians are in the political results there. Also that many hopefully realize that this is a global fight. Trump is a huge boil on the world. But someone else will replace him who is just as evil, greedy, and destructive, even if they are smart enough not to look an idiot. There is a right wing authoritarian wave sweeping the globe. I will not sit by silently while this happens without at least being able to vent about it in a message board that represents the party that has the best chance to defeat this in the closest other country to me, and be intimidated from sharing my concerns simply because I don't have the right birth certificate.

I honestly have never seen a Bernie supporter use another candidate sig for that reason. I'll take your word for it though. Sanders supporters are among the smartest.

Part of why I haven't put any choice under me is precisely because I can't vote there. But it is how DU admin has set it up. So if I continue "undecided" I get called out for not deciding, which has happened. And I look like I'm doing a similar thing as you and Nurse Jackie are doing, by pretending to not endorse anyone but really going for Sanders. (Who by now one could guess would be my choice for your President) I want to support Sanders still, even if not by voting. I can still donate. I can still push his message on this and other social media sites. Because a Sanders, or Warren, administration would be good for the US, for Canada, and for the world.

But on a serious note, you can still donate? To who? I hope that you are referring to DU because you can't donate to any US presidential candidates without breaking federal law. And awhile ago you made a comment about what the US deserves, so I know that brought some scrutiny as to what a Canadian thinks the US deserves.

Unfortunately, even if you have the most noble intentions, there will always be a question mark as to whose interests you are supporting when you are participating on a political discussion board in another country--I would expect similar doubts to be expressed if I participated on a political discussion board in your country which is why I don't. You're definitely welcome to bash Trump and bash the Republican party on DU; however, when it comes down to the primary candidates and most policies you are probably on shaky ground.

As for Sanders supporters being among the smartest, well that is a debatable statement which I don't agree with it, but to each their own. However, it has been noted that they displayed their deviousness as I mentioned in an earlier response. Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it isn't true and other DUers noticed it also. I'd point you to it, but the author of that OP already reverted back to Bernie as their preferred candidate. Nobody was fooled by that charade.

By the way, you seem to be perfectly fine if someone on your side employs devious tactics and you consider that to be smart. However, if someone on the other side employs similar tactics then they are dirty. Talk about a double standard.

it also shows that you can't believe everything you see on the Internet (even the poll numbers).