Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

andym

(5,962 posts)
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 03:12 PM Mar 2020

538 now predicts a 3 in 5 chance that no one wins on the first ballot-- caucus-like convention

1 in 4 chance for Bernie to win outright
1 in 7 chance for Biden to win outright
less than 1 in 100 chance for any of the others to win outright

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primary-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

So what happens is that to a large extent the convention will become like a caucus-- with inviable candidate thresholds etc, on subsequent ballots. There is one difference: superdelegates could play a role as well as on the second ballot there would be 764 (771?) delegates added to the pool-- which would presumably raise the threshold for winning. It might be interesting if superdelegates decided to sit out subsequent rounds, forcing the campaigns and their elected delegates to negotiate.

Updated:
1991 delegates required on first ballot
2375.5 delegates required on second ballot
source: ballotpedia
https://ballotpedia.org/Superdelegates_and_the_2020_Democratic_National_Convention
are these numbers correct?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538 now predicts a 3 in 5 chance that no one wins on the first ballot-- caucus-like convention (Original Post) andym Mar 2020 OP
The threshold starting on the second ballot is 2345 Moderateguy Mar 2020 #1
OK that makes sense-- the first ballot threshold is 1991 andym Mar 2020 #2
That's exactly what I said. Laelth Mar 2020 #3
Your independent analysis is very much in tune with 538. andym Mar 2020 #5
538 has been a hot mess for years Politicub Mar 2020 #4
 

Moderateguy

(945 posts)
1. The threshold starting on the second ballot is 2345
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 03:14 PM
Mar 2020
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

andym

(5,962 posts)
2. OK that makes sense-- the first ballot threshold is 1991
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 03:17 PM
Mar 2020

so the superdelegates do raise the requirement.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
3. That's exactly what I said.
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 03:50 PM
Mar 2020
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

andym

(5,962 posts)
5. Your independent analysis is very much in tune with 538.
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 04:37 PM
Mar 2020

Impressive.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Politicub

(12,309 posts)
4. 538 has been a hot mess for years
Sun Mar 1, 2020, 03:53 PM
Mar 2020

I think it's only there as clickbait now.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»538 now predicts a 3 in 5...